Arraignment - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: arraignment Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 3,405 results (0.036 seconds)United States Vs. Vonn
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-04-2002
..... along with his appointed counsel appeared in court for his arraignment again the magistrate judge told vonn about his rights including ..... appearance before the magistrate judge and twice at his first arraignment the record shows that four times either vonn or his ..... s rehearing motion requesting to make the first appearance and arraignment transcripts part of the appellate record for that reason even .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNirmal Lakra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2002
Reported in: 2003(1)SLJ151(Delhi)
..... charge for the same offence as that in respect of which he is arraigned the question for the jury on the issue is whether the defendant has ..... previously been in jeopardy in respect of the charge on which he is arraigned for the rule of law is that a person must not be ..... are sworn or affirmed as above mentioned the accused shall be arraigned on the charges against him 2 the charges on which the accused .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMunna Singh and anr. Vs. State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: Apr-03-2002
..... 319 can be exercised only in these cases where involvement of persons other than those arraigned in the charge sheet comes to light in the course of evidence recorded during the ..... 1 can be exercised only in those cases where involvement of persons other than those arraigned in the charge sheet comes to light in the course of evidence recorded during enquiry .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Maharashtra Vs. Lahu Laxman Pabale and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-24-2002
Reported in: 2003BomCR(Cri)400; 2003CriLJ1174
..... posed the question viz if all the accused persons could not be arraigned whether some of them could be so arraigned and answered his own question in the negative holding that no .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNallabothu Venkaiah Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-20-2002
Reported in: AIR2002SC2945; 2002(2)ALD(Cri)441; 2002(2)ALT(Cri)305; 2002CriLJ4081; 2002(3)Crimes221(SC); JT2002(6)SC213; 2002(6)SCALE26; (2002)7SCC117; [2002]SUPP1SCR606
..... state of kerala 1993 3scc722 deciding review petition no 1394 of 1993 six accused were arraigned for offences punishable under sections 302 324 323 341 148 read with section 149 i ..... four appellants commit 19 in atmaram zingaraji v state of maharashtra 1997crilj4406 nine persons were arraigned as accused before the trial court under section 149 302 326 ipc no other person .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShri P.V. Narasimha Rao Vs. State Through Cbi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-15-2002
Reported in: 2002CriLJ2401; 97(2002)DLT452; 2002(63)DRJ331
..... or indirectly concerned in or privy to an offence this must necessarily include a person arraigned before him but it may possible to tender pardon to a person not so ..... arraigned the power so conferred can also be exercised at any time after the case is .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEx. Havildar K.P. Pandey Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2002
Reported in: 2003(3)SLJ463(Delhi)
..... army rule 34 34 warning of accused for trial 1 the accused before he is arraigned shall be informed by an officer of every charge for which he is to be ..... those step shall be taken accordingly the interval between his being so informed and his arraignment shall not be less than ninety six hours or where the accused person is on .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRaj Ambarish Sen Alias Ambarish Sen Vs. the State of West Bengal
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jun-17-2002
Reported in: 2003CriLJ3830
..... or 307 of the code it is not necessary that the person concerned should be arraigned as an accused but on the other hand such tender can be given even to ..... the intention of me legislature in this regard and a person who has not been arraigned as an accused is also to be given this privilege by the court and hence .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Orissa Vs. Dibakar Naik and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-23-2002
Reported in: AIR2002SC2148; 2002(1)ALD(Cri)934; 2002CriLJ2826; 2002(2)Crimes279(SC); JT2002(4)SC303; 2002(4)SCALE62; (2002)5SCC323; [2002]3SCR307
..... s imagination and phantasy it concerns itself with the question as to whether the accused arraigned at the trail is guilty of the crime with which he is charged crime is ..... stunt film the legal trail isconducted to ascertain the guilt or innocence of the accused arraigned in arriving at a conclusion about the truth the courts are required to adopt rational .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBiru Teli Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-10-2002
Reported in: 2002CriLJ4538
..... learned magistrate for commitment only however there is no doubt that such person can be arraigned as an accused in exercise of power under section 319 of the code when some ..... materials are brought on the record in course of trial or such person can be arraigned by the sessions judge in accordance with section 193 of the code 10 from going .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial