Argumentative - Judgment Search Results
“after Addressing Arguments for Some Time Vs. the State of Haryana a ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-29-2012
the penalty. The order dated 21.12.2010, passed in CWP No.22800 of 2010, reads as follows: - “After addressing arguments for some time, counsel for the petitioners gives up challenge to the orders of ejectment but states that
The Only Argument Raised Against the Notice of Compulsory Retirement V ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Oct-07-2013
or not?. 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. RAJIV NARAIN RAINA, J. The only argument raised against the notice of compulsory retirement is that a mercy petition has been filed by the petitioner
Oral Arguments Advanced During the Hearing the Council Vs. N.C.T.E and ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-02-2014
attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh CWP No.12200 of 2014 -2- oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded that the appeal deserves to be remanded to NRC with a
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Complainant. the Argument Is That Subsequently the Complainant Who Is ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-18-2014
I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRM No.M-21808 of 2014 2 complainant. The argument is that subsequently the complainant, who is real brother of the petitioner, became inimical and has lodged a
“7. We Do Not Find Any Force in the Arguments Raised by the Vs. Fina ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-16-2012
& others 2005 (2) PLR 9.has held as under: “7. We do not find any force in the arguments raised by the counsel for the petitioner. It is well settled that the choice of the Collector in
“i Have Considered the Arguments Advanced by the Ld. Vs. Financial C ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-17-2013
in the village. Relevant portion of order dated 25.08.2010 of the Commissioner reads thus: “I have considered the arguments advanced by the ld. counsel for the parties and have gone through the record received in the case.
“i Have Gone Through the Record and Considered the Arguments Vs. Dha ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-22-2013
26.6.2006. Relevant portion of the order reads thus :- “I have gone through the record and considered the arguments advanced on behalf of both the parties. It is clear from the record that appellant had been held
“yesterday We Had After Hearing the Arguments of Shri Rajesh Garg Vs ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
held in the operative part of the judgment and order as follows: “Yesterday, we had after hearing the arguments of Shri Rajesh Garg for some time, adjourned the case for today with a direction to him to
“i Have Heard the Arguments of Both the Parties and Vs. Gram Panchay ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-10-2013
sale deed is not on record of this case. It was also not shown at the time of argument. To claim ownership, reliance has been placed upon mutation entries (Annexures P-1 & Sailesh Ranjan 2013.07.31 10:17 I
“8. After Hearing Arguments from Both the Sides and Perusing Vs. Fin ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-20-2013
the Collector and remanded the matter, for a fresh consideration, after holding as follows: - “8. After hearing arguments from both the sides and perusing through the relevant record brought on the file, I agree with the
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free