Assume - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: assume Page 1 of about 11 results (0.019 seconds)‘X’ (Assumed Name) vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
assailants, but there is no presumption or any basis for assuming that the statement of such a witness is always correct
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT‘X’ (Assumed Name) vs.vikash Sharma & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :11. h JANUARY, 2017 DECIDED ON :10. h...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT‘X’ (Assumed Name) vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~25 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.REV.P.335/2016 & CRL.M.A.No.7308/2016 DECIDED ON :10. h MARCH,...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTX (Assumed Name of the Prosecutrix) Vs. the State (N.C.T. of Delhi) an ...
Court: Delhi
$-30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :22. d MARCH, 2013 + W.P.(CRL.) 449/2013...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTX (Assumed Name) vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : MAY05 2017 DECIDED ON : AUGUST16...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT‘X’ (Assumed Name) vs.state of Nct Delhi
Court: Delhi
$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :19. h APRIL, 2018 TR.P.(CRL.) 14/2018, CRL.M.A.Nos.45&...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Assumal Veerumal
Court: Rajasthan
Reported in: [1988]170ITR489(Raj)
as the firm stood dissolved on the death of Shri Assumal, partner, on August 11, 1975, and, therefore, two separate assessments
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. Assumal Veerumal.
Court: Rajasthan
Reported in: (1987)65CTR(Raj)301
30-4-1976 ?'2. The assessee-firm consisted initially of four partners, namely, Assumal, Virumal, Tillomal and Lachmandass having equal shares. On the death
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTirathdas Pokhardas Kalda Vs. Smt. Suribai Assumal Moolchandani and or ...
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: 2007(1)ALLMR202
avoid any controversy. During pendency of case before Rent Controller, Assumal also expired and shop block came in possession of his
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMohandas Vishindas Chainani Vs. Hiranand Assumal
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: (1974)76BOMLR494
examine that case law for the simple reason that even assuming that the question of licence as against the sub-tenancy was
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>