Appointing Authority - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: appointing authority Page 1 of about 6 results (0.033 seconds)R.K. Singh Vs. Director/Appointing Authority and Another
Court: Allahabad
Reported in: [2001(89)FLR1121]; 2001LabIC3528; (2001)2UPLBEC1282
the initiative of private individuals, and a Government Officer was appointed on deputation to manage its affairs. Several Government authorities are Register even after a cross was put in by the authority was absent.4. It is further alleged in paragraph 4 of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDaily Navajyoti Vs. Appointed Authority U/S. 17(1) of Working Journali ...
Court: Rajasthan
Reported in: (1998)IILLJ705Raj; 1998(2)WLC710
Kala has vigorously canvassed that Respondent No. 2, who was appointed as a Working Journalist, continuously served with the appellant Establishment of the Act, which are more beneficial to him. The Authority further held that it had the jurisdiction to investigate the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSunil Kumar Dash Vs. the District Judge-cum-appointing Authority and a ...
Court: Orissa
Reported in: 107(2009)CLT756
on receipt, will be scrutinized in the office of the appointing authority and all adverse remarks will be communicated to the receipt, will be scrutinized in the office of the appointing authority and all adverse remarks will be communicated to the employee
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTB. Lakshmikanth Vs. The General Manager (Net Work-II), Appointing Auth ...
Court: Chennai
controlling authority who may be an officer subordinate to the appointing authority. Thus, the learned counsel for the respondents sought for India Officers' Service Rules, 1992, the 2nd respondent herein (disciplinary authority) is competent to issue charge memo and suspension order. Rules
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPawan Kumar Agarwala Vs. General Manager-Ii and Appointing Authority a ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
be imposed upon him vide Order dated 01.02.2006. Accordingly, the Appointing Authority passed the Order dated 24.04.2006 for removal of the disclosing the earlier transaction with the appellant's Branch. The disciplinary authority has taken the view that charge Nos. 3 and 5
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSharwan Kumar Vigmal vs.general Manager (Nw-Ii)/(Appointing Authority) ...
Court: Delhi
Supreme Court had directed that promotion be granted because the appointing authority had rejected the recommendation of Selection Board for promotion, Court had directed that promotion be granted because the appointing authority had rejected the recommendation of Selection Board for promotion, without
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>