Aver - Judgment Search Results
Aver Dynam Herbals (Pvt) Ltd. Vs. Kerala Financial Corporation
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Aug-19-2013
MONDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST 2013 28TH SRAVANA, 1935 WP(C).No. 19746 of 2013 (P) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------- AVER DYNAM HERBALS (PVT) LTD. REGISTERED OFFICE AT PLOT NO.17 & 18 KINFRA SMALL INDUSTRIES PARK ST.XAVIER'S COLLEGE P.O.,
Cc Vs. Aver Digital Imaging Inc.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: May-31-2005
Reported in: (2007)(208)ELT123Tri(Mum.)bai
Matched in: Parties Cc Vs. Aver Digital Imaging Inc.
M/S. Aver Photographic Co. Ramesh Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: May-01-2001
Reported in: (2001)(132)ELT321Tri(Mum.)bai
Matched in: Parties M/S. Aver Photographic Co. Ramesh Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Aver Photographic Company and Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-21-2001
Matched in: Parties Aver Photographic Company and Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,
Fotolite Colour Labs, a Registered Partnership Concern, Rep. by One of ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-22-1993
Reported in: 1993(2)ALT343
Matched in: Parties Fotolite Colour Labs, a Registered Partnership Concern, Rep. by One of Its Partners, Sri D.N. Murthy Vs. Aver Foto Print System and ors.
Ramakrishna Auto Colour Lab and Another Vs. Aver Photoprint System
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Sep-03-2004
limitation. It is further submitted that the complainant has suppressed true and correct facts. Opposite party denies the averred payments made by the complainants and it is their contention that a sum of Rs. 2,37,050/- has been
“i Have Given Thoughtful Consideration to the Averments Vs. Financia ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-22-2013
so purchased. Regarding possession, it was specifically observed as under :- “I have given thoughtful consideration to the averments supporting evidence as well as the contentions raised by both the counsel for parties. The nature of the
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free