Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Bid - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 10 2025

Sri Avik Bid vs the State by Jalahalli Police Station

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jun-10-2025

OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION No.2429 OF 2022 BETWEEN: SRI AVIK BID S/O MALOY KUMAR BID AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.4023 PRESTIGE WELLINGTON PARK JALAHALLI, BENGALURU - 560


Oct 16 2025

M/S. Bid & Hammer vs M/S. Hcl Corporation Pvt. Ltd.,

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Oct-16-2025

AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 5486 OF 2016 (AA) BETWEEN: M/S. BID & HAMMER AUCTIONEERS (P) LTD., A COMPANY REGISTERED AND INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING ITS REGISTERED


Sep 10 1999

J.D. Bids Was Vs. Indian Airlines

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-10-1999

Reported in: 2000IAD(Delhi)779; 83(2000)DLT38

ORDERN.G. Nandi, J.1. In this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has been seeking to quash the termination of the petitioner being illegal, in contravention of Sections 25F and 25G of...


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 18 2025

Jaideep Bose versus M/S Bid and Hammer Auctioneers Private Limited

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Feb-18-2025

Reported in: [2025]3S.C.R.234

[2025] 3 S.C.R. 234 : 2025 INSC 241 Jaideep Bose v. M/s Bid and Hammer Auctioneers Private Limited (Criminal Appeal No. 814 of 2025) 18 February 2025 [J.B. Pardiwala and R.


Jul 01 2019

Gvk Airport Holdings Limited vs.bid Services Division (Mauritius) Limi ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-01-2019

Rajiv Nayar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Kartik Nayar, Advocate, Mr. Sarthak Malhotra and Mr. Rishab Kumar, Advocate. versus BID SERVICES DIVISION (MAURITIUS) LIMITED & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Amit Sibal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Saurabh Kirpal,


Jan 30 2024

Mr Nagesh Alai vs Bid and Hammer Auctioneers (P) Limited

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jan-30-2024

FLOOR, NARIMAN POINT, MUMBAI - 400 021. …APPLICANT (BY SRI SANATH KUMAR SHETTY K, ADV. FOR APPLICANT) AND: BID AND HAMMER AUCTIONEERS (P) LIMITED A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER INDIAN COMPANIES ACT HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT DADHA


Dec 05 2024

Mr. Nagesh Alai vs Bid and Hammer Auctioneers (P) Limited

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Dec-05-2024

HAVING HIS OFFICE AT NIRMAL 4TH FLOOR, NARIMAN POINT MUMBAI-400021 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SANATHKUMAR SHETTY K., ADVOCATE) AND: BID AND HAMMER AUCTIONEERS (P) LIMITED A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER INDIAN COMPANIES ACT HAVING Digitally signedby B VEENA ITS


Jan 08 2003

Kiran Graphics Vs. Tender Committee Constituted for Technical and Pric ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jan-08-2003

Reported in: 2003(1)ALD808

series; and No. J4-94/ 2002-03 for procurement of Forms/Books of 'SB and remaining series'. The petitioner submitted its bids in respect of the three tenders notified on 29-08-2002. Twenty nine tender forms were sold. The last date


Mar 15 2013

Absa Technology Finance Solutions (Pty) Vs. Michaelâandeuro;andtrade; ...

Court: South Africa Supreme Court of Appeal

Decided on: Mar-15-2013

litigation. The second respondent, Michael Rose, was an estate agent who conducted business through the first respondent, Michaels Bid a House CC (the CC). He wished to acquire a sophisticated colour printing machine for the CC and


Nov 10 2006

P.K. Bids Was Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-10-2006

Reported in: [2007]3SCL514(Delhi)

Manju Goel, J.1. Rule. With the consent of counsel for the parties, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal.2. The petitioner and respondent No. 3 were both working as Executive Directors with the Reserve...


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial