Approach - Judgment Search Results

Rite Approach Group Ltd. Vs. Rosoboronexport

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2006SC401; 2006(1)ALT24(SC); 2005(3)ARBLR465(SC); [2006]129CompCas771(SC); (2006)2CompLJ82(SC); 2005(85)DRJ265; JT2005(9)SC527; 2005(9)SCALE361; (2006)1SCC206; 2006(1)LC

M/s ROSOBORONEXPORT is 27/3, Stromynika STR Moscow, 107076.4. That between October 1999 and April 2000 M/s Russian Technologies approached the petitioner for procuring orders in India for supply of helicopters to Border Security Force, Ministry of Home

Rite Approach Group Ltd. Vs. Rosoboronexport

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2004(3)ARBLR316(Delhi); 111(2004)DLT816; 2004(75)DRJ104

of Russia. The respondent has its office at Moscow. According to the petitioner, in 1999-2000, M/s. Russian Technologies approached the petitioner for procuring orders in India for supply of helicopters to Border Security Force, Ministry of Home

Rite Approach Group Ltd. Vs. Rosoboronexport

Court: Delhi

Reported in: AIR2007Delhi145; 2007(2)ARBLR443(Delhi); 139(2007)DLT55

Sanjiv Khanna, J.1. M/s. Rite Approach Group Ltd (hereinafter referred to as the appellant, for short) has filed the present Appeal against the Order

The Petitioner Approached the Central Administrative Tribunal Vs. Unio ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Salim, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Parveen Goyal, Advocate, for the respondents. **** SANJAY KISHAN KAUL C.J.(Oral) The petitioner approached the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, aggrieved of the Departmental Promotion Committee not finding him fit for promotion

“The Petitioners Have Approached This Court Vs. Gursewak Singh and a ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

While disposing of CWP No.18941 of 2012, this Court passed the following order on 24.9.2012: “The petitioners have approached this court for refund of fees after attending the couRs.for a period of one year. Their grievance is

The Only Issue on Which the Respondent No.1 Approached the Vs. Darshan ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Chaudhary, Advocate, for the respondents. **** SANJAY KISHAN KAUL C.J.(Oral) The only issue on which the respondent No.1 approached the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench was qua the fixation of his pay scale. The grievance made was

“11. the Plaintiff Had Approached the Court with a Vs. Bisham Kumar ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

and decree dated 13.01.2012. While dismissing the appeal, the lower appellate Court observed as under:“11. The plaintiff had approached the Court with a plea that his real brother Kamal Chand had given his share in the land