Appraised Value - Judgment Search Results

Chennai Customs Appraising Officers Assn. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2008(8)SCALE91; (2008)7SCC278; 2008AIRSCW6689

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Interpretation of the Customs Appraisers' Service, Class II Recruitment Rules, 1961 (for short 'the 1961 Rules') and the Department of Revenue (Customs Appraisers)

Principal Appraiser (Exports), Collectorate of Customs and Central Exc ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1995(80)ELT3(SC); JT1995(7)SC260; 1995(5)SCALE683; (1995)6SCC536; [1995]Supp4SCR214

S.B. Majmudar. J. The Principal Appraiser (Exports), Collectorate of Customs & Central Excise, Customs House, Cochin-3, the Appellate Collector of Customs, Customs & Central … Section 16(1) as applicable at the relevant time read as under: "16(1). The rate of duty and tariff valuation, if any applicable to any export goods, shall be the rate and valuation in force, (a) in the

R. Gnanasekaran, Appraiser, vs the Addl.Registrar,

Court: Chennai

unsuccessful writ petitioner is before us. 2.The writ petitioner, who is the appellant herein, was appointed as an appraiser in the respondent Co-operative Bank on 10.12.1997. He was dismissed from service vide order dated 05.12.2005. Questioning the

Appraiser, Madras Customs Vs. Tamil Nadu Newsprint Papers Ltd.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 1988(36)ELT272(Mad)

levy and collection of auxiliary duty of customs at an amount equal to fifty per cent of the value of the goods, in the case of goods mentioned in the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act.

The Appraiser, Appraising Department (Group Ii), Madras Customs, Custo ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 1988(17)ECC119

levy and collection of auxiliary duty of customs at an amount equal to fifty per cent of the value of the goods, in the case of goods mentioned in the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act. … Petition Nos. 2054, 3257 and 3258 of 1983*Reported as Tamil Nadu News print and Papers Ltd. v. The Appraiser in : 1988(33)ELT22(Mad) . are dismissed. There will be no order as to costs. Customs - Exemption--Tariff items--Respondent

K.Jayakumar, Appraiser, Custom House, Kochi Vs. Union of India Represe ...

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Hon'ble Mr.George Paracken, Judicial Member The applicant is presently working as Appraiser in the Custom House, Kochi. He has filed this O.A against the Annexure A-5 order of the 2nd

Tamil Nadu Newsprint and Papers Ltd. Vs. the Appraiser, Appraiser Depa ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2000SC728; 2000(1)ALD(Cri)475; 2000(67)ECC592; 2000LC744(SC); 2000(116)ELT3(SC); JT2000(1)SC313; 2000(1)SCALE228; (2000)2SCC75; [2000]1SCR327

in turn be sub-delegated to the Chairman alone in the absence of a provision such as sub-sec. (4A) added to sec. 10E after the impugned order was issued, and which now enabled the solidarity of the Board

Tamil Nadu Newsprint and Papers Ltd., Madras Vs. Appraiser, Madras Cus ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 1988(15)ECC6; 1988(33)ELT22(Mad)

registered under Heading 84.66, they have to bear the auxiliary duty to the extent of 20% of the value as per the Notification 61/83-Customs, dated 1-3-1983. The body of the Notification 62/83-Customs, dated 1-3-1983 and the relevant

Syed Kaleemullah and anr. Vs. the Appraising Officer, Special Investig ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 1997(57)ECC83

the order passed by the learned Magistrate extending the remand of the petitioner can cease to have any value in the eye of law. Late in the evening of 24.5.1993, C.B.I. had taken over investigation. Before they

Standard Batteries Ltd. Vs. Appraiser, Appraising Deptt. and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 1981(8)ELT257(Mad)

; G.S.G.A. and Co. v. State of Andhra Pradesh, 30 S.T.C. 120. Mr. U. N. R. Rao has added the decision in Shiv Shankar Dal Mills v. State of Haryana, : [1980]1SCR1170 . 13. No exception can