Bhima Shaw V State - Judgment Search Results

Budu Gouda and anr. Vs. State

Court: Orissa

Reported in: AIR1965Ori170; 1965CriLJ385

a lathi. 20. It is the settled view as expressed by a Division Bench of this Court in Bhima Shaw v. State, 22 Cut L T 317: (AIR 1956 Orissa 177) that a court would be entitled to reject those

Paramhansa Jadab and anr. Vs. the State

Court: Orissa

Reported in: AIR1964Ori144; 1964CriLJ680

that portion of the confession which incriminates the maker may be used as corroborative of her evidence (see Bhima Shaw v. State, 22 Cut LT 317 : (AIR 1956 Orissa 177) ). Ram Jatan has unambiguously admitted that he was

Bai Chaturi and ors. Vs. States

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: AIR1960Guj5

under S. 400 or 401, I.P.C., the bad character of the accused is a fact in issue. Vide Bhima Shaw v. State : AIR1956Ori177 , and the cases cited there. With great respect even in cases under S. 400 or

Bai Chaturi W/O Andheribhai and ors. Vs. State

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: 1960CriLJ1204

Under Section 400 or 401, IPC the bad character of the accused is a fact in issue. Vide Bhima Shaw v. State : AIR1956Ori177 , and the cases cited there. With great respect even in cases Under Section 400 Or

State of Orissa and ors. Vs. Harapriya Bisoi

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2009SC2991; JT2009(7)SC92; 2009(II)OLR(SC)229; (2009)12SCC378; 2009(7)LC3326(SC):2009AIRSCW48062009(4)LHSC2600

the duty is not to deceive. See Shrisht Dhawan (Smt. ) v. Shaw Brothers : AIR1992SC1555 .37. In that case it was observed as follows:Fraud … owners or holders of interest in land between the raiyat and the State. In Kumar Bimal Chandra Sinha v. State of Orissa : [1963]2SCR552 , this Court while considering the scope of the Act has held as follows:the … possession of suit land by the appellant is found to be disputed with others like Dijabar Behera S/o Bhima Behera and Golakh Behera S/o Kesab Behera. (5) Besides, an area of Ac 2.300 dec. out of the

Deoraj Deju Suvarna and Etc. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1994(4)BomCR85; 1994CriLJ3602

Investigating Officer delayed recording his aforesaid statement. 22. The Apex Court in the case of Ganesh Bhavan Patel v. State of Maharashtra reported in : 1979CriLJ51 has observed :- 'Delay of few hours, simplicitor in recording the statements … Mrs. Ponda submitted that it was the bounden duty of the prosecution to examine the second panch, Atmaram Bhima Adhav. Mr. Lambay submitted that in respect of the recovery of clothes there was evidence of police witnesses … of the broken pieces of glass of the light of auto risk shaw has been falsely shown to be broken pieces of glass of soda

Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors

Court: Supreme Court of India

authoritative pronouncement of the Supreme Court27. The Constitution Bench of this Court in Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia and Others v. State of Punjab (1980) 2 SCC 565 had an occasion to comprehensively deal with the scope and ambit of … Patil of BJP came to the village to meet his party workers. At that juncture, Shrimant Ishwarappa Kore, Bhimashankar Ishwarappa Kore, Kallapa Gaddi, Sangappa Gaddi, Gafur Patil, Layappa Gaddi, Mahadev Kore, Suresh Gaddi, Suresh Zhalaki, Ankalgi, Sarpanch … taking a view contrary to that of the Constitution bench in Rameshwar Shaw's case (1964) 4 SCR 921"34. He placed reliance on another judgment of

Yellappa Ramappa Naik Vs. Tippanna Laxman Naik

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1929)31BOMLR249

Matched in: Judge Shaw,; Blanesburgh and; John Wallis, JJ.

State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Koneru Suryanarayana and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1963AP94

to by Smith, L. J., in (1896) 2 Ch 1 at p. 28 was approved of by Lord Shaw in Attornay General of Southern Nigeria v. John Holt and Co., Ltd., 1915 AC 599 : (AIR 1915 … Indian peninsula before reaching the sea in the east. Its waters are augmented by great tributaries like the Bhima, Varna, Tungabhadra and Musi. It is the base of large irrigation system and a mighty project for impounding … in the Krishna river. The 1st defendant to the action is the State of Andhra Pradesh represented by the Collector, Krishna, The 7th defendant is

Province of Bombay Vs. Madhukar Ganpat Nerlekar

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1952Bom37; (1951)53BOMLR754; ILR1952Bom269

against the plaintiff on the two charges made against him. It was argued that the evidence of Bhagu Bhima Jagtap, Shaikh Ibrahim Shaikh Nabi and Pratapmal Tarachand Marwadi was not really much good, since these witnesses were … parties in the controversy to correct or contradict any relevant statement prejudicial to their view. His Lordship (Lord Shaw of Dunfermline) then went on to say that the words 'natural justice' occurred inarguments and sometimes in judicial … Vyas, J.[1] These are two appeals arising out of civil suit No. 1483 … alleged paid association of the police-officers with the gamblers. He made a statement at the above mentioned conference containing allegations against certain police-officers who were