Assignment - Judgment Search Results
Alankit Assignments Ltd. Vs. Joint Cit
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-14-2003
Reported in: (2004)89TTJ(Del)1053
up by the following corporate shareholders :S. No.Name of the companyAmount of investment in share capital of Alankit Assignments Ltd. added on protective basis Rs.1. Real Overseas (P) Ltd. 3,00,0002. Parul Poly Products (P) Ltd. 5,00,0003. Garg
Alankit Assignments Ltd Vs. Cdr S.P. Puri (Retd) and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-10-2012
OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. 147/2010 Reserved on: January 20, 2012. Decision on: February 10, 2012. ALANKIT ASSIGNMENTS LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. J.P. Sengh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Kshitiz Khera, Ms. Mithu Jain, Mr. Sumeet
The Official Assigns of the Calcutta High Court Vs. Bidyasundari Dasi ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-08-1919
Reported in: 54Ind.Cas.700
guess. On the 5th July 1911 Raimohan was adjudged an insolvent and his assets vested in the Official Assignee of this Court. On the 21st November 1911 Bidyasundari executed a deed of gift in favour of Raimohan.
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Assigned Car Cases
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-31-1927
January 25, 1907, pp. 49-81; April 28, 1908; June 9, 1914, 31 I.C.C.193, 217, 224; also In re Assignment of Freight Cars, 57 I.C.C. 760. [ Footnote 4 ] Between April 28, 1908, and the date of
K. K. Chakraborty vs.alankit Assignments Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2018
:7. h August, 2018 + LPA7292017 K. K. CHAKRABORTY Through : Ms. Deepali Gupta, Advocate. .....Appellant Versus ALANKIT ASSIGNMENTS LTD. ....Respondent Through : Mr. Siddharth Sharma, Advocate with Ms. Shruti Arora, Advocate. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G.
Cmdr. S.P. Puri Vs. Alankit Assignments Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2008
Reported in: 2008(3)ARBLR465(Delhi); 2008(105)DRJ635
impugned Award, the Arbitral Tribunal has rejected claims of the Objector and allowed counter claim of respondent-M/s. Alankit Assignments Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'respondent or AAL', for short) of Rs. 32,72,631/- less Rs. 15,00,000/- deposited by
Shivam Sharma vs.m/s Alankit Assignments Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-13-2017
% SHIVAM SHARMA FAO No.75/2017 13th July, 2017 ..... Appellant Mr. Vivek Singh, Advocate. Through: versus M/S ALANKIT ASSIGNMENTS LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Pratiksha Chaturvedi, Advocate. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to
K K Chakraborty vs.m/s. Alankit Assignments Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-18-2017
h September, 2017 W.P.(C) 7859/2017 K K CHAKRABORTY ........ Petitioner Through Ms. Deepali Gupta, Advocate versus M/S. ALANKIT ASSIGNMENTS LTD. ..... Respondent Through CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA Nemo. ANU MALHOTRA, J.JUDGMENT1 Vide the present petition,
Tilak Rethesh N. vs the Tahsildar (Land Assignment)
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Apr-09-2024
AGED 46 YEARS 2 AVINASH N. AGED 42 YEARS BY ADV K.K.MOHAMED RAVUF RESPONDENTS: 1 THE TAHSILDAR (LAND ASSIGNMENT) MANJESWARAM TALUK, MANJESWARAM (PART OF FORMER KASARGOD TALUK), KASARGOD DISTRICT, PIN - 671121 2 THE TAHSILDAR KASARGOD TALUK,
Darsi Ragamma, W/O. Late Rangaiah Upparapalem and D. Arun Kumar, S/O. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-28-2004
Reported in: 2004(4)ALD488
Petitions are disposed of by this common order.2. One Rangaiah, husband of first petitioner, applied to Tahsildar for assignment of Government land. Petitioners alleged that the Tahsildar assigned the land admeasuring Ac.1.00 in S.No.1508/2 and Acs.1.08 in
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free