Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Banking Limitation - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 31 2023

Hdfc Bank Limited, vs ICICI Bank Limited,

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Oct-31-2023

TUESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2023 / 9TH KARTHIKA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 38548 OF 2022 PETITIONER: HDFC BANK LIMITED, KATTAKKADA BRANCH, DOOR NO.3/451-B, GROUND FLOOR, SOORYA PLAZA, KATTAKKADA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROJECT MANAGER, NAGENDRAN M.N, … THE 31ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2023 / 9TH KARTHIKA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 38548 OF 2022 PETITIONER: HDFC BANK LIMITED, KATTAKKADA BRANCH, DOOR NO.3/451-B, GROUND FLOOR, SOORYA PLAZA, KATTAKKADA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROJECT MANAGER, NAGENDRAN M.N, AGED


Dec 31 1969

The Himalaya Bank Limited Vs. the Simla Bank Limited and anr.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Dec-31-1969

Reported in: (1886)ILR8All23

in favour of the plaintiff. The real question in the case is, whether the title of the Himalaya Bank or that of the Simla Bank should prevail with respect to the mortgages executed by the defendant, Mrs.


Feb 04 2005

icici Bank Limited Vs. Federal Bank Limited

Court: Company Law Board CLB

Decided on: Feb-04-2005

Reported in: (2006)65SCL5

ICICI Limited was allotted 26,67,000 equity shares in the year 1993. Since in terms of Section 12(2) of Banking Regulation Act, no one holding shares in the bank could exercise voting rights in excess of 1 per … 1. CP 42 of 2004 (the first petition) has been filed by ICICI Bank Limited holding 45,32,400 shares constituting 20.4 per cent shares in the Federal Bank Limited (the Bank) alleging that in


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 14 2000

The Federal Bank Limited, Aluva, Kerala Vs. the Shamrao Vithal Co-oper ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jul-14-2000

Reported in: [2001]106CompCas419(Kar); ILR2000KAR4278; 2000(5)KarLJ242

ORDER1. The Federal Bank Limited through its Chief Manager Sri George John is before this Court in a petition filed under Article … ORDER1. The Federal Bank Limited through its Chief Manager Sri George John is before this Court in a petition filed under Article 226


May 15 2002

Howrah District Central Co-operative Bank Limited Employees' Union Vs. ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: May-15-2002

Reported in: [2002(95)FLR569],(2002)IIILLJ760Cal

annexure P-13 to the writ petition that the Deputy Labour Commissioner, Howrah, has written to the concerned co-operative bank requesting them not to take any action that might stand in the way of maintaining a cordial atmosphere


Oct 10 1939

Urban Co-operative Bank, Limited Vs. Honavar Havik Co-operative Bank, ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Oct-10-1939

Reported in: AIR1940Bom190; (1940)42BOMLR218

rateable distribution of certain assets under Section 73 of the Civil Procedure Code. Several persons as well as banks had obtained decrees against one Madappa Hegde who was a member of a joint Hindu family. The petitioner


Dec 15 2017

Macquarie Bank Limited Vs. Shilpi Cable Technologies Ltd

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Dec-15-2017

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.15135 OF2017MACQUARIE BANK LIMITED …APPELLANT VERSUS SHILPI CABLE TECHNOLOGIES LTD. ...RESPONDENT WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.15481 OF2017CIVIL APPEAL NO.15447 OF2017JUDGMENT R.F. Nariman, … REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.15135 OF2017MACQUARIE BANK LIMITED …APPELLANT VERSUS SHILPI CABLE TECHNOLOGIES LTD. ...RESPONDENT WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.15481 OF2017CIVIL APPEAL NO.15447 OF2017JUDGMENT R.F. Nariman, J.1.


Feb 25 2022

Nkgsb Cooperative Bank Limited Vs. Subir Chakravarty

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Feb-25-2022

one of the key drivers in India's efforts to achieve success in rapidly developing its economy. While the banking industry in India is progressively complying with the international prudential norms and accounting practices there are certain areas … subsisting security interest over such properties and the claim of the Bank or Financial Institution is within the limitation period; (iii) the borrower has created security interest over various properties giving the details of properties referred to


Aug 05 2022

Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited Vs. Kew Precision Parts Private Limited

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-05-2022

be paid on or before 31st December, 2018.14. The Corporate Debtor alleges that there were deficiencies in the banking services rendered by the Appellant Financier. Be that as it may, the Corporate Debtor availed credit facilities from … CIRP at the material time. The Adjudicating Authority also has to examine if the application is barred by limitation.15. Pre-existing disputes, if any, between the Corporate Debtor and the Financial Creditor are of no consequence to an


Feb 03 2022

Induslnd Bank Limited Vs. Simarjit Singh

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Feb-03-2022

NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.784 OF2022INDUSIND BANK LIMITED AND ANOTHER ..... A P PELLANTS VERSUS SIMARJIT SINGH ..... R ESPONDENT JUDGMENT SANJIV KHANNA, J.In July … NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.784 OF2022INDUSIND BANK LIMITED AND ANOTHER ..... A P PELLANTS VERSUS SIMARJIT SINGH ..... R ESPONDENT JUDGMENT SANJIV KHANNA, J.In July 2006,


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial