Arraignment - Judgment Search Results

R Vs. H (Appellant) (on Appeal from the Court of Appeal (Criminal Divi ...

Court: House of Lords

..... a preparatory hearing the trial shall begin with that hearing section 8 2 provides that arraignment shall accordingly take place at the start of it two important consequences follow from these ..... the criminal justice act 1987 had been ordered the appellant and the other defendants were arraigned at the commencement of the preparatory hearing and the appellant s section 8 discovery application .....

Paramjit Singh Kohli Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in: 2007(3)JKJ202

..... commenced its proceedings on 10 6 2004 and the petitioner was formally arraigned on 30 6 2004 whereafter it was adjourned sine die and ..... martial on 30 6 2004 the convening of the court martial and arraignment of the petitioner as an accused has been preceded by a ..... authority upto the month of march 2001 he submits that as the arraignment of petitioner before the general court martial was made on 30 .....

Ashok Kumar Aggarwal Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and anr.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2007(98)DRJ80

..... indian penal code hereinafter referred to as ipc two persons who are arraigned as accused persons in these proceedings are mr ashok kumar aggarwal ..... in which both the petitioner and the respondent no 2 are arraigned the scope of the present petition is to consider as to ..... or privy to an offence this must necessarily include a person arraigned before him but it may be possible to tender pardon to .....

Wallace Vs. Kato

Court: US Supreme Court

..... when for example he is bound over by a magistrate or arraigned on charges dobbs supra 39 at 74 n 2 keeton supra ..... cover the time of detention up until issuance of process or arraignment but not more from that point on any damages recoverable must ..... explained at common law damages for detention after issuance of process or arraignment would be attributable to a tort other than the unlawful arrest .....

Chandra Mohan Shukla Vs. State of Assam and anr.

Court: Guwahati

..... 34 warning of accused for trial 1 the accused before he is arraigned shall be informed by an officer of every charge for which ..... be taken accordingly the interval between his being so informed and his arraignment shall not be less than ninety six hours or where the accused ..... claim either by notice to the authority convening the court or when arraigned before the court by notice to the court that he or .....

Major Uday Nangia, Officer's Mess, Officers Training Academy Vs. the A ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2007)4MLJ140

..... 34 warning of accused for trial 1 the accused before he is arraigned shall be informed by an officer of every charge for which ..... be taken accordingly the interval between his being so informed and his arraignment shall not be less than ninety six hours or where the ..... rules requiring the list of witnesses to be given even before arraignment which is illegal as the witnesses are likely to be tampered .....

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Limited Vs. B.M. Niranjan and ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 2008ACJ554; ILR2007KAR5307; ILR2007(4)Kar5307; 2008(5)KLJ286; 2007(6)AIRKarR597; AIR2008NOC9; 2008(2)CivilLJ776; 2008ACJ554

..... cycle insured by the appellant before the mact the insured was arraigned as the first respondent filed his written statement dated 01 12 ..... of rash and negligent riding of the motor cycle the appellant arraigned as the second respondent though served with court notice remained absent ..... known as two wheeler package policy ex d1 10 the appellant arraigned as respondent no 2 before the mact on being placed .....

Court on Its own Motion Vs. K.K. Jha 'Kamal'

Court: Jharkhand

Reported in: 2008(56)BLJR477; 2008CriLJ1140; [2008(1)JCR1(Jhr)]; 2008CriLJ1140(JharH.C)(FB)

..... as gross an insult as can be imagined short of that the arraignment of the justice of the judges is arraigning the king s justice it is an impeachment of his wisdom .....

Amar Nath Vs. State and ors.

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in: 2008CriLJ86,2007(2)JKJ317

..... the sessions judge took cognizance of the offence whether or not he was then actually arraigned before him it was to convey this opinion that their lordships made the following observations ..... section 319 of the code was filed praying that remaining two accused be summoned and arraigned as accused the sessions court impleaded them as co accused that order was finally challenged .....

Ram Karan Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 2007(2)WLN521

..... court s judicial mind to perceive that it appears from the evidence that person not arraigned before it is involved in the commission of the crime and therefore the court for ..... ought not to have taken into account the defence of the person sought to be arraigned for trial while dealing with the application 17 from careful perusal of the impugned order .....