Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: bihar and uttar pradesh alteration of boundaries act 1968 section 14 arrears of taxes Sorted by: recent Page 1 of about 322 results (0.643 seconds)

Dec 11 2023 (SC)

In Re Article 370 Of The Constitution

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the constitution confers legislative and executive powers on the states, which play an indispensable role in our democratic set-up. 357 uttar pradesh reorganisation act 2000 358 bihar reorganisation act 2000 359 andhra pradesh reorganisation act 2014 339 part e these characteristics of states are not usually lost when its boundaries, size, or name are ..... constitution, the expression constituent assembly of the state referred to in clause (2) shall read legislative assembly of the state . (emphasis supplied) 261 state of uttar pradesh v. singhara singh, 1963 air358256 part e368 paragraph 2 of co272applies the entire constitution of india (as amended from time to time) to the state of jammu ..... to the constitution. the principle 259 (1996) 9 scc495260 commissioner of income tax, mumbai v. anjum m.h. ghaswala, (2002) 1 scc633 state of uttar pradesh v. singhara singh, 1963 air358255 part e underlying this rule is that the provision may as well have not been enacted if the procedure it provides is .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 05 2009 (SC)

Pradeep Chaudhary and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2009(12)SC269; 2009(7)SCALE12; (2009)12SCC248

..... additional solicitor general appearing on behalf of the union of india, on the other hand, took us through the discussions which took place in the uttar pradesh state legislative assembly to contend that from a perusal thereof, it would appear that a thourough discussion had taken place with regard to inclusion of the ..... that for making such territorial adjustments it is not necessary even to invoke the provisions governing constitutional amendments. 18. the legislature of the state of uttar pradesh cannot be said to have been wholly unaware of the question as to whether the district of haridwar was to be included in the proposed ..... several writ petitions were filed before this court and several other writ applications involving similar questions were filed before different high courts questioning similar provisions of bihar state reorganization act whereby also some districts were included in the new state, transfer applications having been moved, the said writ petitions were withdrawn from .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 03 2007 (HC)

Cottage Industries Exposition Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) a ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2007(122)ECC7; 2007(148)LC7(Delhi); 2009(235)ELT60(Del)

..... a resolution in pursuance of article 252 of the constitution empowering parliament to pass the necessary legislation on the subject. the legislatures of the states of andhra pradesh, bihar, gujarat, haryana, himachal pradesh, madhya pradesh, manipur, punjab, rajasthan, uttar pradesh and west bengal have passed such resolutions. 4. the bill seeks to- (a) constitute a wild life advisory board for each state;(b) regulate hunting of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 08 2004 (HC)

V. Subramanian Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Rep. by Its Secretary to Mini ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2004)4MLJ380

..... a, b & c states and has categorized only the states and the union territories. among the states are andhra pradesh, assam, bihar, bombay, kerala, madhya pradesh, madras, mysore, orissa, punjab, rajasthan, uttar pradesh, west bengal and jammu & kashmir. formation of a new state can be by separation of territory from an existing ..... section 11 of the states reorganisation act, 1956. 11. rajasthan the territories specified in section 10 of the states reogranisation act, 1956. 12. uttar pradesh the territories which immediately before the commencement of this constitution were either comprised in the province known as the united provinces or were being administered ..... which immediately before the commencement of this constitution were being administered as if they were chief commissioner's provinces under the names of himachal pradesh and bilaspur. 3. manipur the territory which immediately before the commencement of this constitution was being administered as if it were a chief commissioner .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 24 2004 (HC)

Jagdutt Thakur and anr. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

..... the deep stream of river ganga forms the inter-state boundary between shahabad district of bihar and ballia district of uttar pradesh. the river has been changing its course almost every year, as a result of which the inter-state boundary continues to fluctuate, giving rise to ..... because respondent nos. 6 to 25 are supporting the petitioners. he next submits that the state of uttar pradesh has not been impleaded as party respondent.7. learned counsel for respondent nos. 1, 4 and 5 (state of bihar has adopted the arguments advanced by respondent nos. 26 to 94. he submits that survey of an ..... by the petitioners for survey of villages shivpur and nawaranga chak under the provisions of the bihar tenancy act, 1885 (hereinafter referred to as the '1885 act').2. it appears from the statements of objects and reasons of the bihar and uttar pradesh (alteration of boundaries) act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the 'central act'), that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 30 1999 (HC)

Gadi Koppula Rajamauli Vs. Election Tribunal, (Senior Civil Judge), Ad ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2000(3)ALD342; 2000(3)ALT31

..... 25 of 1996 deciding the additional issue holding that the said court has jurisdiction to entertain the petition under section 233 of the andhra pradesh panchayat raj act, 1990 read with rule 2 of a.p. panchayat raj (election tribunal in respect of gram panchayat, mandal ..... and in such manner as is provided for by or under any law made by the legislature of a state. the andhra pradesh panchayat raj act, 1994 has been enacted pursuant to the above constitutional provision. section 233 of the act stipulates that no election ..... court was based on the assumption that by the dale of decree, the area stood transferred to u.p. state by the 'bihar and u.p. alteration of boundary act, 1968' and also on further assumption that the u.p. statute was territorially extended to ..... the plaint was filed in a court in u.p., which had no jurisdiction inasmuch as the lands were dejure part of bihar state as on 16-11-1962 and the fact that subsequently after 1968 the area stood statutorily transferred by section 3 of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 09 1998 (SC)

Ram Badan Rai and Others Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 1998VIIIAD(SC)165; AIR1999SC166; 1999(1)BLJR255; JT1998(7)SC478; 1998(6)SCALE71; (1999)1SCC705; [1998]Supp2SCR583

..... , : air1996sc2877 .52. in other words, the effect of section 26 of the 1968 act is that even after the transfer of some territories from bihar to uttar pradesh, the bihar laws in force in those areas before such transfer shall continue to apply in those territories till the laws of the transferee state of up are extended ..... territories to which any law in force immediately before the appointed day extends or applies, and territorial references in any such law to the state of bihar or uttar pradesh shall, until otherwise provided by a competent legislature or other competent authority, be construed as meaning the territories within that state immediately before the appointed day ..... were being administered as if they formed part of that province and the territories specified in clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 3 of the bihar and uttar pradesh (alteration of boundaries) act, 1968, but excluding the territories specified in clause (a) of sub-section (1) of section 3 of that act.'29. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 21 1997 (HC)

Escotel Mobile Communications Limited Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1997IIIAD(Delhi)520; 1997(2)ARBLR33(Delhi); 1997(41)DRJ217

..... north east 14. orissa 15. punjab 16. rajasthan 17. tamil nadu (except area covered by maraimalai nagar export promotion zone (mezp), minjur and mahaballipuram). 18. uttar pradesh (except the local telephone area of ghaziabad, noida) 19. west bengal. note : following 4 metropolitan cities for which tenders have already been invited are excluded ..... the doctrine has been explained in the judgment of the supreme court as reported in m/s motilal padampat sugar mills co. ltd. v. the state of uttar pradesh and others : [1979]118itr326(sc) . the relevant passage may be referred to as below: 'the true principle of promissory estoppel, thereforee, seems to ..... mentioned below in the country. 1. andaman & nicobar 2. andhra pradesh 3. assam 4. bihar 5. gujarat 6. haryana (except the local areas served by faridabad and gurgaon telephone exchanges) 7. himachal pradesh 8. jammu & kashmir 9. karnataka 10.kerala 11. madhya pradesh 12. maharashtra (except the local areas served by kalyan telephone district). .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 13 1996 (SC)

Ram Janam Vs. Radhakrishna Chaube and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 1996IIIAD(SC)473; AIR1996SC3146; JT1996(3)SC642; 1996(3)SCALE192; (1996)8SCC277; [1996]3SCR400; 1996(2)LC318(SC)

..... the decree and judgment of the courts below on question of jurisdiction of the court in the high court. the high court found that under the bihar & uttar pradesh (alteration of boundaries) act, 1968 (act 24 of 1968) (for short, the 'boundaries act') passed by the parliament, the village of mohammadpur in the ..... territories to which any law in force immediately before the appoint day extends or applies, and territorial references in any such law to the state of bihar or uttar pradesh shall, until otherwise provided by a competent legislature or other competent authority, be construed as meaning the territories within that state immediately before the appointed ..... district of ballia in uttar pradesh was part of shahabad district in bihar state. at the time when the suit was instituted the act had no application. the trial court and the appellate court also lacked inherent jurisdiction .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 12 1993 (SC)

Gauri Shankar Gaur and Others, Etc. Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1994SC169; 1993(3)SCALE371; (1994)1SCC92; [1993]Supp1SCR667

..... specified in the schedule to this act.(emphasis supplied)in the schedule it has been provided thus:modifications in the land acquisition act, 1894, as amended in its application to uttar pradesh (hereinafter called 'the said act')*** *** ***2. effect of notices under this act. - (1) the first publication, in the official gazette, of notice of any ..... alienation of land act had been bodily transposed into it' and it was by incorporation.17. in bolani ores ltd. v. state of orissa : [1975]2scr138 , bihar and orissa motor vehicles taxation act and mysore motor vehicles taxation act, 1957 adapted the definition of 'motor vehicles' contained in motor vehicles act, 1914. subsequently it ..... was not cured. in that selling this court held that the parliament legislated for itself and statutorily adapted itself the second proviso to section 10 of the bihar act which was otherwise ultra vires of sub-rule (2) of rule 20. it was further contended that if the technique adopted by reference or incorporated .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //