Battery - Judgment Search Results

Amco Batteries Limited, Bangalore Vs. Collector of Central Excise, Ban ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2003SC1853; 2003(4)ECC86; 2003(153)ELT7(SC); JT2003(2)SC291; 2003(2)SCALE440; (2003)4SCC41; [2003]2SCR342

attract consequences.2. Short facts of the case are that appellant is engaged inmanufacture of lead acid electric storage batteries and parts thereoffalling under Tariff Heading 85.07 in its two factories, one at Hebbaland other at Mysore Road

Toshiba Anand Batteries Ltd., Anand House, CochIn Vs. Collector of Cus ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1991(51)ELT200(SC); JT1991(1)SC14; 1990(2)SCALE1293; 1992Supp(1)SCC38; [1990]Supp3SCR614; 1991(1)LC375(SC)

sodium chloride and magnesium dioxide, whether or not chemically pure, and other product falling within Section V'. Since battery grade manganese dioxide finds a place in Chapter 25 as indicated above, it is argued, it is clearly

Standard Batteries Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1994)119CTR(SC)353; [1995]211ITR444(SC)

M.N. Venkatachaliah, C.J.I.1. The petitioner seeks special leave to appeal directly from the order dated January 1, 1992, of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Bombay Bench 'A', Bombay, declining to state a case and refer a question...

Amman Batteries Vs The Deputy State Tax Officer 2

Court: Chennai

C. SARAVANAN WP No. 946 of 2026 & WMP Nos. 1143 OF 2026 & 1144 OF 2026 Amman Batteries, Represented by its partner Tamil Selvan Sureshkumar, No.1, Ground Floor, NVK Complex, OPP State Bank of India, Harur,

Saj Batteries Vs. State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

-------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN TA (V2762013 of KERALA VAT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM DATED2606-2013 REVISION PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- SAJ BATTERIES PRIVATE LIMITED, 18/1490, KALLUTHANKADAVU, PUTHIYARA.P.O., CALICUT673004, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, SMT.ALIYAMMA JOSEPH. BY ADV. SMT.INDU SUSAN JACOB

Amco Batteries Ltd Vs. Commissioner of Value Added Tax

Court: Delhi

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:4. h March, 2014 % + ST.APPL. 35/2013 AMCO BATTERIES LTD ..... Petitioner Through Mr Virag Tiwari, Mr Rajesh Jain and Mr K J Bhat, Advs. versus COMMISSIONER

J.K. Batteries Vs. Parasmal Jain

Court: Madhya Pradesh

ground that the plaintiff is a company registered under the Companies Act and deals with the business of batteries. It was pleaded that the plaintiff appointed the defendants as distributors for Madras region in May, 1981. It

Ravi Alias Battery Ravi Vs. State of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K. SOMASHEKAR CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1364 of 2012 BETWEEN: RAVI ALIAS BATTERY RAVI AGED ABOUT28YEARS, S/O PUTTARAJU, R/AT SARASWATHIPURAM COLONY, HUNSUR TOWN, MYSURU - 571 105. (BY SRI. P. NATARAJU,

Firefly Batteries Pvt Ltd vs P. Sudhakaran & Anr.

Court: Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 43/2026 FIREFLY BATTERIES PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr Narender Singh Yadav and Mr.Manu Prakash Upadhyay, Advocates.versusP. SUDHAKARAN & ANR. .....Respondents Through:CORAM:HON'BLE

Amara Raja Batteries Limited, vs the Deputy Commissioner,

Court: Kerala

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI MONDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023 / 17TH MAGHA, 1944 PETITIONER: AMARA RAJA BATTERIES LIMITED, 2ND FLOOR, THOMSON BUILDING, CHERUPARAMBATH ROAD, KADAVANTHRA, KOCHI- 682020, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. REPRESENTED BY MR. UMESH.T.- AUTHORISED SIGNATORY