Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Argue - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 31 2013

Argued by : Mr. R.S.Mittal Senior Advocate Vs. Jasbir Singh and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Aug-31-2013

be referred to the Reporters or not?. Yes 3) Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?.Yes Argued by : Mr. R.S.Mittal, Senior Advocate, with Mr. C.S.Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. V.K.Jain, Senior Advocate, with


Aug 31 2013

Argued By: Mr. Himanshu Aggarwal Advocate Vs. Chander Bhan and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Aug-31-2013

referred to the Reporters or not?. Yes 3) Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. Yes Argued by: Mr.Himanshu Aggarwal, Advocate, for Mr.C.B.Geol, Advocate, for the petitioneRs.Mr.Amit Jain, Advocate, for the respondents. **** PARAMJEET SINGH,


Feb 19 2013

Argued By:- Dr.Anmol Rattan Sidhu Senior Advocate with Vs. Manmeet Kau ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Feb-19-2013

19.2.2013 Sandeep Singh & Ors. .....Petitioners Versus Manmeet Kaur Randhawa .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Argued by:- Dr.Anmol Rattan Sidhu, Senior Advocate with Mr.Karan Vir Nanda, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.Kanwaljit Singh, Senior Advocate


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 02 2013

Argued by : Mr. R.K.Gupta Advocate Vs. Ram Diya and Another

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Sep-02-2013

referred to the Reporters or not?. Yes 3) Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. Yes Argued by : Mr. R.K.Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioners. None for the respondents. **** PARAMJEET SINGH, J.Instant civil revision


Jan 10 2014

Argued By: Mr. Rajiv Kataria Advocate Vs. State of Punjab and Another

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jan-10-2014

Jindal ..... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another .... Respondents -- CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DR.BHARAT BHUSHAN PARSOON Argued by: Mr. Rajiv Kataria, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Yatinder Sharma, Addl. A.G., Punjab for the respondents. ***


Feb 04 2014

Argued By:- Mr. H.C. Arora Advocate Vs. Punjab National Bank and Anoth ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Feb-04-2014

B.D.Dawar. .........Petitioner. Versus Punjab National Bank and another .........Respondents. CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dr. Bharat Bhushan Parsoon. ***** Argued by:- Mr. H.C. Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. G.S.Bajwa, Advocate for the respondents. Dr. Bharat Bhushan Parsoon,


Feb 04 2014

Argued By:- Mr. Amit Dhawan Advocate for the Petitioner. Vs. State of ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Feb-04-2014

2014. Rakesh Kumar. .........Petitioner. Versus State of Punjab. .........Respondent. CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dr. Bharat Bhushan Parsoon. ***** Argued by:- Mr. Amit Dhawan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.D.S.Sidhu, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. J.S. Lalli, Advocate


Feb 13 2014

Argued By:- Mr. Ramesh Hooda Advocate Vs. Presiding Officer Industrial ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Feb-13-2014

Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Rohtak and another .........Respondents. CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dr. Bharat Bhushan Parsoon. ***** Argued by:- Mr. Ramesh Hooda, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Babbar Khan, Advocate for Mr. R.S. Chahar, Advocate for


Feb 13 2014

Argued By:- Mr. Som Nath Saini Advocate Vs. the Punjab State Electrici ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Feb-13-2014

The Punjab State Electricity Board, Patiala and others .........Respondents. CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dr. Bharat Bhushan Parsoon. ***** Argued by:- Mr. Som Nath Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.N. Mehtani, Advocate for the respondents. Dr. Bharat


Feb 13 2014

Argued By:- Mr. S.K. Pipat Senior Advocate with Vs. the Controlling Au ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Feb-13-2014

Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, Ambala and others .........Respondents. CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dr. Bharat Bhushan Parsoon. ***** Argued by:- Mr. S.K. Pipat, Senior Advocate with Mr. Manoj Pundir, Advocate for the petitioner. None for the respondents.


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial