Court : Delhi
Reported in : ILR1968Delhi364
M.M. Ismail, J.(1) These three appeals under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent are against the common judgment dated 26/5/1967 of Tatachari, J. allowing three writ petitions filed by the first respondent in each of these three Letters Patent Appeals. This judgment will dispose of all the three appeals. Shri Chittaranjan Das Sharma, the first respondent in L.P. Appeal No. 70 of 1967 and the petitioner in Civil Writ petition No. 231 of 1967 passed the Secondary School Certificate Examination in March 1963 conducted by the Gujarat Secondary School Certificate Examination Board, Baroda. In July, 1965, he applied for admission in Deshbandhu College, New Delhi, for studying in B.A. (Pass Course) of the University of Delhi. In his application dated 7/7/1965 in the prescribed form, he furnished all the required particulars including the examination passed by him. The Principal of the College accepted his application and admitted him provisionally to the B.A. First year class on his payment of fe...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : AIR1968Delhi131; 4(1968)DLT4
1. These three appeals under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent are against the common judgment dated 26-5-1967 of Tatachari, J. allowing three writ petitions filed by the first respondent in each of these three Letters Patent Appeals. This judgment will dispose of all the three appeals. Shri Chittaranjan Das Sharma, the first respondent in L. P. Appeal No. 70 of 1967 and petitioner in Civil Writ Petition No. 231 of 1967 passed the Secondary school Certificate Examination Board Baroda. In July, 1965, he applied for admission in Deshbandhu college, New Delhi, for studying B. A. (Pass Course) of the University of Delhi. In his application dated 7-7-1965 in the prescribed form, he furnished all the required particulars including the examination passed by him. The Principal of the College accepted his application and admitted him provisionally to the B. a. First Year class on his payment of fees subject to the approval of the University. On 6-9-1965, antoher application, in the prescribed for...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. h September, 2019 Pronounced on:1. t October, 2019 + W.P. (C) 7666/2019 and CM No.31863/2019 LAXMI COLLEGE OF EDUCATION .Petitioner Versus NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ANR. .Respondents W.P. (C) 6417/2019 and CM No.27264/2019 W.P. (C) 6438/2019 and CM No.27341/2019 W.P. (C) 7050/2019 and CM No.29407/2019 W.P. (C) 7354/2019 and CM No.30646/2019 W.P. (C) 7572/2019 W.P. (C) 7664/2019 and CM No.31861/2019 W.P. (C) 7665/2019 and CM No.31862/2019 W.P. (C) 7856/2019 and CM No.32668/2019 W.P. (C) 7858/2019 and CM No.32671/2019 W.P. (C) 7867/2019 and CM No.32684/2019 W.P. (C) 7869/2019 and CM No.32689/2019 W.P. (C) 7870/2019 and CM No.32694/2019 W.P. (C) 7871/2019 and CM No.32695/2019 W.P. (C) 7872/2019 and CM No.32696/2019 W.P. (C) 7873/2019 and CM No.32697/2019 W.P. (C) 7875/2019 and CM No.32704/2019 W.P. (C) 7908/2019 and CM No.32769/2019 W.P. (C) 8244/2019 W.P. (C) 8863/2019 W.P. (C) 9676/2019 + + + + + + + + + + + +...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :10. 07.2017 Judgment delivered on :14. 07.2017 + W.P.(C) 10055/2016 RAVI SINGHAL Through Mr. Yashish Chandra, Adv. Versus ........ Petitioner GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRSTHA UNIVERSITY AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms.Anita Sahni, Adv for R-1. Mr. T. Singhdev, Ms. Puja Sarkar and Ms. Michelle Biakthan Sangi Das, Adv for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 By way of this petition, the petitioner is seeking a quashing of the Office Order dated 04.10.2016 as also for quashing the amendment in Ordinance 7 of the Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University (GGSIPU- respondent No.1) in so far as it bars migration in the medical colleges of the W.P. (C) No.10055/2016 Page 1 of 27 said respondent No.1. The petitioner is also seeking a positive prayer of migration from his second year (3rd Semester) MBBS course (which he is pursuing at Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed Medical College, Barpeta, Assam) to t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : ILR1972Delhi176
Hardayal Hardy, C.J.(1) The following question of law has been referred to a Full Bench. 'WHETHERin view of Rule 5 of the Investigation of Industrial Undertakings (Procedure) Rules 1967 providing for an opportunity of hearing before the investigator and the absence of any specific provision either in the Act or in the Rules for supplying a copy of the investigator's report to the managernent, the taking over of the industrial undertaking without supplying a copy of the investigator's report is vitiated ?'(2) The question relates to a textile mill owned by Keshav Mills Company Limited, Petlad. The company was incorporated in the year 1935 and has over the years been yielding rich dividends and has been paying large sums of money by way of capital refund and bonus payment.(3) The petitioners claim that the years 1966, 1967 and 1968 were years of grave crisis for the Textile Industry in India as a whole and out of 500 and odd textile mills nearly 80 of them closed down during those years....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:14. h January, 2019 Pronounced on:1. t May, 2019 + W.P. (C) 11940/2018 NIKHIL AGRAWAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Anjuman Tripathy, Adv. versus THE UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ORS......... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal and Ms. Slomita Rai, Advs. for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT Registration, for admissions to Post Graduate (PG) % 1. programmes, being conducted by the University of Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the University) for the 2018-2019 academic session, was announced, by it, vide Press Release dated 10th May, 2018. The registration process was to commence on 18th May, 2018. In the M.A. (Political Science) Programme, with which the present writ petition is concerned, a total intake of 502 students was declared, out of which 251 seats were to be filled on the basis of an entrance test and 251 seats as per merit in the Undergraduate Programmes. Of the 251 seats to be filled on ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h November, 2014 % + LPA No.956/2013 AMIT KUMAR + + + + ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.189/2014 RAID HODA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.210/2014 ARCHANA KRISHNAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.211/2014 SHAGUFTA HUSSAIN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.213/2014 AMIT DIXIT ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. + AND LPA No.214/2014 RISHI KANWAR Through: + +...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h November, 2014 % + LPA No.956/2013 AMIT KUMAR + + + + ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.189/2014 RAID HODA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.210/2014 ARCHANA KRISHNAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.211/2014 SHAGUFTA HUSSAIN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.213/2014 AMIT DIXIT ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. + AND LPA No.214/2014 RISHI KANWAR Through: + +...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h November, 2014 % + LPA No.956/2013 AMIT KUMAR + + + + ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.189/2014 RAID HODA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.210/2014 ARCHANA KRISHNAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.211/2014 SHAGUFTA HUSSAIN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.213/2014 AMIT DIXIT ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. + AND LPA No.214/2014 RISHI KANWAR Through: + +...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h November, 2014 % + LPA No.956/2013 AMIT KUMAR + + + + ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.189/2014 RAID HODA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.210/2014 ARCHANA KRISHNAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.211/2014 SHAGUFTA HUSSAIN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.213/2014 AMIT DIXIT ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. + AND LPA No.214/2014 RISHI KANWAR Through: + +...
Tag this Judgment!