Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: bihar and uttar pradesh alteration of boundaries act 1968 section 14 arrears of taxes Sorted by: recent Page 33 of about 322 results (0.123 seconds)

Apr 24 1973 (SC)

Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru and ors.Vs. State of Kerala and anr ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1973SC1461; (1973)4SCC225; [1973]SuppSCR1

..... in pursuance of the directive principles. the mood of the majority party is reflected in the speech of pandit govind vallabh pant, the then chief minister of uttar pradesh. speaking in the constituent assembly on article 31 and after justifying the provision of article 31(4) & (6) in relation to laws regarding zamindaris and ..... which we as a party have been committed in the past generation or so it is the agrarian reforms and the abolition of the zamindari system. shri hussain imam (bihar) : "with compensation.shri jawaharlal nehru : "with adequate proper compensation not too much". shri hussain imam : "adequate is quite enough". shri shyama prasad mukherjee, ..... existence of a 'public purpose' is undoubtedly an implied condition of the exercise of compulsory powers of acquisition by the state...." (per mahajan j. state of bihar v. makarajadhiraja of darbhanga 1952 scr 889 at 934).(iii) the supreme court has laid down that there is an implied limitation on legislative power: the legislature .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 13 1969 (SC)

State of Gujarat Vs. Shantilal Mangaldas and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1969SC634; (1970)72BOMLR1; (1969)GLR879(SC); (1969)1SCC509; [1969]3SCR341

..... in the state of bihar. in kameshwar singh v. state of bihar i.l.r.pat. 454 the patna high court held that the bihar land reforms act, 1951, contravened article 14 in that it accorded differential treatment to landowners in the matter of compensation. similar challenge raised to the uttar pradesh zamindari abolition and land ..... reforms act, 1950, was rejected by the high court of allahabad : surya pal v. state of u.p. i.l.r. [1952] all. 46. a group of petitions challenging the validity of the madhya pradesh abolition of proprietary rights (estates, mahals, ..... alienated lands) act 1951 was moved in this court: visheswar v. state of madhya pradesh : [1952]1scr1020 but before these petitions could be disposed of, the constitution (first amendment) act, 1951 .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //