Bail Bond - Judgment Search Results
State Through C.B.i. Vs. Amarmani Tripathi
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-26-2005
Reported in: AIR2005SC3490; 2005(3)BLJR2084; 2005CriLJ4149; 123(2005)DLT362(SC); 2005(85)DRJ227; JT2005(8)SC517; 2005(7)SCALE489; (2005)8SCC21; MANU/SC/0677/2005
and No. 1954(B)/2004 releasing the accused Amarmani Tripathi (Accused No. 5) and Madhumani Tripathi (Accused No. 40 on bail have filed these appeals.3. On 9th May, 2003 Madhumita Shukla was shot dead in her house located in … dated 29th April, 2004 and 8th July, 2004 passed by the High Court are set aside. The bail bonds of the respondents in each of these cases are cancelled, Respondents are directed to surrender forthwith and in
Hamida Vs. Rashid @ Rasheed and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-27-2007
Reported in: 105(2008)CLT410(SC); 2007CriLJ3422; JT2007(6)SC392; 2007(6)SCALE517; (2008)1SCC474
certain directions. By the impugned order it was directed that the accused respondents, who had been initially granted bail in offences under Sections 324, 352 and 506 IPC by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarnagar, would continue to … after the offence had been converted to one under Section 304 IPC, if they furnished the requisite personal bonds and sureties before the concerned Court. 3. The appellant Hamida lodged an FIR at P.S. Kotwali, Muzaffarnagar at
Gyan Chandra Agrawal Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: May-07-2007
Reported in: 2007CriLJ2851; 2007(3)MPHT54
bail under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure by the Magistrate and who did not furnish bail bond for a long time pursuant to the order and a charge-sheet was filed, in the meanwhile, can be … and a charge-sheet was filed, in the meanwhile, can be subsequently released on such bail on his furnishing bail-bond on the strength of the earlier order ?, is a short question raised for consideration in this petition.2.
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Bhoja Babu Salian Vs. State of Maharashtra
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-07-1983
Reported in: 1983(2)BomCR165
reason for the absence of the accused on 30-6-1982. As the surety has not shown any cause, the bail bond is forfeited. However, I shall grant time to produce the accused by the next date. Adjd. to 20-7-1982.'The … in response to the show cause notice served on the petitioner by the Court.10. Application dismissed. Criminal - bail bond - Sections 467, 457, 458, 461, 472 and 419 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 446 of Criminal
Dr. Chimanlal Dharamdas Shah Vs. State
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-19-1987
Reported in: 1987(2)BomCR264; 1989(20)LC372(Bombay); 1988(36)ELT238(Bom); 1987MhLJ336
On the subsequent date the detenu had defaulted in appearing in pursuance of the terms of his earlier bail bond on 3rd December, 1985 to answer the charge and thereafter also he repeatedly remained absent and in view … of the learned counsel, I have gone through the records of this case as well as the original bail bond and the surety bond executed by the original accused and the surety petitioner respectively.7. It was contended on
Dhani Ram Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-1973
Reported in: 9(1973)DLT255; 1973RLR141
set aside to the extent to which it contains the direction that the petitioner Dhani Ram may furnish bail bond for his continuous appearance in Court on the dates on which the procedings may be taken up. (3) … the ultimate part of the order, reproduced above, whereby Dhani Ram had been ordered to execute a personal bail bond in the sum of Rs. 3000.00 with one surety in the like amount for appearance in Court. (5)
Sripal Singh and anr. Vs. the State
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Apr-23-1952
Reported in: AIR1953All187
was proceeding in the Court of the Judicial Magistrate III, Hardoi. Each of the aforenamed sureties executed a bail bond for Rs. 1500/- on 30th October 1950, but no personal bond was taken from Aughar Nath in pursuance … the contrary. In --'Emperor v. Prabhu Dayal', 40 All 825, it was held that under the terms of bail bond a joint surety was responsible for the production of the accused notwithstanding the failure of the accused to
In Re: Ramanath Bholgothra (of Jammu)
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-17-1953
Reported in: AIR1953Mad953; (1953)2MLJ399
of 1953. The bail bonds executed by the petitioner and by the sureties will be cancelled. Criminal - bail bond - Sections 1, 6 and 93A of Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 and Section 7 of Madras City Police
Behari Lal Chatterjee and Rash Behari Sen Vs. Emperor
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-12-1909
Reported in: (1909)ILR36Cal749
his order, dated the 5th March 1909, directing forfeiture of ten per cent, of the amount of each bail-bond, executed by the petitioners on behalf of certain accused persons, should not be set aside.2. We do not
State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Kanda Gopaludu
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-27-2005
Reported in: AIR2005SC3616; 2006(1)ALD(Cri)279; JT2006(2)SC412; (2005)13SCC116
trial court recording the conviction of the accused is restored. The accused, Kanda Gopaludu is on bail, his bail bond and surety stand cancelled. He is directed to be taken into custody forthwith. Compliance within one month.13. The … grave error in law as well as in facts - Impugned order of High Court set aside - Bail bond and surety cancelled - Appeal allowed. - ARBITRATION & CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 [C.A. No. 26/1996]. Section 11: [G.P.
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free