Basic Slag - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: basic slag Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 458 results (0.136 seconds)Minwool Rock Fibres Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Aug-22-2002
Reported in: (2002)(84)ECC336
..... question it was explained that the slagwool was produced basically from blast furnace slag it was also noted that the goods were marketed ..... the classification and whether they do not otherwise require thus the basic issue is whether the classification of the goods in question ..... though containing more than 25 by weight of blast furnace slag etc will appropriately be classifiable under heading 68 03 5 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLeelamma Devassia Vs. Sr. Supdt. of Post Offices and ors.
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam
Decided on: Dec-18-2002
Reported in: (2004)(2)SLJ244CAT
000 on completion of 26 years of service in the basic cadre of postal assistant and tbop put together under bcr
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSwil Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Decided on: Nov-13-2002
Reported in: (2003)(154)ELT288Tri(Kol.)kata
is demandable as the duty was leviable 15 of the basic excise duty which was nil during the first three financial
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Bemcee Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-01-2002
Reported in: (2003)(151)ELT545Tri(Mum.)bai
goods in specific and general category does not alter the basic character of leviability the duty is attracted not because an
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKalyanpur Cements Ltd. Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Apr-24-2002
observed that the stand of the revenue suffers from certain basic fallacies besides being wholly technical the apex court observed that
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGuru Refractories Vs. State of M.P. and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-25-2002
Reported in: 2002(4)MPHT17
it was observed that cast iron castings is in its basic and rough form it was held by the supreme court
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner, Commercial Taxes and anr. Vs. Super Syncotex (India) Ltd ...
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Feb-15-2002
Reported in: RLW2003(2)Raj1161; [2003]130STC186(Raj); 2002(5)WLN363
1 these three writ petitions raise a common question about the interpretation of term expansion and the conditions to be...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRoyal Pvc Shoes Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-17-2002
Reported in: RLW2003(1)Raj250; [2004]138STC224(Raj); 2002(2)WLC698; 2002(2)WLN692
balia j 1 heard learned counsel for the parties 2 the writ petition no 3971 2000 was filed by the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Associated Cement Companies Ltd. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Nov-27-2002
nagendra rai j 1 the petitioner has filed the present writ application forquashing the order dated 20th november 2001 passed...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSiddeshwara and Co. Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-28-2002
Reported in: [2004]134STC270(Kar)
orderg c bharuka j 1 these petitions which have been filed under section 23 1 of the karnataka sales tax...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial