Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Before - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 27 2016

Rjee (Decd.) Vs. Before:

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Sep-27-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE TS11OF2013GA2761of 2016 IN THE GOODS OF: JYOTI PRAKASH BHATTACHA RJEE (DECD.) Versus BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE RANJIT KUMAR BAG Date : 27th September, 2016....


Feb 05 2014

“9. Before Parting with the Judgment It Is Worthwhile to Vs. Financi ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Feb-05-2014

CWP-10208 of 2013 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP No.10208 of 2014 Date of decision: February 05, 2014 Gulab Devi Sarpanch ...Petitioner Versus Financial Commissioner & Principal Secretary & another...


Oct 31 1977

State Representative Before S.T.A. Tribunal Vs. National Rubber Manufa ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Oct-31-1977

Reported in: [1978]42STC392(AP)

Obul Reddi, C.J.1. In these two revisions preferred by two different assessees, the common question that arises is whether the revisional order made by the Deputy Commissioner was time-barred. According to the learned counsel, Sri D....


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 13 1978

State Representative Before Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal Vs. Sanicons

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Dec-13-1978

Reported in: [1980]45STC234(AP)

A. Sambasiva Rao, C.J.1. The question raised in this tax revision case, though a very short one, is quite interesting. It is: 'Whether water-meters come within the ambit of item 102 or item 83 of the...


Apr 30 2009

Gudimetla Venkat Reddy Rep. by Its Proprietor Sri G. Venkat Reddy Vs. ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Apr-30-2009

Reported in: (2009)25VST178(AP)

Ramesh Ranganathan, J.1. Aggrieved by the order of the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam, in T.A. No. 704 of 2005 dated 12.12.2008, TREVC No. 62 of 2009 is filed. Seeking stay of collection of the disputed...


Jul 15 2008

Aruna Manure Works Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by the State R ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jul-15-2008

Reported in: (2009)19VST402(AP)

ORDERRamesh Ranganathan, J.1. This revision is preferred against the order of the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal (STAT), Hyderabad in T.A. No. 642 of 1993 dated 12.12.1994.2. The petitioner is a dealer carrying on business in bone...


Sep 26 2011

Cesc Limited Vs. Shiva Glass Vs. State of West Bengal and ors. Before:

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Sep-26-2011

1 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL APPELALTE JURISDICTION IN APPEAL FROM AN ORDER PASSED IN ITS CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT ORIGINAL SIDE G.A. No. 49 of 2009 A.P.O.T. No. 11 of 2009 (W.P. No. 278 of...


Mar 16 2012

M/S. Kec International Limited, Worli, Mumbai Represented by Its Manag ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Mar-16-2012

COMMON ORDER:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice V.V.S. Rao) These two tax revision cases under Section 22(1) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 (the Act) are against the common order dated 20.2.2009 in T.A.Nos.671 and...


Jun 13 2012

M/S. Reckitt Benckiser (India) Ltd., Old Bowenpally, Secunderabad Repr ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jun-13-2012

M/s. Reckitt Benckiser (India) Limited (hereafter, the manufacturer) is engaged in the manufacture and sale of Lizol (floor cleaner), Harpic (toilet cleaner) and Mortein mosquito repellents. Whether these goods are exigible to value added tax @...


May 01 2013

“The Applicants Are Directed to Put in Appearance Before the Vs. Sta ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: May-01-2013

CRM not M-6954 of 2013 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CRM not M-6954 of 2013 Date of decision :1. 5.2013 Amritpal Singh and others .........Petitioners versus State of Punjab...


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial