Court : Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7711/2016 Judgment reserved on: July 20, 2017 Judgment delivered on: August 08, 2017 DR. KANWALJEET SINGH Through: Mr. Kunal Vinayak, Adv. ........ Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr. D.P. ........ RESPONDENTS Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. Satya Prakash Singh and Ms. Adrija Thakur, Advs. for R1 and R2. Mr. Kanwal Chaudhary and Mr. Rishu Kant Sharma, Advs. for R3 and R5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:-"Therefore, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case it is most humbly and respectfully prayed that this Honble Court may graciously be pleased to: A. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to quash and set aside the illegal, unjust, unfair and arbitrary approval order dated 22.09.2015 of the ACC (Annexure P-9) and the appointment order da...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: October 12, 2017 + W.P.(C) 7826/2016, CM No.32348/2016 UMAR KHALID Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Mr. Jawahar ........ Petitioner(s) Raja, Mr. Sourav Roy, Ms. Jahnavi Mitra and Mr. Chinmay Kanojia, Advs. versus JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY THR ITS REGISTRAR ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Ginny J.Rautray, Ms. Kanchan Kaur Dhodhi and Ms. Anushka Ashok, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 The present petition has been filed with the following prayers:-"In the facts and circumstances set out above, it is most respectfully prayed that this Honble Court be pleased to: a) issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction calling for the records, quash and set aside respondents W.P.(C) No.7826/2016 Page 1 of 58 2. i) ii) Office Order No.198/CP/2016 dated 22.8.2016; Appellate Committee proceedings dated Nil, based on which Office Order No.198/CP/2016 dated 22.8.2016 came t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:14. h December, 2018 Pronounced on:18. h December, 2018 + W.P.(C) 12929/2018 MS. SAUMYA CHOPRA Through: ........ Petitioner Ms. Vandana Sehgal, Adv. with Mr. Iqram Govind Singh, Advs. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. with Ms. Slomita Rai, Adv. for University of Delhi + W.P.(C) 9718/2018 & CM APPLs. 37885-37886/2018, 40576/2018 SURBHI GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Tikku, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Subhash Garg, Adv. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. with Ms. Slomita Rai, Adv. for University of Delhi ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Naveen Kr. Singh, Adv. + W.P.(C) 10266/2018 ANSHUMAN JEESU W.P.(C) 12929/2018 & connected matters versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Page 1 of 20 Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. with Ms. Slomita Rai, Adv. for University of Delhi RAHUL KUMAR GUPTA +...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. 09.2019 + W.P.(C) 4543/2016 and CM APPL. 35206/2019 RAJEEV KUMAR BHARDWAJ Through: Mr. Saurabh Tiwari, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Harsh Kaushik, Mr. Varun Tandon, Advs. for R-1 Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel (Services) with Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Ms. Laveena Arora, Advs. for R-2 Ms. Meenal Duggal, Adv. for Mr. Viraj R Datar, Adv. for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition,... Petitioner prays for the following reliefs: b) A writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 03.02.2012 passed by the Ld. District & Sessions Judge, Delhi/ Respondent No.2, being illegal, arbitrary; without jurisdiction and unjust and in violation of the consolidated in O.M. dated 26.12.2013; instructions contained W.P.(C) 4543/2016 Page 1 of 15 c) A writ in the nature of certiorari, ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:11. h December, 2019 + ARTI DEVI W.P.(C) 9407/2019 Through: Mr. Dibyanshu Pandey, Ms. Simran Bhagat & Mr. Veeraragavan N., Advocates (M-9953810683) ........ Petitioner versus JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Monica Arora, Standing Counsel, JNU with Mr. Harsh Ahuja, Ms. Anushkha Ashok along with Dr. Pramod Kumar, Registrar (M- 9810246300) Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel GNCTD with Mr. Chaitanya Gosain, Advocates (M-9999981270) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J(oral) The... Petitioner had filed a complaint on 9th January, 2018 before the 1. Internal Complaints Committee (hereinafter ICC) of the JNU, constituted under the University Grants Commission (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal of Sexual Harassment of Women Employees and Students in Higher Educational Institution) Regulations, 2015. The ICC submitted its recommendations on 2nd August, 2018. One of the recommendations o...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : 158(2009)DLT176
Vipin Sanghi, J.1. By this common judgment I propose to dispose off the aforesaid two writ petitions.2. The petitioners state that petitioner No. 1, Bharti Vidyapeeth, is a registered trust and is involved in promoting education throughout the country. It is stated that petitioner No. 2 Bhartiya Vidyapeeth is a deemed University under Section 3 of the University Grants Commission (UGC) Act, 1956. It is situated at Pune, having various constituent institutions in the country. Petitioner No. 3, Bhartiya Vidyapeeth College of Engineering, is an engineering college set up by the petitioner No. 1 trust having its campus in New Delhi. Petitioner No. 3 institute imparts courses leading to the grant of B. Tech. degree in engineering. Petitioner No. 4, Bhartiya Vidyapeeth Institute of Computer Applications and Management, New Delhi is an institute imparting education in the field of computer education and management. It has been set up by petitioner No. 1 and has its campus at the same location...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : 47(1992)DLT472
D.P. Wadhwa, J.(1) By this petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution the petitioners numbering four seek a writ or direction for setting aside the elections of the Executive Committee including that of the President and Vice-President of the Medical Council of India which elections were held on 4/03/1991. Another direction sought is that Medical Council of India, the first respondent to update its electoral roll in accordance with the provisions of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 (for short 'the Act') and then for holding of elections as per law. Yet another direction sought is that respondents 4,5,15 and 16 were not entitled to participate in the activities of the first respondent as they had ceased to be members of the Council of the first respondent by operation of law. Two more directions are also sought :(1) for setting aside the minutes dated 4/03/1991 of the General Body Meeting of the Medical Council of the first respondent and (2) for setting aside the...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: October 12, 2017 + W.P.(C) 7828/2016, CM No.32352/2016 ANIRBAN BHATTACHARYA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Trideep Pais and Ms. Vrinda Bhandari, Advs. versus JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY THR ITS REGISTRAR JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Ginny J.Rautray, Ms. Kanchan Kaur Dhodhi and Ms. Anushka Ashok, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 The present petition has been filed with the following prayers:-"In the facts and circumstances set out above, it is most respectfully prayed that this Honble Court be pleased to: a) issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction calling for the records, quash and set aside respondents i) ii) Office Order No.197/CP/2016 dated 22.8.2016; Appellate Committee proceedings dated Nil, based W.P.(C) No.7828/2016 Page 1 of 53 2. on which Office Order No.197/CP/2016 dated 22.8.2016 came to be passed; iii) ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA6512017 MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA ..... Appellant Decided on:13. 11.2017 Through : Sh. Vikas Singh, Sr. Advocate with Sh. T. Singhdev, Ms. Puja Sarkar, Ms. Mischalle Biakthan Singh and Sh. Tarun Verma, Advocates. LPA6542017 GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY ..... Appellant Through : Ms. Ekta Sikri and Sh. Jasbir Bidhuri, Advocates. Versus DIGANT JAIN AND ORS. Respondents Through : Sh. Bharat Sanghal, Ms. Vernika Tomar, Ms. Vidushi Garg, Ms. Isha Gupta and Ms. Anudita Deka, Advocates, for Respondent No.1. Sh. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC and Sh. Waize Ali Noor and Sh. Prateek Dhanda, Advocates, for Respondent Nos. 4 to 7. Sh. Siddhartha Dutta, Advocate, for Respondent No.8. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. These appeals are by the Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University (hereafter the University) and the Medical Council of India (hereafter MCI). They are aggrieve...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : 1998VIAD(Delhi)386; AIR1999Delhi232; 1998(47)DRJ410; ILR1998Delhi883
ORDERAnil Dev Singh, J.1. This is a writ petition whereby the petitioner challenges the order of his expulsion dated June 2, 1998 from the American Embassy School. The facts lie in a narrow compass. 2. In the year 1993 the petitioner joined the third respondent American Embassy School (formerly known as American International School), in the VII Standard. The petitioner was eventually promoted to the High School of the same institution. By means of a letter dated August 8, 1997 the fourth respondent the Principal of the School Mr. Kevin Schafer, informed the parents of the petitioner that he was being placed on final probation for remainder of his enrolment at the school in view of the seriousness of the disciplinary issues. It was also pointed out that in case any further disciplinary issues arise with the petitioner the school will immediately proceed with his expulsion. It was further stated that the letter serves as a final warning to the petitioner. On May 22, 1998 the petitioner ...
Tag this Judgment!