Skip to content


Appointing Authority - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: appointing authority Page 1 of about 6 results (0.033 seconds)
May 01 2001 (HC)

R.K. Singh Vs. Director/Appointing Authority and Another

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: [2001(89)FLR1121]; 2001LabIC3528; (2001)2UPLBEC1282

the initiative of private individuals, and a Government Officer was appointed on deputation to manage its affairs. Several Government authorities are Register even after a cross was put in by the authority was absent.4. It is further alleged in paragraph 4 of

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 06 1998 (HC)

Daily Navajyoti Vs. Appointed Authority U/S. 17(1) of Working Journali ...

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: (1998)IILLJ705Raj; 1998(2)WLC710

Kala has vigorously canvassed that Respondent No. 2, who was appointed as a Working Journalist, continuously served with the appellant Establishment of the Act, which are more beneficial to him. The Authority further held that it had the jurisdiction to investigate the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 25 2009 (HC)

Sunil Kumar Dash Vs. the District Judge-cum-appointing Authority and a ...

Court: Orissa

Reported in: 107(2009)CLT756

on receipt, will be scrutinized in the office of the appointing authority and all adverse remarks will be communicated to the receipt, will be scrutinized in the office of the appointing authority and all adverse remarks will be communicated to the employee

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 29 2016 (HC)

B. Lakshmikanth Vs. The General Manager (Net Work-II), Appointing Auth ...

Court: Chennai

controlling authority who may be an officer subordinate to the appointing authority. Thus, the learned counsel for the respondents sought for India Officers' Service Rules, 1992, the 2nd respondent herein (disciplinary authority) is competent to issue charge memo and suspension order. Rules

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 17 2015 (SC)

Pawan Kumar Agarwala Vs. General Manager-Ii and Appointing Authority a ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

be imposed upon him vide Order dated 01.02.2006. Accordingly, the Appointing Authority passed the Order dated 24.04.2006 for removal of the disclosing the earlier transaction with the appellant's Branch. The disciplinary authority has taken the view that charge Nos. 3 and 5

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 31 2018 (HC)

Sharwan Kumar Vigmal vs.general Manager (Nw-Ii)/(Appointing Authority) ...

Court: Delhi

Supreme Court had directed that promotion be granted because the appointing authority had rejected the recommendation of Selection Board for promotion, Court had directed that promotion be granted because the appointing authority had rejected the recommendation of Selection Board for promotion, without

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.
  • Next >>

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //