Appointed - Judgment Search Results
In Re: Appointment of Guardians for the New Born Male Child (Now Known ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-30-2004
Reported in: 2005(2)BomCR655; 2005(1)MhLj924
aforesaid averments, the Petitioners Nos. 3 and 4 are supporting the Petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 for being appointed as a guardian. 3. The learned counsel for the Petitioner has stated that this appointment of the guardian
In Re: Appointment of Guardian of Person of a Female Minor Rita Pierre ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-31-2005
Reported in: 2005(4)ALLMR765; 2006(2)BomCR669; 2005(4)MhLj848
of surrender, they must request for an additional process of referring the case to the Child Welfare Committee, appointed under the Juvenile Justice Act, 2000 for further inquiry and declaring the Child legally free for adoption.13. Whenever
Appointment No Objection Was Raised. the Named Arbitrator Sent a Notic ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-21-2013
is stated that on asking of the petitioner, as per terms and conditions of the agreement, Mr.L.R.Kochhar was appointed as an Arbitrator on 21.12.2010. To his appointment, no objection was raised. The named Arbitrator sent a notice
18-section briefs on any result in this list
“The Appointment Is Being Offered to them to Accommodate them Vs. Pu ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Oct-03-2013
the other Department.4. The State, in its written statement, took the plea that the said Junior Engineers were appointed purely on 89 days basis only to meet the threat of the strike of Junior Engineers and on
Appointment of Justices
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1790
of the Federal Government, their respective commissions were read, and they were qualified according to law. John Jay, appointed Chief Justice, by a commission bearing date the 26th of September, 1789. Wm. Cushing, appointed one of the
Appointment of Paterson
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1793
APPOINTMENT OF PATERSON - 2 U.S. 479 (1793) U.S. Supreme Court APPOINTMENT OF PATERSON, 2 U.S. 479 (1793) 2
Yogesh Mehta Vs. Custodian Appointed Under the Special Court and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-04-2007
Reported in: 2007(4)ALLMR(SC)781; 2007(1)BLJR221; (2007)1CompLJ232(SC); 2007(1)CTLJ84(SC); [2007(2)JCR114(SC)]; (2007)3MLJ501; 2007(1)SCALE105; (2007)2SCC624; 2007(1)LC0093(SC); 2007AIRSCW885
is submitted. The Highest bidder shall be at liberty to appear before the Hon'ble Supreme Court on the appointed date.The initial deposit made by all the unsuccessful bidders shall be refunded to the bidders. [Emphasis supplied]This Court
Tro Vs. Custodian Appointed Under the Special Court (Trial of Offences ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-17-2007
the decretal amount on behalf of M/s Dhanraj Mills (P) Ltd. The Special court on 14th Feb., 2003 appointed a receiver for taking charge of certain assets and properties of M/s Killick Nixon (P) Ltd. and the
P.R.Krishnakumar, vs Authority Appointed Under
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-03-2025
2011 P.R.Krishnakumar, Employer, Saranya Multi Speciality Ayurvedic Hospital, Mavuthampathy, Navakkarai Village, Coimbatore - 641 105. ...Petitioner Vs.1. Authority Appointed under the Minimum Wages Act / Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Coimbatore.2. Assistant Inspector of Labour, 4th Circle, Coimbatore
Sunir Khurana Vs. Appointments Committee of The
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-17-2015
37 days delay in filing the appeal is condoned.2. Application is disposed of. LPA4482015 1. The Appellant initially appointed as Assistant Divisional Manager with MMTC Ltd.in the year 1980 and rose to the post of Chief General
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free