Available Jurisdiction - Judgment Search Results

Jurisdiction Vested in It in Declining to Interfere with the Order of ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

court has held as follows:- “In this appeal, the High Court has failed to exercise the Rs.No.1407 o”3. jurisdiction vested in it in declining to interfere with the order of FiRs.Additional District Judge, Ballia without disclosing any

invoking Supervisory Jurisdiction of This Court Under Article Vs. Rake ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

thereafter the document was misplaced and despite best efforts the same could not be traced and is not available. All these circumstances, necessitating leading of secondary evidence by the applicant - defendant No.1, have elaborately been put-forth … BHUSHAN PARSOON Present: Mr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners. **** Dr.Bharat Bhushan Parsoon, J.(Oral) 1. Invoking supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, this civil revision petition has been preferred

M K Ponnappa vs Jurisdiction Officer

Court: Karnataka

VIRAJPET -571 218. KODAGU DISTRICT …PETITIONER(BY SRI. KASHINATH KALMATH, ADVOCATE) Digitally AND: signed by CHAITHRA A Location: 1. JURISDICTION OFFICER HIGH COURT OF SGSTO 301 KARNATAKA VIRAJPET -571 218. KODAGU DISTRICT. …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. JYOTHI M. MARADI,

invoking the Supervisory Jurisdiction of This Court Under Vs. Smt. Pho ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

PARSOON Present: Mr. Ajay Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. **** Dr.Bharat Bhushan Parsoon, J.(Oral) 1. Invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has impugned orders dated 14.8.2013

State Trading Corporation of India (Agricultural Production Divn.) Wit ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1981)1MLJ452

Whether the plaintiff has committed breach of contract as contended by the defendant?3. Whether this Court has no jurisdiction to entertain the suit?4. To what relief?2. The trial Court took up for consideration issue No. 3 relating

In Re: Bombay Revenue Jurisdiction Act, 1876

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1921)ILR45Bom463

this reference, it has been argued by Mr. Bahadurji for the third party that this Court has no jurisdiction to hear the matter referred because Section 12 of the Bombay Revenue Jurisdiction Act only deals with claims … were originally founded on the Sanad were guaranteed by the treaty. Tatya Maharaja's consent was, therefore, of no avail. Surrender of the estate by him could not prejudice the rights of his descendants, though he could enter