Bested - Judgment Search Results

Best Vs. City of Toledo

Court: US Supreme Court

BEST v. CITY OF TOLEDO - 369 U.S. 657 (1962) U.S. Supreme Court BEST v. CITY OF TOLEDO, 369

Best Vs. Humboldt Placer Mining Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Best v. Humboldt Placer Mining Co. - 371 U.S. 334 (1963) U.S. Supreme Court Best v. Humboldt Placer Mining

Best Vs. District of Columbia

Court: US Supreme Court

Best v. District of Columbia - 291 U.S. 411 (1934) U.S. Supreme Court Best v. District of Columbia, 291

Woolsey Vs. Best

Court: US Supreme Court

Woolsey v. Best - 299 U.S. 1 (1936) U.S. Supreme Court Woolsey v. Best, 299 U.S. 1 (1936) Woolsey v. Best

Best Vs. Polk

Court: US Supreme Court

Best v. Polk - 85 U.S. 112 (1873) U.S. Supreme Court Best v. Polk, 85 U.S. 18 Wall. 112

Bray (inspector of Taxes) Vs. Best.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1988)72CTR(Cal)18,[1990]184ITR195(Cal)

than it would have been if both sets of trustees had simply adopted the figures produced by the best of the computer printouts.'From these findings it seems to me quite impossible to say that the payment can

Savage's Assignee Vs. Best

Court: US Supreme Court

Savage's Assignee v. Best - 44 U.S. 111 (1845) U.S. Supreme Court Savage's Assignee v. Best, 44 U.S. 3 How. 111 111

Best Workers Union and Vs. the Best Undertaking and

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: [2008(116)FLR118]; (2008)ILLJ1058Bom

a Bus Controller. Petitioner No. 2 has put in 34 years of service. There was a strike in BEST Undertaking for one and half days from the mid-night of 18th April, 2007, to the evening of 20th

General Secretary, Best Worker's Union Vs. General Manager, Best Under ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2007(3)BomCR497; (2006)IIILLJ924Bom; 2006(44)MhLj32

J.1. The petitioner being a General Secretary, was an active Union member and an office bearer of the BEST Workers Union. He therefore, claimed to be a protected employee under Section 101 of the Bombay Industrial Relations

General Secretary, BEST Workers' Union Vs. General Manager, BEST Under ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: [2008(119)FLR67]; (2008)IIILLJ825Bom; 2008(6)MhLj73

P.B. Majmudar, J.1. This petition is directed against the judgment and order passed by the Industrial Court, Maharashtra at Mumbai in Appeal (IC) No. 2 of 1996 by which the Industrial Court has allowed the appeal...