Battery - Judgment Search Results

Acme Batteries (P) Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1992)LC355Tri(Delhi)

on batteries alone, setting aside the demand in respect of battery plates. In the impugned order both findings are against the

Toshiba Anand Batteries Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1986)(10)ECC256

battery specified in Sub-item (1). Whenever one speaks of a battery one understands it to mean two or more similar units

Matsushita Lakhanpal Battery (i) Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2004)(95)ECC291

is specified in column 3 of the table, certain Dry Battery Cells are being rejected on account of numerous reasons will

Amco Batteries Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (1997)(93)ELT441Tri(Chennai)

components which remain to make the battery functional are the battery portion which has been formed by joining the terminals, the

Hbl Aircraft Batteries Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (1998)(59)ECC207

to the Defence in the price to be charged per battery. The appellants while invoicing the goods to the Defence, took

Standard Batteries Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in: (1985)11ITD309(Mum.)

that the assessee was ensuring was probably larger supplies of batteries. The transaction, which the assessee had, was in its own

Punjab Anand Batteries Vs. Assistant Collector of C. Ex.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: 1991LC515(P& H); 1992(58)ELT28(P& H)

it is used in the manufacture of a dry cell battery. M/s. Peico Limited would market the dry cell batteries under

Amco Batteries (P) Ltd. Vs. Assistant Collector, Central Excise and an ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 1979(4)ELT451(Kar)

11. But in determining the 'wholesale cash price' of the Batteries in question on the relevant dates, the Excise Authorities have

The Manager, Battery World Kattappana Vs. Shiji Joseph

Court: Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram

minimum period of one year. But after 6 months the battery had to be recharged and Rs.200/- was charged from the

Amco Batteries Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (1996)LC111Tri(Chennai)

charging of the battery is an operation to make the battery functional and therefore the character of the goods by charging