Arraignment - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: arraignment Year: 2003 Page 1 of about 3,918 results (0.054 seconds)Fatima (Mst.) Vs. State of J and K and ors.
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Aug-30-2003
Reported in: 2003(3)JKJ498
..... written report of the police officer the magistrate has power to arraigne any person as accused in the case at any time during ..... of law for a court of original jurisdiction that the person arraigned or summoned on their prima facie complicity in the commission of ..... thereafter there is no provision under code of criminal procedure to arraign the accused after taking cognizance of the offence at any stage .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKhet Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-27-2003
Reported in: 2003(2)ALT(Cri)14; RLW2004(1)Raj673; 2003(4)WLC394
..... which that person could be tried together with the accused already arraigned the power conferred on the court is discretionary as could be ..... to proceed against the non petitioners who are sought to be arraigned as accused by the component petitioner i have carefully gone ..... from the evidence already collected some other person who is not arraigned as a accused in that case has committed an offence .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBipinchandra Parshottamdas Patel (Vakil) Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-14-2003
Reported in: AIR2003SC2256; (2003)2GLR1577; JT2003(4)SC35; 2003(4)SCALE17; (2003)4SCC642; [2003]3SCR533; 2003(2)LC1116(SC)
..... as to include only proceedings after the accused is actually arraigned before the competent court for framing and facing of charges ..... meaning to include only proceedings after the accused is actually arraigned before the competent court for framing and facing the charge ..... meaning to include only proceedings after the accused is actually arraigned before the competent court for framing and facing the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEx. No. 13672886-w Naik Natwar Lal Harjiwan Das Vs. Union of India (Uo ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-25-2003
Reported in: (2004)1UPLBEC266
..... so elects rules 34 warning of accused for trial 1 the accused before he is arraigned shall be informed by an officer of every charge for which he is to be ..... 34 contemplates that the interval between the accused being informed of the charge and his arraignment shall not be less than ninety six hours or where the accused person is on .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHariharan Vs. State by Deputy Superintendent of Police Cb Cid
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-16-2003
Reported in: 2004(1)CTC38
..... the offence all of which according to the learned senior counsel would be sufficient to arraign him as partner in the crime a perusal of his evidence would show that till ..... if the alleged self incriminating evidence of p w 10 who is sought to be arraigned as accused is eschewed there is no other evidence to connect him with the crime .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTT.R. Kalra Vs. State and ors.
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Aug-29-2003
Reported in: 2004(1)JKJ595
..... 1 can be exercised only in those cases where involvement of persons other than those arraigned in the charge sheet comes to light in the course of evidence recorded during the ..... course of trial where from the court can prima facie conclude that the person not arraigned before it is also involved in the commission of the crime for which he can .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNavdeep Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Dec-24-2003
Reported in: 2004(2)JKJ623
..... 20 a of the b s f act the petitioner however pleaded not guilty on arraignment the court recorded the evidence after following the procedure of plea of not guilty under ..... to the accused and signed by the court and attached to the proceedings in the arraignment of the accused a question was put to navdeep singh accused petitioner are you guilty .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGula Vs. State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-17-2003
Reported in: 2003(3)MPHT339; 2003(3)MPLJ419
..... of rs 1500 as compensation to harkubai widow of the deceased rupa initially appellant was arraign for having committed culpable homicide not amounting to murder an offence punishable under section 304 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChanchal Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Aug-13-2003
Reported in: 2003(3)JKJ381
..... court may after sub rule 2 has been complied with and before the accused is arraigned on the alternative charge or charges withdraw such alternative charge or charges as follow the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK. Pandurangan, Provident Fund Inspector/Enforcement Officer Vs. Abdul ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-22-2003
Reported in: (2003)IILLJ318Mad
..... learned district munsif cum judicial magistrate vaniyambadi vellore district acquitting the respondents herein who were arraigned as a1 and a3 respectively 2 1 the prosecution was initiated at the instance of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial