Court : Karnataka
..... submissions, he has relied upon the following judgments:1. air1951sc467 harla vs. the state of rajasthan.2. (1997) 2 scc453 state of bihar and others vs. bihar distillery ltd and others.3. (2010) 12 scc1: bhanumati and others vs. state of uttar pradesh through its principal secretary and others.4. (1996) 3 scc709: state of a.p. and others vs. mcdowell & co. and others ..... the mischief which the enactment is sought to remedy. apex court in the matter of 398 bhanumati and others vs. state of uttar pradesh, through its principal secretary and others reported in (2010) 12 scc1has held:"82. in state of bihar vs. bihar distillery ltd. this court in scc para 17 at p. 466: jt para 18 at pp. 865-66 of the report .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... submissions, he has relied upon the following judgments:1. air1951sc467 harla vs. the state of rajasthan.2. (1997) 2 scc453 state of bihar and others vs. bihar distillery ltd and others.3. (2010) 12 scc1: bhanumati and others vs. state of uttar pradesh through its principal secretary and others.4. (1996) 3 scc709: state of a.p. and others vs. mcdowell & co. and others ..... the mischief which the enactment is sought to remedy. apex court in the matter of 398 bhanumati and others vs. state of uttar pradesh, through its principal secretary and others reported in (2010) 12 scc1has held:"82. in state of bihar vs. bihar distillery ltd. this court in scc para 17 at p. 466: jt para 18 at pp. 865-66 of the report .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... submissions, he has relied upon the following judgments:1. air1951sc467 harla vs. the state of rajasthan.2. (1997) 2 scc453 state of bihar and others vs. bihar distillery ltd and others.3. (2010) 12 scc1: bhanumati and others vs. state of uttar pradesh through its principal secretary and others.4. (1996) 3 scc709: state of a.p. and others vs. mcdowell & co. and others ..... the mischief which the enactment is sought to remedy. apex court in the matter of 398 bhanumati and others vs. state of uttar pradesh, through its principal secretary and others reported in (2010) 12 scc1has held:"82. in state of bihar vs. bihar distillery ltd. this court in scc para 17 at p. 466: jt para 18 at pp. 865-66 of the report .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... submissions, he has relied upon the following judgments:1. air1951sc467 harla vs. the state of rajasthan.2. (1997) 2 scc453 state of bihar and others vs. bihar distillery ltd and others.3. (2010) 12 scc1: bhanumati and others vs. state of uttar pradesh through its principal secretary and others.4. (1996) 3 scc709: state of a.p. and others vs. mcdowell & co. and others ..... the mischief which the enactment is sought to remedy. apex court in the matter of 398 bhanumati and others vs. state of uttar pradesh, through its principal secretary and others reported in (2010) 12 scc1has held:"82. in state of bihar vs. bihar distillery ltd. this court in scc para 17 at p. 466: jt para 18 at pp. 865-66 of the report .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... submissions, he has relied upon the following judgments:1. air1951sc467 harla vs. the state of rajasthan.2. (1997) 2 scc453 state of bihar and others vs. bihar distillery ltd and others.3. (2010) 12 scc1: bhanumati and others vs. state of uttar pradesh through its principal secretary and others.4. (1996) 3 scc709: state of a.p. and others vs. mcdowell & co. and others ..... the mischief which the enactment is sought to remedy. apex court in the matter of 398 bhanumati and others vs. state of uttar pradesh, through its principal secretary and others reported in (2010) 12 scc1has held:"82. in state of bihar vs. bihar distillery ltd. this court in scc para 17 at p. 466: jt para 18 at pp. 865-66 of the report .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... submissions, he has relied upon the following judgments:1. air1951sc467 harla vs. the state of rajasthan.2. (1997) 2 scc453 state of bihar and others vs. bihar distillery ltd and others.3. (2010) 12 scc1: bhanumati and others vs. state of uttar pradesh through its principal secretary and others.4. (1996) 3 scc709: state of a.p. and others vs. mcdowell & co. and others ..... the mischief which the enactment is sought to remedy. apex court in the matter of 398 bhanumati and others vs. state of uttar pradesh, through its principal secretary and others reported in (2010) 12 scc1has held:"82. in state of bihar vs. bihar distillery ltd. this court in scc para 17 at p. 466: jt para 18 at pp. 865-66 of the report .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... submissions, he has relied upon the following judgments:1. air1951sc467 harla vs. the state of rajasthan.2. (1997) 2 scc453 state of bihar and others vs. bihar distillery ltd and others.3. (2010) 12 scc1: bhanumati and others vs. state of uttar pradesh through its principal secretary and others.4. (1996) 3 scc709: state of a.p. and others vs. mcdowell & co. and others ..... the mischief which the enactment is sought to remedy. apex court in the matter of 398 bhanumati and others vs. state of uttar pradesh, through its principal secretary and others reported in (2010) 12 scc1has held:"82. in state of bihar vs. bihar distillery ltd. this court in scc para 17 at p. 466: jt para 18 at pp. 865-66 of the report .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... hold that the requirement is not mandatory and the specified consequence should not follow. (emphasis supplied) 236. similarly, in ram deen maurya (dr.) v. state of uttar pradesh and ors155 this court observed that non-compliance with the directory provision does not affect the validity of the act done in breach thereof. 155 (2009) 6 scc735in ..... mischief rule (or heydon's mischief rule) was pressed into service on behalf of landowners relying upon the decision in bengal immunity co v. the state of bihar (supra), it was submitted that act of 1894 did not provide for lapse in the case of inordinate delay on the part of acquiring authorities to complete ..... ors. v. anand kumar sharma and ors., (2003) 3 scc433 bhavnagar university v. palitana sugar mill pvt. ltd. and ors., air2003sc511 chandrika prasad yadav v. state of bihar and ors., air2004sc2036 m/s. rubber house v. excellsior needle industries pvt. ltd., air1989sc1160 b.s. khurana and ors. v. municipal corporation of delhi and ors., (2000) .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... , varanasi and ors. v. state of u.p. and ors., (1997) 4 scc606 ( sri adi visheshwara ), this court upheld the constitutional validity of the uttar pradesh sri kashi vishwanath temple act, 1983. in so doing, they referred to the tests of a religious denomination laid down in the previous judgments of this court, and ..... rajasthan; the bhagati maa temple in kanya kumari, kerala; the attukal bhagavathy temple in kerala; the chakkulathukavu temple in kerala; and the mata temple in muzaffarpur, bihar. 24 a particular religion or shrine, who are aggrieved by certain practises which are found to be oppressive or pernicious. 7.5. article 25(1) confers on ..... sahi, the special officer in charge of hindu religious trust & ors.21, this court considered the constitutional validity of actions taken by the bihar state board of religious trusts under the bihar hindu religious trusts act, 1950 as being violative of the fundamental rights of mahants of certain maths or asthals guaranteed, inter alia, under .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... relied on two judgments of this court in support of his submission namely, mohd. saeed siddiqui vs. state of uttar pradesh and another, 355 (2014) 11 scc415and yogendra kumar jaiswal and others vs. state of bihar and others, (2016) 3 scc183 he submits that in both the decisions, this court while dealing with the question ..... fake ration cards which were causing inefficiencies in targeting. between july 2006 and july 2010, in bihar, madhya pradesh, uttar pradesh and orissa, total of 37 lakh ineligible/fake ration cards for households have been eliminated. additionally, in maharashtra and madhya pradesh, 29 lakh and 25 lakh ineligible ration cards were discovered and cancelled. (c) world ..... 01.2000 by which the power was withdrawn from the gram 208 panchayats. the writ petition was allowed by the high court against which state of uttar pradesh filed an appeal. the submission was raised before this court on behalf of the writ petitioner that denuding the power from panchayats will be against .....
Tag this Judgment!