Court : Delhi
$~22. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11566/2016 and CM APPL.45584-88/2016 1. RAMJEE SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Advocate with Dr. Rakesh Gosain, Mr. Indranil Ghosh, Mr. Sumeet Kumar Singh and Mr. Kunal Singh, Advocates versus THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF AYUSH, GOVT. OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar, CGSC for R-1 and R-2 with Mr. A.K. Panigrahi, Advocate and Mr. Franklin L. Khobung, Director. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % The present petition has been filed by the petitioner praying inter alia ORDER0812.2016 for setting aside the notice dated 30.11.2016, issued by the respondent No.1/Ministry of Ayurveda, Yoga, Naturopathy and Unani, Sidha and Homeopathy (AYUSH), Government of India, proposing to hold the election to the post of President of the Central Council of Homoeopathy W.P.(C)11566/2016 Page 1 of 12 (hereinafter referred to as the Council) on 09.12.2016, and fu...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : 2001IIAD(Delhi)582; 90(2001)DLT262; 2001(57)DRJ600
ORDERA.K. SIKRI, J.1. The credentials of the petitioner in this petition demonstrate as to how the petitioner who is a handicapped person, as she was born with congenital blindness, has not allowed this disability to disable her. Even without any vision or proper vision since birth, the petitioner not only pursued her studies but proved to the world at large that what a normal student could do she could do the same equally well or even better. This is clearly demonstrated by the testimony of her academic record. She passed her Senior Secondary Examination with distinction in Accountancy as well as Economics in 1981. She joined B.A. (Hons.) degree course in Instrumental Music and topped in Daulat Ram College, University of Delhi in all three years; in 1984, received third prize in Culturefest, for Sitar Vadan during the Diamond Jubilee Celebration of Delhi University; in 1985 she was awarded of All India Post Graduate Scholarship for Instrumental Music by the University of Delhi. After ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : 2001IIAD(Delhi)749; 90(2001)DLT36; 2001(57)DRJ734
ORDERA.K. Sikri, J.1. This petition discloses that notwithstanding clear, unambiguous and laudable objectives sought to be achieved by a decision, how it remains only on paper because of apathy, lack of will and lackadaisical approach of the authorities who are supposed to implement such decision. The laudable decision here is that of Executive Council of the University of Delhi taken vide its Resolution No.193/(SIC) on 16th July, 1994 with a vision to help the visually and Orthopedically handicapped persons to get teaching posts in the University and Colleges. It provided, vide aforesaid Resolution, 3 per cent reservations with immediate effect for blind and Orthopedically candidates in teaching post in the Delhi University and the Colleges affiliated to the University. It also provided that at least one disabled person must be appointed in each college during the academic year 1994-95. The Executive Council's vision is clear from the fact that what it did by aforesaid Resolution ulti...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: September 06, 2017 LPA5832017 & C.M. 32386/2017 RAVI SINGHAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Yashish Chandra & Mr. Shantanu, Advocates Versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Anita Sahni, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr. T.S. Singhdev & Ms. Puja Sarkar, Advocates for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. The appellants grievance is with respect to the order of the learned Single Judge rejecting his writ petition seeking a direction to the respondents to permit him to migrate from Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed Medical College, Barpeta, Assam to North DMC Medical College, Bara Hindu Rao Hospital, Delhi.2. Appellant was admitted to the Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed Medical College, Barpeta, Assam on the basis of ranking in the pre-medical test conducted in the academic year 2015-16. After completion of his first...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : (2004)91TTJ(Del)1097
ORDERR.M. Mehta, Vice PresidentAll these appeals have been filed by the revenue and having been heard together, are disposed of by means of a consolidated order. At the time of hearing, both the parties agreed and stated that the Tribunal be pleased to take up initially three appeals, which arose out of a consolidated order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) for assessment years 1990-91, 1992-93 and 1994-96, and these were ITA Nos. 1828, 1829 and 1830/Del/2002. The common ground raised by the revenue in all these three appeals runs as under :'On the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned Commissioner (Appeals)-XXVI, New Delhi, erred in deleting the addition by holding the recurring compensation as agricultural income exempt from tax, although the same is nothing but additional compensation chargeable under section 45(5) of the Income Tax Act.'2. Coming to the facts of the case, these are identical for assessment years 1990-91 and 1992-93 inasmuch as proceedings were origina...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :24. 07.2013 Judgment pronounced on :29. 07.2013 W.P.(C) 3952/2013 SMIT RAJPUT & ANR Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Manoj Goel, Mr. Shuvodeeep Roy and Mr. Gopal Verma, Advs. versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Mukul Talwar with Mr.Sradhananda Mohapatra, Advocate for GGSIPU. Mr.S.D.Salwan, Advocate for the respondent nos. 7 to 16 Mr.Mohinder J.S.Rupal, Advocate for respondent/University of Delhi Mr. Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr.Roshan Lal Goel, Advocate for respondent No.4/UOI Dr.Rakesh Gosain, Advocate for respondent No.6. Ms. Sana Ansari for Ms. Zubeda Begum, Advocate for resp. No. 2 Mr. Ashish Kumar, Adv. for MCI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.1. Prior to the current academic year, the admissions to various Post Graduate courses were being made by, drawing students from two different sources, on the basis of two different entrance examinations, one bei...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:16. 09.2013 PRONOUNCED ON:23. 09.2013 % LPA 358/2013 & CM No.8408/2013 SHIVAJI COLLEGE & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. V.P. Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Anurag Mathur, Advocate. Versus RAJIV KUMAR & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Jyoti Singh, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Tinu Bajwa and Mr. S.S. Nehra, Advocates for R-1. Ms. Maninder Acharya, Sr. Advocate with Mr. M. Singh and Mr. Sunil Singh, Advocates. LPA 450/2013, CM APPL.9830, 9831/2013 UNIVERSITY OF DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. V.P. Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Anurag Mathur, Advocate. versus DR RAJIV KUMAR & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Jyoti Singh, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Tinu Bajwa and Mr. S.s. Nehra, Advocates for R-1. Ms. Maninder Acharya, Sr. Advocate with Mr. M. Singh and Mr. Sunil Singh, Advocates. LPA 35.& 450/2013 Page 1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT 1 The Shivaji College (hereaft...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:12. h November, 2013 + W.P.(C) 10881/2009 ALL INDIA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Ajay Vohra, Ms. Kavita Jha and Mr. Vaibhav Kulkarni, Advocates. versus DG OF INCOME TAX (E) & ORS. ..... Respondent Through Mr. Rohit Madan, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate. + W.P.(C) 1735/2012 ALL INDIA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION & ANR .... Petitioner Through Mr. Ajay Vohra, Ms. Kavita Jha and Mr. Vaibhav Kulkarni, Advocates. versus DIRECTOR GENERAL OF INCOME TAX(E) & ORS ..... Respondent Through Mr. Rohit Madan, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) This common judgment will dispose of the aforesaid two connected writ petitions filed by All India Management Association impugning order dated 29th July, 2009 relating to assessment years 2005-06 to 2007-08 and order dated 28th February, 20...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : AIR1985Delhi122; 1987(1)ARBLR296(Delhi); ILR1985Delhi169
Avadh Behari Rohatgi, J.(1) In this arbitration case the question referred to the Full Bench is one of jurisdiction. Two questions arise on the reference. One whether the Union of India 'carries on business' within the meaning of section 20 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Second whether the Delhi Courts have Jurisdiction to entertain an application under sections 14 and 17 of the Arbitration Act against the Union of India not on the ground that the cause of action arose here but solely on the ground that the Union of India has its central seat of power at New Delhi. (2) These are the facts. Gupta Sanitary Stores, petitioner, entered into a contract with the respondent Union of India, for 'improvement of water supply at Joshimath' in 1969-70. There was an arbitration clause in the contract. Disputes arose between the parties. They were referred to the sole arbitration of K. S. Sil, Commander Works Engineer, Bareilly Cantt. He made the award on 31-10-1979. Of the making of the award he g...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$ ~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: December 16th, 2017 Judgment pronounced on: February 19th, 2018 + CRL.A. No.254/2014 VIVEKANAND BIHARI .... Appellant STATE Through: Mr. Deepak Anand and Mr. Aayushmaan Vatsayana, Advs. Versus Through: Ms. Aasha Tiwari, APP for ......Respondent State. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S. P. GARG HONBLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR % C. HARI SHANKAR, J.1. (JUDGMENT) The appellant Vivekanand Bihari seeks, by means of the present appeal, to challenge the judgment, dated 25th September 2013, and the consequent order, dated 26th September 2013, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Dwarka (hereinafter referred to as the learned ASJ), whereby the appellant has been found guilty of having committed the murder of Prabhash, and of having thrown his dead body in the ganda nala (drain), thereby committing offences Crl Appeal 254/2014 Page 1 of 90 punishable under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter...
Tag this Judgment!