Basic Slag - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: basic slag Year: 2006 Page 1 of about 2,007 results (0.127 seconds)L. Ibohalbi Singh and ors. Vs. Director of Health Services and ors.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Nov-14-2006
those male health workers who have not successfully completed the basic training course for one year 2 to issue a writ
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRaghuraj Pratap Singh and ors. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Ta ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jul-14-2006
Reported in: (2009)222CTR(All)153; [2009]179TAXMAN73(All)
is expressly absolved from his duty by a statute the basic principle behind the aforesaid maxim is that a discretion conferred
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJsw Steel Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Central
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Jun-08-2006
Reported in: (2006)(111)ECC363
..... in the course of manufacture of steel they are granulated slag non granulated slag and corex gas the present appeal is in respect of ..... even if such intermediate is exempt from payment of duty the basic idea is that cenvat credit is admissible so long as the ..... the revenue itself in subsequent period has held that non granulated slag is not excisable in these circumstances the appellants have a strong .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSilk and Textiles Mercantile Traders Assn. Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi a ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-19-2006
Reported in: 139(2007)DLT393; 2007(207)ELT482(Del); (2007)6VST444(Delhi)
well as from additional duty under the ade act as basic as well as additional excise duties have been totally exempted
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJ.K. Synthetics Limited and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2006
Reported in: 138(2007)DLT660; 2006(204)ELT369(Del)
the notification dated 20 10 1982 enhancing the rate of basic customs duty on imported caprolactum from 55 to 75 the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRameshwara Jute Mills Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Nov-23-2006
by mr prasad but mr agrawal pointed out that the basic differences between the reported decision and the case in hand
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVicnivas Agency Rep. by Its Managing Partner Mr. Pon Kumar Vs. the Sta ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-19-2006
Reported in: (2007)8VST53(Mad)
orderk raviraja pandian j 1 the above writ petition is filed for issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUttam Agencies Vs. Govt of Nct of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2006
Reported in: 130(2006)DLT672
shiv narayan dhingra j 1 tea was liable for sales tax as part of kiryana goods from 1986 onwards vide...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTvl. Ayyappan Textiles Limited, Rep. by the Director Vs. the State of ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-13-2006
Reported in: (2006)3MLJ1001
m karpagavinayagam j 1 the validity of section 3 a of the tamil nadu electricity taxation on consumption act 1962...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCarborundum Universal Ltd. Vs. State of Kerala
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jul-06-2006
Reported in: [2006]148STC339(Ker)
k s radhakrishnan j 1 the assessee is a company engaged in the manufacture of aluminium oxide granules at edappally...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial