Belting - Judgment Search Results
Pray Vs. Belt
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1828
Pray v. Belt - 26 U.S. 670 (1828) U.S. Supreme Court Pray v. Belt, 26 U.S. 1 Pet. 670 670 (1828)
United States Vs. Belt
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-07-1943
United States v. Belt - 319 U.S. 521 (1943) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Belt, 319 U.S. 521 (1943) United States
Robinson and Co. Vs. Belt
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Oct-27-1902
Robinson & Co. v. Belt - 187 U.S. 41 (1902) U.S. Supreme Court Robinson & Co. v. Belt, 187 U.S. 41 (1902) Robinson
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Nikasutapes Belt vs the State Tax Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-02-2026
JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY and WMP Nos. 19959 & 19960 of 2026 Nikasutapes Belt Represented by its Proprietor Mr.Karthikeyan Vellingiri No.6/268-W, Sri Krishna Paradise Kaveri Nagar, Pattanam to Vellalore Road Coimbatore 641
Somi Conveyor Beltings Ltd. & Anr. Vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-2017
DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1416/2016 & CM No.6194/2016 (stay) Pronounced on: April 11, 2017 SOMI CONVEYOR BELTINGS LTD. & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.T.S. Ramanathan, Adv. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Prakash,
Balaji Transmission Belting Co., Vs The Assistant Commissioner (ST),
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-02-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02.06.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY and Balaji Transmission Belting Co., Represented by its Proprietor, P BABU, Plot No.59-60, 66-99, 3rd Floor, Chamundi Complex, Omalur Main Road, Shankar
Mittal Belting and Machinery Stores Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax and ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-25-2001
Reported in: (2001)171CTR(P& H)451; [2002]253ITR341(P& H)
it was a device to save tax. It has also been contended that the present appellant, viz., Mittal Belting and Machinery Stores, had not filed any appeal before the Commissioner or the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal. The appeals
Conveyor Belt Manufacturers Association Vs. Govt. of India Through Sec ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-01-2002
Reported in: 2002VAD(Delhi)696; 2002(2)ARBLR214(Delhi); 97(2002)DLT865
a Request for Quotation (RFQ for short) on 6th January, 2001 in respect of their requirement for conveyor belts. This RFQ pertained to the period 2001-2002 and provided for a 'purchase preference' to Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs)
Ahmedabad Green Belt Khedut Mandal Vs. State of Gujarat Through Secret ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Nov-24-2000
Reported in: (2001)1GLR888
of communications; the allotment or reservation of land for roads, open spaces, gardens, recreation grounds, schools, markets, green belts, dairies, transport facilities, and public purposes of all kinds. The original Clause (jj), as was inserted by Gujarat
Webbing and Belting Factory (P) Ltd. and anr. Vs. C.M. Shashikumar
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-05-2005
Matched in: Parties Webbing and Belting Factory (P) Ltd. and anr. Vs. C.M. Shashikumar
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free