Arbitrary - Judgment Search Results

Bachan Singh S/O Saudagar Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1982)3SCC24; 19831SCR145;

..... against the legislature the fundamental rights erect a protective armour for the individual against arbitrary or unreasonable executive or legislative action 237 there are three fundamental rights in the ..... in the united states was unconstitutional because it was being used in an arbitrary manner and such arbitrariness in capital punishment was a violation of the eighth amendment prohibition against .....

Justice k.s.puttaswamy(retd) Vs. Union of India

Court: Supreme Court of India

..... essence limited government or a limitation on government constitutionalism is the antithesis of arbitrary powers as professor vile has remarked western institutional theorists have concerned themselves with ..... the spirit of the constitution judicial review is intended as a check against arbitrary conduct of individuals holding constitutional posts it holds public functionaries accountable to .....

Shayara Bano Vs. Union of India and Ors. Ministry of Women and Child D ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

..... outrageous scandalizingly unusual or cruel and rehabilitatively counter productive is unarguably unreasonable and arbitrary and is shot down by articles 14 and 19 and if inflicted with ..... would apply to invalidate legislation as well as subordinate legislation under article 14 manifest arbitrariness therefore must be something done by the legislature capriciously irrationally and or without .....

Smt. B. Lalithamma Vs. Government Of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

..... special court as per annexure h as without competence and jurisdiction and otherwise being arbitrary illegal and void declare that the provisions of the karnataka land grabbing prohibition ..... irrationally and or without adequacy has legislated it has been further held 101 manifest arbitrariness therefore must be something done by the legislature capriciously irrationally and or without adequate .....

Sri Shivalingaiah Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

..... special court as per annexure h as without competence and jurisdiction and otherwise being arbitrary illegal and void declare that the provisions of the karnataka land grabbing prohibition ..... irrationally and or without adequacy has legislated it has been further held 101 manifest arbitrariness therefore must be something done by the legislature capriciously irrationally and or without adequate .....

Smt. Motamma Vs. Deputy Commissioner

Court: Karnataka

..... special court as per annexure h as without competence and jurisdiction and otherwise being arbitrary illegal and void declare that the provisions of the karnataka land grabbing prohibition ..... irrationally and or without adequacy has legislated it has been further held 101 manifest arbitrariness therefore must be something done by the legislature capriciously irrationally and or without adequate .....

Shri. Muniraju Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

..... special court as per annexure h as without competence and jurisdiction and otherwise being arbitrary illegal and void declare that the provisions of the karnataka land grabbing prohibition ..... irrationally and or without adequacy has legislated it has been further held 101 manifest arbitrariness therefore must be something done by the legislature capriciously irrationally and or without adequate .....

K Ravindra Reddy Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

..... special court as per annexure h as without competence and jurisdiction and otherwise being arbitrary illegal and void declare that the provisions of the karnataka land grabbing prohibition ..... irrationally and or without adequacy has legislated it has been further held 101 manifest arbitrariness therefore must be something done by the legislature capriciously irrationally and or without adequate .....

Rama Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

..... special court as per annexure h as without competence and jurisdiction and otherwise being arbitrary illegal and void declare that the provisions of the karnataka land grabbing prohibition ..... irrationally and or without adequacy has legislated it has been further held 101 manifest arbitrariness therefore must be something done by the legislature capriciously irrationally and or without adequate .....

Smt. Shankaramani Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

..... special court as per annexure h as without competence and jurisdiction and otherwise being arbitrary illegal and void declare that the provisions of the karnataka land grabbing prohibition ..... irrationally and or without adequacy has legislated it has been further held 101 manifest arbitrariness therefore must be something done by the legislature capriciously irrationally and or without adequate .....