Basic Slag - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: basic slag Year: 2010 Page 1 of about 1,012 results (0.133 seconds)Special Land Acquisition Officer Vs. Karigowda and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-26-2010
reference court and as upheld by the high court the basic error of law to which the courts below have fallen
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHolland Vs. Florida
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-14-2010
501 u s 722 756 757 1991 emphasis added the basic rationale for lawrence s holding is that the mistakes of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGlanrock Estate (P) Ltd Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu .
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-09-2010
of fundamental right may not therefore ipso facto violate the basic structure doctrine but a law which violates the basic structure
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTA. Vijaya Raghavan, Vs. Union of India, Rep., by the Secretary, Minist ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam
Decided on: Jun-24-2010
shah hyder beiq 2000 1 scale 124 above being the basic tenet of law employee was required to show reason for
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Bihar and ors. Vs. Kalyanpur Cements Ltd.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-08-2010
Reported in: JT2010(1)SC225; 2010(1)SCALE150; 2010(1)LC348(SC); (2010)28VST1(SC)
a representation made by the state is founded on the basic concept of justice and fair play the attempt to take
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBudge Budge Refineries Ltd. Vs. Virgoe Oil and Fats Pte. Ltd. and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-21-2010
the court the plaintiff claims that the first defendant has attempted to foist contracts on the plaintiff when in fact...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri Samir Ghosh Vs. the State of TripurA.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Jun-07-2010
1 the above mentioned two writ appeals have arisen out of the common judgment and order dated 15 6 07...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTT. Subramanian Vs. Deputy Commercial Tax Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-14-2010
1 this common order shall dispose of w p nos 398 to 400 of 2006 as common question of law...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Central Excise Jallandhar Vs. M/S. Ambika Overseas
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jul-20-2010
respondents is not a service provider per se they are basically the service recipients they are required to pay the service
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAssistant Commercial Taxes Officer Vs. Kansai Nerolac Paints Ltd.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-15-2010
swatanter kumar j 1 delay condoned 2 leave granted 3 we may notice necessary facts giving rise to the present...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial