Backed - Judgment Search Results

M/S. Back Water Ripples Pvt. Ltd., vs Jayathilak I.a.S

Court: Kerala

JANUARY 2024 / 14TH POUSHA, 1945 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT WP(C) 25276/2023 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONERS:1 M/S. BACK WATER RIPPLES PVT. LTD., KUMARKOM P.O, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN-686563 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, ALEX MATHEW VELLAPPALLY, AGED

Back Water Ripples Pvt. Ltd., vs State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 18TH SRAVANA, 1945 PETITIONERS:1 BACK WATER RIPPLES PVT. LTD., KUMARKOM P.O, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN-686563 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, ALEX MATHEW VELLAPPALLY, AGED

Service Though Back Wages Were Denied to them. Vs. the State of Haryan ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

retrenchment. The respondents were ordered to be reinstated with continuity of LPA No.836 of 2013 (O&M) [2].service though back wages were denied to them. It is also not in dispute that the State Government issued a policy

Janki Back Vs. State of Chhattisgarh

Court: Chhattisgarh

dead body in the well with a view to conceal the evidence of criminal case. Yuvraj (PW-1) came back to his house, he was under fear and on being asked, he did not inform his father about

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-6, Delhi vs.nt Back Office Services Pvt ...

Court: Delhi

TAX-6, DELHI ..... Appellant ITA13072018 Through: Mr. Asheesh Jain, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr.Dushyant Sarna, Adv. versus NT BACK OFFICE SERVICES PVT. LTD (EARLIER KNOWN AS GLOBERIAN INDIA PVT. LTD.) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Deepak Chopra and

State of Kerala vs M/S. Back Water Ripples Pvt. Ltd

Court: Kerala

CIVIL STATION P.O, KOTTAYAM., PIN - 686001 BY SRI.T.K. VIPIN DAS, SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADERRESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONERS IN W.P.(C): 1 M/S. BACK WATER RIPPLES PVT. LTD KUMARAKOM P.O, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN-686563 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, ALEX MATHEW VELLAPPALLY, AGED

M-Star Hotels Koduvayur Pvt Ltd vs Back Water Studio

Court: Kerala

MR. ARUN BABY S/O RAMACHANDRAN, EDAKKAD VEDU, CHITHALI, KUZHALMANNAM,, PALAKKAD, PIN - BY ADVS. SUSEEL M.MENON J.VISHNURESPONDENTS: 1 BACK WATER STUDIO REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED RESPRESENTATIVE JAYALAL MENON, S/O NARAYANA MENON, M.M.BUILDING,NEAR STONE BRIDGE, ALAPUZHA, PIN -

State of A.P. Vs. Sol Back Bay Acqua Limited, Hyderabad

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2001(1)ALD494; 2001(1)ALT602; 2001CriLJ1107

only then the breach of such undertaking constitutes the act of the contempt of Court. 9. In the background of the principle laid down by the Supreme Court, even if the respondent herein had not given such

The Land of the Petitioners Was Acquired Way Back Vs. Paramjit and Oth ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

the accuracy of this order Chandigarh CWP No.9919 of 2014 [2].The land of the petitioners was acquired way back in the year 1987-88 followed by Award dated 12.04.1990 (Annexure P-4) for the development of Residential and Commercial

Terai Overseas Ltd. Vs. O.S. Draw Back Deptt.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 1997(96)ELT250(Cal)

ORDERVinod Kumar Gupta, J.1. The only grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner's claim for receiving drawback under the Customs & Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 1995, despite pending for a long time, has not...