Bangle - Judgment Search Results

Lakshmi Bangle Stores Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: II(1991)ACC1; 1991ACJ262; JT1990(4)SC614; 1990(2)SCALE1187; (1991)1SCC448; [1990]Supp3SCR457

Kuldip Singh, J.1. Messrs Lakshmi Bangle Stores instituted a suit for damages against the Eastern Railway and the South-Eastern Railway through Union of India.

Shiva Bangles Stores and anr. Vs. Industrial Tribunal (ii) U.P. and or ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1972SC1902; (1972)IILLJ50SC; (1973)3SCC899; 1972(4)LC861(SC)

ORDER1. In this appeal by Special leave the Appellant challenges the order of the High Court more or less dismissing in limine the Civil Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 4025. of 1970 filed by the Appellant for...

Ali Bangle Store, vs State Tax Officer,

Court: Kerala

NAIDU FRIDAY, THE 04TH DAY OF JANUARY 2019 / 14TH POUSHA, 1940 WP(C).No. 103 of 2019 PETITIONER: ALI BANGLE STORE,TC 38/1713, CHANDRA PRESS COMPOUND, CHALAI, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN CODE - 695 523, REPRESENTED BY PARNTER MANSOOR. BY ADVS.

Mysore Bangle Works Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1985KAR1506; [1986]157ITR411(KAR); [1986]157ITR411(Karn)

Matched in: Parties Mysore Bangle Works Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Brindavan Bangle Stores Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1995KAR1391

J. 1. In these petitions, the question raised is, whether the circular issued by the Commissioner that plastic bangles and glass bangles attract tax under the Karnataka Tax on Entry of Goods Act, 1979 ('the Act', for

Mahaveer Bangles Vs. Commercial Tax Officer, Tarapet, Vijayawada

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: [1993]91STC168(AP)

to the facts of the case. The writ petitioner is a registered dealer doing business in plastic goods, bangles, leather goods, etc., at Vijayawada. He submits monthly returns as required by the A.P. General Sales Tax Rules,

New Kailash Bangles Stores Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: [1986]63STC156(AP)

The facts lie in a short compass and they are stated thus. The petitioner is a dealer in bangles. While submitting its returns of net turnover sought exemption of a turnover of Rs. 1,94,563.42 on the premise

Lakshmi Bangle Stores Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1975AP235

Chinnappa Reddy, J. 1. The plaintiff, a bangle seller of Amadalavalsa purchased glass bangles at Ferozabad under bills Exs. A-9 to A-27 for a sum of

Celluloid Bangle Works Vs. the State of Bombay

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: [1962]13STC611(Bom)

This is a reference under section 34(2) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953. The applicant Messrs Celluloid Bangle Works is a proprietary concern doing the business of manufacturing bangles and selling them in the market. According

The Swan Bangle Stores Vs. Assistant Sales Tax Officer and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: [1970]25STC122(All)

facts are set out in the judgment proposed by my brother Gulati.2. The question is whether plain glass bangles and ornamented glass bangles are to be regarded as essentially the same commercial commodity or can they be