Averment - Judgment Search Results

Aver Dynam Herbals (Pvt) Ltd. Vs. Kerala Financial Corporation

Court: Kerala

MONDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST 2013 28TH SRAVANA, 1935 WP(C).No. 19746 of 2013 (P) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------- AVER DYNAM HERBALS (PVT) LTD. REGISTERED OFFICE AT PLOT NO.17 & 18 KINFRA SMALL INDUSTRIES PARK ST.XAVIER'S COLLEGE P.O.,

Cc Vs. Aver Digital Imaging Inc.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2007)(208)ELT123Tri(Mum.)bai

1. After hearing both sides and considering the issue of classification of the Sienna FP 5000, 220 V Digital Printer (Computerised) settled by the CC(Appeals) under heading 8471 is to be upheld for the reasons- a)...

M/S. Aver Photographic Co. Ramesh Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2001)(132)ELT321Tri(Mum.)bai

1. These applications are for modification of the order passed on stay petitions. Along with the appeals, appellants moved petitions claiming for stay of recovery of duty of Rs. 18.35 lakhs and penalty of Rs. 10...

Aver Photographic Company and Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

1. These cases were listed today for reporting compliance to the stay order by which pre-deposit was directed. The applicants have filed miscellaneous application seeking leave to withdraw the appeals for the reason that they have...

Fotolite Colour Labs, a Registered Partnership Concern, Rep. by One of ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1993(2)ALT343

ORDERMotilal B. Naik, J.1. Petitioner is the plaintiff in O.S.No. 496 of 1990 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Visakhapatnam. The case of the petitioner is that the above suit was instituted against the...

Ramakrishna Auto Colour Lab and Another Vs. Aver Photoprint System

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

machinery and earned from it. Opposite party denied any deficiency of service on their behalf and denied the averments of the complaint. 8. Complainant No. 2 filed affidavit evidence reiterating the averments of the complaint and submitted

“i Have Given Thoughtful Consideration to the Averments Vs. Financia ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

so purchased. Regarding possession, it was specifically observed as under :- “I have given thoughtful consideration to the averments supporting evidence as well as the contentions raised by both the counsel for parties. The nature of the