Associated Trade Marks - Judgment Search Results

Registrar of Trade Marks Thr Deputy Registrar of Trade Marks vs.sonik ...

Court: Delhi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI C.R.P. No.146/2015 & CM No.21927/2015 (for stay) REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjeev Narula, CGSC and Ms. Anumita Chandra, Adv. versus KAPOOR SAWS MANUFACTURING CO &

Registrar of Trade Marks vs.kapoor Saws Manufacturing Co & Ors

Court: Delhi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI C.R.P. No.146/2015 & CM No.21927/2015 (for stay) REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjeev Narula, CGSC and Ms. Anumita Chandra, Adv. versus KAPOOR SAWS MANUFACTURING CO &

Hugo Boss Trade Mark Management Gmbh & Co. Kg vs.ms. Sheeta Sabharwal ...

Court: Delhi

its goods/services as that of the Plaintiff; Allowing or permitting third parties to use, any other show any association of the Defendant’s product/services with the Plaintiff products manufactured and sold under the earlier trade marks BOSS, BOSS … is reproduced hereinbelow:-"CS (COMM) 1236/2018 Page 1 of 11 “A. B. Pass a decree of declaration that the trade marks BOSS, HUGO BOSS and BOSS formative/family of marks of the Plaintiff are well-known trade marks. The Defendant, their

Registrar of Trade Marks Vs. Hamdard National Foundation (India)

Court: Delhi

Reported in: AIR1980Delhi180; 17(1980)DLT521; 1980RLR514

against the order of the learned single judge by which heset aside the order of the Registrar of Trade Marks and allowed the application of the respondent to have their trade mark consisting of the word(SAFIi) registered in … they may have reference to the character and quality of goods yethave over a course of period, become associated with the goods of aparticular trader and in that sense they would certainly be capable of distinguishing the

Patent and Trade Mark Agencies Employees Union Vs. William Frederic De ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1964Cal80

the Institute of Trade Mark Agents, London and the petitioners are registered Trade Mark Agents under the Indian Trade Marks Act 1940 and Rules made thereunder. They claim to be fully conversant with the laws and practice relating … It is true that the patients are drawn to the hospitals primarily because of the doctors or surgeons associated with them. But there can be no doubt that the work of the hospital and its purpose are

Whirlpool Corporation Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks, Mumbai and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1999SC22; JT1998(7)SC243; 1998(5)SCALE655; (1998)8SCC1; [1998]Supp2SCR359; MANU/SC/0664/1998; AIR 1998 SC 22

the respective registrations are in respect of different goods, be deemed to be and shall be registered as associated trade mark.(4) On application made in the prescribed manner to a High Court or to the Registrar, by any … started the gyrating movement by applying for registration of their Trade Mark 'WHIRLPOOL' to the Registrar of the Trade Marks under the Trade Marks Act, 1940, which has since been replaced by the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act,

S.S. White Burs Inc. 1145, Towbin Avenue, Lakewood, New Jersey, Usa vs ...

Court: Delhi

(COMM.IPD-TM) 448/2022 S.S. WHITE BURS INC. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Balaji Subramanian and Mr. Akash Kundu, Advocates.versusTHE REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS, & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Balendu Shekhar, CGSC with Mr. Krishna Chaitanya, Mr. Rajkumar Maurya and Mr. Divyansh, … the United Kingdom, France andPRATAP SINGH C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 448/2022 & Anr. Page 5 of 52Brazil, together with the associated goodwill and trademark registrations. It is stated that this amendment also superseded prior licensing arrangements and reaffirmed the

Mankind Pharma Limited vs Registrar of Trade Marks

Court: Delhi

it with the distinctive suffix ‘KIND’, which acts as a source identifier of the products that are exclusively associated with the Appellant. 8.5 The Respondent ought to have included in its Examination Report various marks under KIND … DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment delivered on: 09.01.2026+ C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 13/2025 & I.A. 7045/2025MANKIND PHARMA LIMITED .....AppellantVersusTHE REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS .....RespondentAdvocates who appeared in this caseFor the Appellant : Mr. Hemant Daswani and Ms. Saumya Bajpai, Advocates.For the

Karan Rathore vs Registrar of Trade Marks & Anr.

Court: Delhi

DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment delivered on: 17.01.2026 + C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 23/2024 & I.A. 9027/2024 KARAN RATHORE .....AppellantversusREGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS & ANR. .....Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case For the Appellant : Mr. Kunal Khanna, Mr. Vishal

Coldsmiths Retail Services Private Limited vs Registrar of Trade Marks

Court: Delhi

on: 12.02.2026Judgment delivered on: 17.02.2026W.P.(C)-IPD 37/2025, CM 162/2025 & CM 164/2025 COLDSMITHS RETAIL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED .....PetitionerversusREGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS .....Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjeev Puri, Senior Advocate with Ms.