Ayodhya Prasad Singh V State - Judgment Search Results
Satpal and ors. Vs. State of U.P.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Apr-24-2000
Reported in: 2000CriLJ3355
defence.20. Moreover, it has been held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Ayodhya Ram alias Ayodhya Prasad Singh v. State of Bihar 1999 SCC (Cri) 564 : (1999 AIR SCW 4733) that the prosecution is not bound to
Ravishwar Manjhi and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-12-2008
Reported in: AIR2009SC1262; 2008(16)SCALE45; 2009(2)LHSC880; 2009AIRSCW575
nature of injuries suffered by the appellants, relying on the decision of this Court in Ayodhya Ram alias Ayodhya Prasad Singh and Ors. v. State of Bihar : 1999CriLJ5005 , wherein only minor injuries were suffered by the accused
Amiya Charan Jena Vs. Managing Director, Orissa Handloom Development C ...
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Oct-09-1996
Reported in: 1997(I)OLR506
inquiry. But, in this judgment, the relevant rule was riot quoted.22. Another Division Bench of this Court in Ayodhya Prasad Singh v. Registrar, Co-op. Societies, Orissa and Ors. : AIR 1970 Ori. 201, held that when under the terms of … been confirmed. In coming to the above decision, the apex Court relied on the earlier decisions in Sukhbans Singh v. State of Punjab : AIR 1962 SC 177 ; G. S. Ramaswamy v. inspector-General of Police, Masore State. Bangalore
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Rama Goswami Vs. Lakshmi Kanta Roy and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-09-2004
Reported in: (2005)2CALLT451(HC),2005(4)CHN471
Nadar and Ors. v. Gopala Krishnan and Anr. reported in JT 2002 (suppl. 1) SC 474 and Bindeshwari Prasad Singh v. State of Bihar reported in 2002 Cri LJ 3788.11. He contended that the Supreme Court in Akalu Ahir (supra) … is not only done to the accused but it is equally done to the de facto complainant. In Ayodhya Dube v. Ram Sumer Singh reported in AIR 1981 SC 1415 the Supreme Court observed that when the
Krishna Bhagwan Agarwal and Another Vs. Ist Additional District Judge, ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Apr-19-1999
Reported in: 1999(2)AWC1753
writ jurisdiction came to be considered. In that case the following observations of the Apex Court in Swarana Singh v. State of Punjab. AIR 1975 SC 232, were noticed :'It is well-settled that certiorari jurisdiction can be exercised only … and assets between the partners.2. The woodcut profile of the case is that a firm known as M/s. Ayodhya Prasad and Sons, a partnership firm was constituted and brought into existence for carrying on the business in Burmah
Krishna Bhagwan Agarwal and Another Vs. Ist Additional District Judge, ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-15-1999
Reported in: 1999(3)AWC1986
justified only when circumstances of a substantial and compelling character make it necessary to do so : Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan. : [1965]1SCR933 . For instance, if the attention of the Court is not drawn to a … Kumar Agarwal plaintiff-respondent No. 2 were appointed as the joint receivers of the partnership business of firm M/s. Ayodhya Prasad and Sons which has branch business establishments at Bilsi, Sahaswan, Ujhiani, Delhi, Kasganj, and Bisawali. The order dated
Parmeshwar Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Aug-05-2008
Reported in: 2008CriLJ4190
same can be relied upon and a conviction can be founded thereon.'9. Further in the matter of Narayan Singh v. State of M.P. : 1985CriLJ1862 , the Apex Court held that it is not open to any Court to … hand over the accused to Police Chowki Kumhari on the instructions of maternal uncle of the accused namely Ayodhya Prasad (P.W. 1), before whom the accused/appellant had made an extra-judicial confession in village Kapsda just after the incident.
State of Maharashtra Vs. Shivaji Anandrao Chede
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-27-2002
Reported in: 2003BomCR(Cri)344; (2002)4BOMLR146; 2002CriLJ4198; 2002(4)MhLj201
has relied upon the following decisions.i. State of Maharashtra v. Dr. R.B. Choudhary, : 1968CriLJ95 . ii. Vijendrajit Ayodhya Prasad v. State of Bombay, 1953 Cri.L.J. 1097 iii. Makaradhwaja Bhoi and Anr. v. The State of Orissa 1984 … challenge against the order of acquittal, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor has relied on the following decisions.i. Bhagwan Singh v. State of Haryana, : 1976CriLJ203 . ii. State of U. P. v. Dr. R.P. Mittal 1992 (2) Crimes 664
Baljore Vs. State of U.P.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-15-2000
Reported in: 2000CriLJ4981
for doing so. If the order is 'clearly unreasonable' it is a compelling reason for interference (vide Jaswant Singh v. State of Haryana (2000) 4 JT (SC) 114 : AIR 2000 SC 1833). The principle was elucidated by Apex … Constable Yadu Nandan Singh (P.W. 6), Sub Inspector Sarbdeo Singh (P.W. 7), Constable Gopal Singh (P.W. 8), Suresh Prasad Singh (P.W. 9), Dr. B.P. Pandey (P.W. 10) and Dr. O.P. Khatri (P.W. 11) as formal witnesses. Head Constable … altercation took place between Km. Kamli and Tuphania. Balli (P.W. 3) and Ayodhya intervened the altercation between above two children and both went to their
Mukund Das and anr. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-11-1991
Reported in: 1993(0)MPLJ767b
out the details within the framework' of that policy. On some, what similar lines is the decision in Ayodhya Prasad v. State of U.P., AIR. 1968 SG 1344. This case also relates to formation of Panchayats in Uttar … of Tamil Nadu, AIR 1974 SC 555, Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, AIR 1978 SC 597, Baldev Singh v. State of H. P., AIR 1987 SC 1239, Swadeshi Cotton Mills v. Union of India, AIR 1981 SC 818,
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free