Banking Limitation - Judgment Search Results
Hdfc Bank Limited, vs ICICI Bank Limited,
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Oct-31-2023
TUESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2023 / 9TH KARTHIKA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 38548 OF 2022 PETITIONER: HDFC BANK LIMITED, KATTAKKADA BRANCH, DOOR NO.3/451-B, GROUND FLOOR, SOORYA PLAZA, KATTAKKADA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROJECT MANAGER, NAGENDRAN M.N, … THE 31ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2023 / 9TH KARTHIKA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 38548 OF 2022 PETITIONER: HDFC BANK LIMITED, KATTAKKADA BRANCH, DOOR NO.3/451-B, GROUND FLOOR, SOORYA PLAZA, KATTAKKADA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROJECT MANAGER, NAGENDRAN M.N, AGED
The Himalaya Bank Limited Vs. the Simla Bank Limited and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-31-1969
Reported in: (1886)ILR8All23
in favour of the plaintiff. The real question in the case is, whether the title of the Himalaya Bank or that of the Simla Bank should prevail with respect to the mortgages executed by the defendant, Mrs.
icici Bank Limited Vs. Federal Bank Limited
Court: Company Law Board CLB
Decided on: Feb-04-2005
Reported in: (2006)65SCL5
ICICI Limited was allotted 26,67,000 equity shares in the year 1993. Since in terms of Section 12(2) of Banking Regulation Act, no one holding shares in the bank could exercise voting rights in excess of 1 per … 1. CP 42 of 2004 (the first petition) has been filed by ICICI Bank Limited holding 45,32,400 shares constituting 20.4 per cent shares in the Federal Bank Limited (the Bank) alleging that in
18-section briefs on any result in this list
The Federal Bank Limited, Aluva, Kerala Vs. the Shamrao Vithal Co-oper ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-14-2000
Reported in: [2001]106CompCas419(Kar); ILR2000KAR4278; 2000(5)KarLJ242
ORDER1. The Federal Bank Limited through its Chief Manager Sri George John is before this Court in a petition filed under Article … ORDER1. The Federal Bank Limited through its Chief Manager Sri George John is before this Court in a petition filed under Article 226
Howrah District Central Co-operative Bank Limited Employees' Union Vs. ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-15-2002
Reported in: [2002(95)FLR569],(2002)IIILLJ760Cal
annexure P-13 to the writ petition that the Deputy Labour Commissioner, Howrah, has written to the concerned co-operative bank requesting them not to take any action that might stand in the way of maintaining a cordial atmosphere
Urban Co-operative Bank, Limited Vs. Honavar Havik Co-operative Bank, ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-10-1939
Reported in: AIR1940Bom190; (1940)42BOMLR218
rateable distribution of certain assets under Section 73 of the Civil Procedure Code. Several persons as well as banks had obtained decrees against one Madappa Hegde who was a member of a joint Hindu family. The petitioner
Macquarie Bank Limited Vs. Shilpi Cable Technologies Ltd
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-15-2017
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.15135 OF2017MACQUARIE BANK LIMITED …APPELLANT VERSUS SHILPI CABLE TECHNOLOGIES LTD. ...RESPONDENT WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.15481 OF2017CIVIL APPEAL NO.15447 OF2017JUDGMENT R.F. Nariman, … REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.15135 OF2017MACQUARIE BANK LIMITED …APPELLANT VERSUS SHILPI CABLE TECHNOLOGIES LTD. ...RESPONDENT WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.15481 OF2017CIVIL APPEAL NO.15447 OF2017JUDGMENT R.F. Nariman, J.1.
Nkgsb Cooperative Bank Limited Vs. Subir Chakravarty
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-25-2022
one of the key drivers in India's efforts to achieve success in rapidly developing its economy. While the banking industry in India is progressively complying with the international prudential norms and accounting practices there are certain areas … subsisting security interest over such properties and the claim of the Bank or Financial Institution is within the limitation period; (iii) the borrower has created security interest over various properties giving the details of properties referred to
Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited Vs. Kew Precision Parts Private Limited
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-05-2022
be paid on or before 31st December, 2018.14. The Corporate Debtor alleges that there were deficiencies in the banking services rendered by the Appellant Financier. Be that as it may, the Corporate Debtor availed credit facilities from … CIRP at the material time. The Adjudicating Authority also has to examine if the application is barred by limitation.15. Pre-existing disputes, if any, between the Corporate Debtor and the Financial Creditor are of no consequence to an
Induslnd Bank Limited Vs. Simarjit Singh
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-03-2022
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.784 OF2022INDUSIND BANK LIMITED AND ANOTHER ..... A P PELLANTS VERSUS SIMARJIT SINGH ..... R ESPONDENT JUDGMENT SANJIV KHANNA, J.In July … NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.784 OF2022INDUSIND BANK LIMITED AND ANOTHER ..... A P PELLANTS VERSUS SIMARJIT SINGH ..... R ESPONDENT JUDGMENT SANJIV KHANNA, J.In July 2006,
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free