Bicycling - Judgment Search Results
National Bicycle Corporation of India Ltd. and anr. Vs. Ramlakhan Sara ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-07-2005
Reported in: 2005(5)BomCR370; [2005(106)FLR154]; 2005(2)MhLj980a
the period between 1st January, 1999 and 31st December, 1999.3. The petitioner before the Court is the National Bicycle Corporation of India Limited. Hind Cycles Limited which was run by the Birla Group of Industries had a
The National Bicycle Corporation of India Limited, Bombay Vs. Gopal B. ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-05-2002
Reported in: 2002(5)BomCR470; (2002)4BOMLR473; [2002(95)FLR751]; (2002)IIILLJ787Bom; 2002(2)MhLj850
to thebenefit of employment with, whether freshor continued and back wages, if any andfrom what date M/s. National BicycleCorporation of India Ltd., by virtue ofSection 13(i) of Hind Cycles Limited andSen-Releigh Limited (Nationalisation) Act,1980. If not what
National Bicycle Corporation of India Ltd. Vs. Gopal B. Keluskar and O ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-19-1994
Reported in: 1995(1)BomCR472; (1995)ILLJ525Bom; 1995(1)MhLj140
of a notification. In pursuance of the said power, the said undertaking has stood vested in the National Bicycle Corporation of India Limited, a 100% Government Company i.e. the petitioner in this petition. 6. The question to
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Eclipse Bicycle Co. Vs. Farrow
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-18-1905
Eclipse Bicycle Co. v. Farrow - 199 U.S. 581 (1905) U.S. Supreme Court Eclipse Bicycle Co. v. Farrow, 199 U.S.
B.S. Kurup Vs. National Bicycle Corporation of India Ltd. and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-21-1995
Reported in: [1995(71)FLR470]
The Labour Court, in terms held that the main functions of the Petitioner were those of selling of bicycles of the First Respondent and that his main duty was to work as a Sales Representative. It is
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Bicycle Mfg. Corpn.
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chandigarh
Decided on: Jun-09-2003
Reported in: (2004)82TTJ(Chd.)570
1. This appeal by the Revenue for the asst. yr. 1987-88 is directed against the order of CIT(A) cancelling penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act of Rs. 1,27,943 for claiming bogus purchases to the...
M/S. Punjab Pen House Vs. M/S. Samrat Bicycle Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-22-1990
Reported in: AIR1992Delhi1; ILR1990Delhi549
have consented to the alteration and the matter will be disposed of exparte accordingly. Yours faithfully, for Samrat Bicycles Limited Sd/ (Sunita Mathur) Asstt. Company Secretary This letter is dated 20th February, 1988 i.e. it was written
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free