Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Benefiter - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 20 1995

Oriental Benefit and Deposit Society Ltd. Vs. Bharat Kumar K. Shah

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-20-1995

Reported in: [2001]103CompCas947(Mad)

257 of the Companies Act. Clause (1) of the decretal order reads as follows :'(1) That the Oriental Benefit and Deposit Society Limited, the respondent herein, its agents, servants and representatives be and are hereby restrained by


Aug 13 2024

Sri Sujies Benefit Funds Limited Vs. M. Jaganathuan

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-13-2024

OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.3369 OF2024[ @ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.) NO.4022 OF2022]. SRI SUJIES BENEFIT FUNDS LIMITED …APPELLANT VERSUS M. JAGANATHUAN … RESPONDENT JUDGMENT AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH, J.Heard Mr B. Ragunath, learned counsel for


Jan 10 1995

Mohan Benefit Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Kachraji Raymalji and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jan-10-1995

Reported in: 1997ACJ1438; (1997)9SCC103

ORDER1. On 23.2.1973, a truck collided with a scooter and three persons were killed. Three claim petitions were filed in respect of their deaths. They were filed against the respondent No. 1, who was the driver...


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 19 2024

Parambil Mutual Benefit Nidhi Limited vs Union of India

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Mar-19-2024

THE 19TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 29TH PHALGUNA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 36878 OF 2023 PETITIONER/S: ROSHCO MUTUAL BENEFIT NIDHI LIMITED BUILDING NO.KMC XIII/666A, ROSHCO TOWER, NEAR KERALA KAUMUDI KOTTAYAM, OFF T B ROAD, KOTTAYAM 686 001,


May 21 2024

Evergreen Farmers Benefit Society vs Director of Agriculture

Court: Kerala

Decided on: May-21-2024

THE 21ST DAY OF MAY 2024 / 31ST VAISAKHA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 11741 OF 2017 PETITIONER/S: EVERGREEN FARMERS BENEFIT SOCIETY REG.NO.C.A396/2010, PALAKKAD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY SHRI.UDAYAPRAKASHAN, AGED 57 YEARS, S/O KUTTIKRISHNAN, PALANCHERIKALAM, NENMARA PO, KOLLENGODE, PIN-678506


Mar 19 2024

Roshco Mutual Benefit Nidhi Limited vs Union of India

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Mar-19-2024

THE 19TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 29TH PHALGUNA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 36878 OF 2023 PETITIONER/S: ROSHCO MUTUAL BENEFIT NIDHI LIMITED BUILDING NO.KMC XIII/666A, ROSHCO TOWER, NEAR KERALA KAUMUDI KOTTAYAM, OFF T B ROAD, KOTTAYAM 686 001,


Jul 30 2024

Griha Fin Benefit Funds Limited vs Union of India

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jul-30-2024

THE 30TH DAY OF JULY 2024 / 8TH SRAVANA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 27083 OF 2024 PETITIONER: GRIHA FIN BENEFIT FUNDS LIMITED DOOR NO.08/184, GOLD FORT BUILDING, BRIDGE ROAD, ALUVA MUNICIPALITY, FIRST FLOOR, ERNAKULAM REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING


Dec 05 2006

Sri Teja Benefit Fund Ltd., Represented by Its Director, B. Maruthi Sr ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Dec-05-2006

Reported in: 2007CriLJ1308

complaints would have to be held as validly filed and on that count, the accused cannot claim any benefit. We also hold that the act on the part of Court taking cognizance of the complaints has no


Apr 20 2007

Danvanti Mutual Benefits Limited Vs. State of Haryana and anr.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Apr-20-2007

Reported in: 2007CriLJ2596

ORDERT.P.S. Mann, J.1. The petitioner is seeking quashing of order passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaithal on 22-10-1999, while dismissing the complaint in default for want of prosecution and also the order passed by Additional Chief...


Oct 14 2004

Egmore Benefit Society Employees Union Vs. Govt. of Tamil Nadu (Rep. b ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-14-2004

Reported in: (2005)IILLJ254Mad

ORDERA.K. Rajan, J.1. Though notice has been served, nobody appeared on the side of the third respondent. Name of the third respondent has been printed in the case (sic) list. Even today also, there is no...


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial