Court : Delhi
$~69 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 9044/2019, CM Nos.37318/2019 & 41050/2019 Date of decision:24. September 2019 SHUBHANGI SINHA ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Abhijat, Mr. Abhishek R. Shukla and Mr. Shashwat Jindal, Advs. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Mr. Hardik Rupal, Mr. Prang Newmai, Ms. Aditi Shastri and Mr. Kaushik Ghosh, Advs. for University of Delhi. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL):1. Via this writ petition, a direction is sought against the respondents to admit the petitioner in the Post-Graduate M.A. (History) course for the academic session 2019-20.2. The facts which are required to be noticed to adjudicate upon this writ petition are briefly set forth hereafter.3. The petitioner acquired a degree in B.A. Hons. (History) from the University of Delhi in 2018. In this course, the petitioner obtained a cumulative CGPA of 6.892 which, if converted into percentag...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. h July, 2015 % + W.P.(C) 5943/2015 INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL EXCELLENCE ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Sharawat and Mr. Ratish Kumar, Advs. Versus ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION ......Respondent Through: Mr. Anil Soni and Mr. Naginder Benipal, Advs. for AICTE. AND + W.P.(C) 6138/2015 ACN COLLEGE OF PHARMACY ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Mayank Manish, Mr. Chandrashekhar Singh and Mr. Ravi Kant, Advs. Versus ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Anil Soni and Mr. Naginder Benipal, Advs. for AICTE.. CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The petitioner institutions in both the petitions applied to the respondent All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE), within the prescribed time, for approval for imparting education in the course of Diploma in Pharmacy, with effect from the academic year 2015-16 but the application of both the petitioners was rejected by the S...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. h July, 2015 % + W.P.(C) 5943/2015 INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL EXCELLENCE ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Sharawat and Mr. Ratish Kumar, Advs. Versus ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION ......Respondent Through: Mr. Anil Soni and Mr. Naginder Benipal, Advs. for AICTE. AND + W.P.(C) 6138/2015 ACN COLLEGE OF PHARMACY ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Mayank Manish, Mr. Chandrashekhar Singh and Mr. Ravi Kant, Advs. Versus ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Anil Soni and Mr. Naginder Benipal, Advs. for AICTE.. CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The petitioner institutions in both the petitions applied to the respondent All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE), within the prescribed time, for approval for imparting education in the course of Diploma in Pharmacy, with effect from the academic year 2015-16 but the application of both the petitioners was rejected by the S...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : 42(1990)DLT254; 1990(19)DRJ167
S.N. Sapra, J.(1) Rule D.B. (2) By the present writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner seeks to challenge the refusal/inaction, on the part of respondent No. 1. to give him admission, in the first years course of M.B , 1989, in Maulana Azad Medical College, Delhi. (3) In May, 1989, petitioner appeared in the entrance examination, conducted by respondent no 1, for admission to the M.B.,B.S. and Bds courses. Petitioner secured 772 marks out of the maximum of 1200 marks, and was placed at 239 position, in the merit list, along with 8 others at the same rank, who had secured the same marks. Finally petitioner's rank was declared at 247. In the first instance, respondent no. 1 allotted M.B,B.S. seats to the first 223 students in its various colleges, according to the preference of each of the candidates. Petitioner was, however, allotted Bds course, which he relinquished. Subsequently, respondent no. 1 allotted seats in the M.B , course to selected can...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : ILR1982Delhi1009
S. Ranganathan, J. (1) The first petitioner in this writ petition in the Rao Tula Ram College Society. It was registered on 2nd March, 1965 under the Societies' Registration Act (Act 30 of 1860) as amended in 1957 and extended to the Union Territory of Delhi. The second petitioner. Rao Birender Singh, is the President of the above Society who was authorised by a resolution passed by the Society at an emergent meeting held on 10th March, 1979 to take steps for challenging certain action taken by the respondents which according to the petitioners was arbitrary and illegal. The first respondent is the University of Delhi through the Vice-Chancellor of Delhi University. The second respondent (hereinafter referred to as the 'R-2') is Sri K. B. Rohatgi, Director of South Delhi Campus of Delhi University. (2) By the above writ petition the petitioners pray for the issue of a writ of certiorari to quash a resolution of the Executive Council (EC) of the first respondent dated 6th March, 1979 an...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : 119(2005)DLT225
Gita Mittal, J.1. These writ petitions raise questions relating to the manner of exercise of the discretion conferred on the respondents to permit migrations of students from one course and institutions under the Delhi University to another. The impugned order passed in all the petitions is the same and questions raised being identical, these petitions have been taken up together for hearing and disposal.However, it is necessary to note facts of each case in order to appreciate the contentions of the petitioners and the same are so noted.2. Facts in Writ Petition(C) No. 20013/04 entitled Radhika Garg v. Delhi University (i) The petitioner in this case has claimed that she had a brilliant academic record and scored over 74% in the school leaving examination conducted by the Central Board of Secondary Education. Based on her grading, she was admitted to the B.Sc. General (Industrial Chemistry) course and was allotted the Atma Ram Sanatan Dharam College by the Delhi University(arrayed as ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : 90(2001)DLT735; 2001(59)DRJ252
S.K. Mahajan, J.1. With the consent of the parties, arguments have been heard in the matter and the petition is being disposed of finally.2. By way of the present writ petition the petitioner is seeking to challenge the order dated October 13, 1998 whereby the respondent-University had decided not to allow the petitioner admission in any class/course in the Jamia Millia Islamia in future. The petitioner at the relevant time was a student of the class 12th and by the same order he was permitted to attend classes and could appear in the examination of Class 12. Pursuant to the permission granted for class 12 examination of the University, the petitioner was able to clear the said examination. After passing the examination, he applied for admission in B.Tech Course of the respondent University. Admission to this Course in the University is on the basis of merit in the written test and interview. Petitioner appeared in the entrance examination and his name was shown in the merit list. He, ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.6188/1999 25th October, 2013 % YATINDER MOHAN DUA AND ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Shekhar Kumar, Advocate. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY, DELHI AND ANR. Respondents Through: Mr. Shushank Shekhar, Advocate for UGC. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. Petitioners by this writ petition seek the relief of being granted the pay scale of Rs.1400-2300/- from the original date of their appointments. Petitioners on their original appointments were granted a pay scale of Rs.1200-1560-2040/-. Petitioners seek the benefit of the higher pay scale by seeking to place reliance upon the letter of the UGC of September, 1990 besides also by claiming that Prof. Abhai Mansingh Committee which made its recommendation on 16.10.1996 wrongly placed petitioners in para 4B of the report instead of para 6C. Petitioners additionally claim that their posts were equivalent to data entr...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
CM No.15761/2016 in WP(C) 3684/2016 1. The Petitioners in this Writ Petition seek the following reliefs:- (i) quash/set aside the impugned letters dated 19.04.2016, issued to Petitioner No.1 and 3, by All India Council for Technical Education, categorizing the petitioner no.1 and 3 in NO ADMISSION category and; (ii) further direct for entitling the Petitioner No.1 and 3 to be included in the process of admission for the academic session 2016-17, by granting extension of approval. 2. The petitioner No.1 is Guru Teg Bahadur Institute of Technology (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner Institute ) and the petitioner No.3 is Guru Teg Bahadur Polytechnic Institute (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner Polytechnic ). The petitioner No.1/Petitioner Institute operates from G-8 Area, Rajouri Garden, Opposite Swarg Ashram Mandir, Delhi. The petitioner No.3/Polytechnic operates from Vasant Vihar, New Delhi. Both the petitioners 1 and 3 are governed by the petitioner No.2 i.e. Delhi Sikh Gurdwa...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA No.989/2013 & CM Nos.20764/2013, 10976/2014 % DELHI UNIVERSITY CONTRACT EMPLOYEES UNION AND ORS. Date of decision :22. d November, 2016 ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Mr. Rajiv Agarwal, Ms. Nilam Tiwari, Mr. Vikram and Mr. Sachin Kumar, Advs. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajesh Gogna, CGSC for R-1 Mr. Santosh Kr. Tripathi, ASC for R-1 & 3 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S. TEJI JUDGMENT GITA MITTAL, J1 The appellants before us assail the judgment dated 16th December, 2013 passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing W.P.(C) No.7929/2013 rejecting the appellants prayer for the relief of quashing of the general selection process for appointment to the post of Junior Assistants to the respondent no.1 pursuant to LPA9892013 Page 1 of 49 their advertisement Advt. No.Estab.IV/246/2013 dated 6th November, 2013.2. The Delhi University Contract Employees Union ha...
Tag this Judgment!