Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: bihar and uttar pradesh alteration of boundaries act 1968 section 14 arrears of taxes Sorted by: recent Page 30 of about 322 results (0.147 seconds)

Purshottam Das Tandon Vs. Military Estate Officer

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR2000All127; (2000)1UPLBEC738

..... ) is answered in favour of the petitioner.12. re : question no. (iii) :--12.1 order ii, rule 2 of the code of civil procedure, as it exists in our state (uttar pradesh) reads thus :--'2. suit to include the whole claim.-- (1) every suit shall include the whole of the claim which the plaintiff is entitled to make in respect of the ..... khanam v. deputy director of consolidation, meerut, 1975 awc 481; ganesh jha v. baidyanath jha : air1958pat270 ; malkhan singh v. sohan singh : [1986]161itr386(sc) ; mohd. salamatullah v. government of andhra pradesh : [1977]2scr636 ; sarguja transport service v. state transport appellate tribunal : [1987]1scr200 ; and forward construction co v. prabhat mandal : air1986sc391 .6. sri srivastava, in reply, apart from reiterating his submissions .....

Vijay Krishna Kumbhar Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2000(2)BomCR293

..... under the act. it was also possible to press section 149 into service to demonstrate that the civil court's decree was wrong. finally, the supreme court in state of bihar v. dhirendra kumar, : [1995]3scr857 , followed by two more judgments takes the view that the provisions of the land acquisition act form a complete code in itself meant to serve .....

Ram Badan Rai and Others Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 1998VIIIAD(SC)165; AIR1999SC166; 1999(1)BLJR255; JT1998(7)SC478; 1998(6)SCALE71; (1999)1SCC705; [1998]Supp2SCR583

..... , : air1996sc2877 .52. in other words, the effect of section 26 of the 1968 act is that even after the transfer of some territories from bihar to uttar pradesh, the bihar laws in force in those areas before such transfer shall continue to apply in those territories till the laws of the transferee state of up are extended ..... territories to which any law in force immediately before the appointed day extends or applies, and territorial references in any such law to the state of bihar or uttar pradesh shall, until otherwise provided by a competent legislature or other competent authority, be construed as meaning the territories within that state immediately before the appointed day ..... were being administered as if they formed part of that province and the territories specified in clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 3 of the bihar and uttar pradesh (alteration of boundaries) act, 1968, but excluding the territories specified in clause (a) of sub-section (1) of section 3 of that act.'29. the .....

Samatha Vs. State of A.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1997SC3297; JT1997(6)SC449; 1997(4)SCALE746; (1997)8SCC191; [1997]Supp2SCR305

..... poor, and illiterate and away from winds of modern agricultural technology and economy. such cultivation is predominantly prevalent in andhra pradesh, bihar, orissa, madhya pradesh, maharashtra, gujarat, rajasthan, north-eastern states and some parts of uttar pradesh. according to this practice, an area covered with vegetation is burnt out to serve as manure. cultivation is done ..... equally, the madras cultivating tenants protection act, 1955 provides the same relief. in tripura, tripura land revenue and land reforms act, 1960 imposes similar restrictions. in uttar pradesh, the u.p. land laws (amendment) act, 1982 was made though its implementation was stayed by the high court. 31. the above bird's eye ..... 71 l ed 11] wherein it was held that the president has the executive power to appoint and remove executive subordinates. 44 84. in the state of uttar pradesh & ors. vs. babu ram upadhyay [(1961) 2 scr 679] cited by shri choudhary, it was held that the pleasure doctrine of the president under .....

Chamundi Hotel (P) Ltd. and ors. Vs. State and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1997KAR1573

..... as well as the executive action taken under such law, as it did in state of west bengal v. anwar ali sarkar (d) (supra), dwarka prasad v. state of uttar pradesh, : [1954]1scr803 (m) and dhirendra kumar mondal v. superintendent & remembrancer of legal affaris, 1955-1 scr 2241 : (air 1954 sc 424) (n).a statute may ..... kedarnath bajoria v. state of west bengal : 1953crilj1621 (i) v.m. syed mohamad & co. v. state of andhra, : [1954]1scr1117 (j) and budhan choudhry v. state of bihar (a) (supra). a statute may direct its provisions against one individual person or thing or to several individuals, persons or things but no reasonable basis of classification may appear on ..... through its ruler. the state next complains that, acting beyond the powers given over under the instrument of accession, the dominion of india and the state of bihar are making laws which they have no power to make, having regard to the instrument of accession, and are wrongfully interfering with the administration of the state .....

Seminole Tribe of FlA. Vs. Florida

Court : US Supreme Court

Seminole Tribe of Fla. v. Florida - 517 U.S. 44 (1995) OCTOBER TERM, 1995 Syllabus SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA v. FLORIDA ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 94-12. Argued October 11, 1995-Decided March 27,1996 The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, passed by Congress pursuant to the Indian Commerce Clause, allows an Indian tribe to conduct certain gaming activities only in conformance with a valid compact between the tribe and the State in which the gaming activities are located. 25 U. S. C. 2710(d)(I)(C). Under the Act, States have a duty to negotiate in good faith with a tribe toward the formation of a compact, 2710(d)(3)(A), and a tribe may sue a State in federal court in order to compel performance of that duty, 2710(d)(7). In this 2710(d)(7) suit, respondents, Florida and its Governor, moved to dismiss petitioner Seminole Tribe's complaint on the ground that the suit violated Florida's sovereign immunity from suit in federal ...

Supreme Court Advocates-on-record Association and Another Vs. Union of ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1994SC268; JT1993(5)SC497; (1993)4SCC441; [1993]Supp2SCR659

..... 'integrated process'. in this connection, our attention was drawn to the illustrative observation of subba rao, cj speaking for the constitution bench in chandra mohan v. state of uttar pradesh and ors. : (1967)illj412sc wherein, he had said :to state it differently, if a is empowered to appoint b in consultation with c, he will not be ..... if he makes an appointment of a person without ascertaining the high court's views in regard thereto. it was strenuously contended on behalf of the state of bihar that the materials before the court amply demonstrate that there had been consultation with the high court before the issue of the notification of october 17, 1968. ..... a remarkable development in this area in recent times due to the dynamic judicial activism. reference may be made to (1) the bengal immunity company limited v. the state of bihar and ors. : [1955]2scr603 , (2) samsher singh and anr. v. state of punjab : (1974)iillj465sc , (3) union of india v. sankal chand himatlal sheth and anr. .....

R.C. Poudyal and ors. Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1993SC1804; JT1993(2)SC1; 1993(1)SCALE489; 1994Supp(1)SCC324; [1993]1SCR891

..... on the basis of separate electorates for members of different religious communities offends against this clause. (see : nain sukh das and anr. v. the state of uttar pradesh and ors.; : [1953]4scr1184 .188. similarly article 325 requires that there shall be one general electoral roll for every constituency for election to either house of ..... the delimitation of parliamentary and assembly constituencies order, 1976. the amended provisions of sub-section (3) of section 7 dealt with (besides dealing with arunachal pradesh) this matter. these special provisions have been challenged by the writ petitioner on various grounds.91. the first objection taken on behalf of the respondents is ..... , that is due to historical reasons, and that has always been recognised as a proper basis of classification under article 14.70. in state of madhya pradesh v. bhopal sugar industries ltd. : [1964]52itr443(sc) this court said:.the legislature has always the power to make special laws to attain particular objects .....

indra Sawhney Etc. Etc Vs. Union of India and Others, Etc. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1993SC477; [1992]Supp2SCR454; 1992DGLS(soft)768:1992Supp(3)SCC217

..... force. reservations in favour of o.b.cs. are in force in the states of kerala, tamil nadu, karnataka, andhra pradesh, maharashtra, orissa, bihar, gujarat, goa, uttar pradesh, punjab, haryana and himachal pradesh among others. in madhya pradesh, a list of o.b.cs. was prepared on the basis of mahajan commission report but it appears to have been ..... 1) tamil nadu and karnataka had a long history of backward classes movements and various measures for their welfare were taken in a phased manner. in uttar pradesh and bihar such measures did not mark the culmination of a mass movement.(2) in the south 'the forward communities have been divided either by the classification schemes ..... backward classes welfare'. it is a case study of provisions in force in two southern states namely tamil nadu and karnataka and the two northern states, bihar and uttar pradesh. the conclusions drawn from the discussion are stated in para 8.45 in the following words:'in view of the foregoing account, the reasons for much .....

Indian Administrative Service (S.C.S.) Association, U.P. and ors.;niro ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 1992(3)SCALE126; 1993Supp(1)SCC730; [1992]Supp2SCR389

..... on completion of 8 to 9 years of service are becoming qualified for promotion to all india administrative service, while the officers from states like uttar pradesh and bihar would get chance only after putting 24 to 27 years of service. the estimate committee of seventh lok sabha to in its 77th report highlighted ..... reconsider the matter to give retrospective operation to the first amendment rules. the tribunal at patna upheld the rules and dismissed the application. the officers from uttar pradesh through their association filed the writ petition under article 32 of the constitution seeking writ of certiorari to quash the order dated december 12, 1990 made ..... consultation under article 320 does not effect the ultimate decision taken by the authority under article 311 of the constitution. in ram gopal chaturvedi v. state of madhya pradesh the same view was reiterated. in n. raghavendra rao v. dy. commissioner, south kanara, mangalore, words 'prior approval' of the govt. in construing the .....