Bicycles - Judgment Search Results

National Bicycle Corporation of India Ltd. and anr. Vs. Ramlakhan Sara ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2005(5)BomCR370; [2005(106)FLR154]; 2005(2)MhLj980a

run by the Birla Group of Industries had a factory at Worli, Mumbai, in which the manufacture of bicycles and bicycle parts was carried out. The management of the undertaking was taken over by the Government of

The National Bicycle Corporation of India Limited, Bombay Vs. Gopal B. ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2002(5)BomCR470; (2002)4BOMLR473; [2002(95)FLR751]; (2002)IIILLJ787Bom; 2002(2)MhLj850

to thebenefit of employment with, whether freshor continued and back wages, if any andfrom what date M/s. National BicycleCorporation of India Ltd., by virtue ofSection 13(i) of Hind Cycles Limited andSen-Releigh Limited (Nationalisation) Act,1980. If not what

National Bicycle Corporation of India Ltd. Vs. Gopal B. Keluskar and O ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1995(1)BomCR472; (1995)ILLJ525Bom; 1995(1)MhLj140

of a notification. In pursuance of the said power, the said undertaking has stood vested in the National Bicycle Corporation of India Limited, a 100% Government Company i.e. the petitioner in this petition. 6. The question to

Eclipse Bicycle Co. Vs. Farrow

Court: US Supreme Court

the material portions are as follows: it begins with a recital that Farrow has invented certain improvements in bicycles, etc., pertaining to automatic mechanism for coasting and braking, for which he has made two numbered applications for

B.S. Kurup Vs. National Bicycle Corporation of India Ltd. and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: [1995(71)FLR470]

The Labour Court, in terms held that the main functions of the Petitioner were those of selling of bicycles of the First Respondent and that his main duty was to work as a Sales Representative. It is

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Bicycle Mfg. Corpn.

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chandigarh

Reported in: (2004)82TTJ(Chd.)570

1. This appeal by the Revenue for the asst. yr. 1987-88 is directed against the order of CIT(A) cancelling penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act of Rs. 1,27,943 for claiming bogus purchases to the...

M/S. Punjab Pen House Vs. M/S. Samrat Bicycle Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: AIR1992Delhi1; ILR1990Delhi549

have consented to the alteration and the matter will be disposed of exparte accordingly. Yours faithfully, for Samrat Bicycles Limited Sd/ (Sunita Mathur) Asstt. Company Secretary This letter is dated 20th February, 1988 i.e. it was written