Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Assignment - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 14 2003

Alankit Assignments Ltd. Vs. Joint Cit

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-14-2003

Reported in: (2004)89TTJ(Del)1053

up by the following corporate shareholders :S. No.Name of the companyAmount of investment in share capital of Alankit Assignments Ltd. added on protective basis Rs.1. Real Overseas (P) Ltd. 3,00,0002. Parul Poly Products (P) Ltd. 5,00,0003. Garg


Feb 10 2012

Alankit Assignments Ltd Vs. Cdr S.P. Puri (Retd) and anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-10-2012

OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. 147/2010 Reserved on: January 20, 2012. Decision on: February 10, 2012. ALANKIT ASSIGNMENTS LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. J.P. Sengh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Kshitiz Khera, Ms. Mithu Jain, Mr. Sumeet


Aug 08 1919

The Official Assigns of the Calcutta High Court Vs. Bidyasundari Dasi ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Aug-08-1919

Reported in: 54Ind.Cas.700

guess. On the 5th July 1911 Raimohan was adjudged an insolvent and his assets vested in the Official Assignee of this Court. On the 21st November 1911 Bidyasundari executed a deed of gift in favour of Raimohan.


18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 31 1927

Assigned Car Cases

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-31-1927

January 25, 1907, pp. 49-81; April 28, 1908; June 9, 1914, 31 I.C.C.193, 217, 224; also In re Assignment of Freight Cars, 57 I.C.C. 760. [ Footnote 4 ] Between April 28, 1908, and the date of


Aug 07 2018

K. K. Chakraborty vs.alankit Assignments Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-07-2018

:7. h August, 2018 + LPA7292017 K. K. CHAKRABORTY Through : Ms. Deepali Gupta, Advocate. .....Appellant Versus ALANKIT ASSIGNMENTS LTD. ....Respondent Through : Mr. Siddharth Sharma, Advocate with Ms. Shruti Arora, Advocate. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G.


Aug 27 2008

Cmdr. S.P. Puri Vs. Alankit Assignments Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-27-2008

Reported in: 2008(3)ARBLR465(Delhi); 2008(105)DRJ635

impugned Award, the Arbitral Tribunal has rejected claims of the Objector and allowed counter claim of respondent-M/s. Alankit Assignments Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'respondent or AAL', for short) of Rs. 32,72,631/- less Rs. 15,00,000/- deposited by


Jul 13 2017

Shivam Sharma vs.m/s Alankit Assignments Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-13-2017

% SHIVAM SHARMA FAO No.75/2017 13th July, 2017 ..... Appellant Mr. Vivek Singh, Advocate. Through: versus M/S ALANKIT ASSIGNMENTS LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Pratiksha Chaturvedi, Advocate. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to


Sep 18 2017

K K Chakraborty vs.m/s. Alankit Assignments Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-18-2017

h September, 2017 W.P.(C) 7859/2017 K K CHAKRABORTY ........ Petitioner Through Ms. Deepali Gupta, Advocate versus M/S. ALANKIT ASSIGNMENTS LTD. ..... Respondent Through CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA Nemo. ANU MALHOTRA, J.JUDGMENT1 Vide the present petition,


Apr 09 2024

Tilak Rethesh N. vs the Tahsildar (Land Assignment)

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Apr-09-2024

AGED 46 YEARS 2 AVINASH N. AGED 42 YEARS BY ADV K.K.MOHAMED RAVUF RESPONDENTS: 1 THE TAHSILDAR (LAND ASSIGNMENT) MANJESWARAM TALUK, MANJESWARAM (PART OF FORMER KASARGOD TALUK), KASARGOD DISTRICT, PIN - 671121 2 THE TAHSILDAR KASARGOD TALUK,


Jun 28 2004

Darsi Ragamma, W/O. Late Rangaiah Upparapalem and D. Arun Kumar, S/O. ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jun-28-2004

Reported in: 2004(4)ALD488

Petitions are disposed of by this common order.2. One Rangaiah, husband of first petitioner, applied to Tahsildar for assignment of Government land. Petitioners alleged that the Tahsildar assigned the land admeasuring Ac.1.00 in S.No.1508/2 and Acs.1.08 in


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial