Skip to content


Application - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: application Sorted by: recent Year: 2011 Page 1 of about 317 results (0.152 seconds)
Dec 31 2011 (TRI)

The Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd.,, Angamali, Rep.by Its Manager and Anot ...

Court: Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram

Decided on: Dec-31-2011

..... insurer to settle the claim on non standard basis the national commission has approved the application of non standard basis of settlement in similar cases national insurance co ltd vs kamal .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 30 2011 (HC)

Komaran and anr. Vs. C.Subramaniam

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-30-2011

..... returned back from palacod 5 the court below dismissed the said application rejecting the plea of suffering from jaundice stating that the ..... revision petitioners have not given sufficient cause for filing the application under section 5 of the limitation act and the reason ..... by this court in a number of cases whilst considering applications for condonation of delay under section 5 of the limitation .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 30 2011 (TRI)

Dr. Agarwal’s Eye Hospital Vs. G. Nisha and Others

Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai

Decided on: Dec-30-2011

..... merit 4 the district forum considering various decisions as well as the applicability of order 23 since not made applicable as per the provision of the consumer protection act came to the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 30 2011 (TRI)

Mda/Hsc/112 Rmtc Employees Housing Co-operative Welfare Society Rep. b ...

Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai

Decided on: Dec-30-2011

..... filing separate written version had taken the same stand viz that as per the individual application given by the complainants loan facility was extended and as agreed by the complainants amounts ..... an admitted fact that the complainants being the members of the society have submitted their applications paid some amounts also though not as pleaded in each complaint but as concluded by .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 30 2011 (TRI)

Standard Chartered Bank Ltd., Gundlays Centre Vs. B. Ananthanarayanan ...

Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai

Decided on: Dec-30-2011

..... form and increased payment is received on or before 30 6 2001 which may be applicable for the continuous renewal it appears there is no bar taking the policy or seeking .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 30 2011 (TRI)

Nestle India Ltd., Rep. by Its General Manager and Others Vs. M. Gurub ...

Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai

Decided on: Dec-30-2011

..... wrapper the terms and conditions pertaining to the scheme were printed the scheme was not applicable to the state of tamil nadu by virtue of operation of law the complainants ignorance ..... the following conclusion 11 the opposite parties had offered a prize scheme which is not applicable to consumers in tamil nadu the prize scheme prohibited in tamil nadu has been advertised .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 30 2011 (HC)

Ms.City Tex Private Limited, Vs. the Commercial Tax Officer, Auto Naga ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Dec-30-2011

..... found the dealer was assessed at a rate lower than the applicable rate or the turnover escaped assessment the vat act came ..... revising authority subject to the same limitations and conditions as are applicable in the case of assessing authority 6 unlike section14 1 ..... of clarifying the context or a situation for the purpose of applicability or inapplicability or some times for enlarging the scope of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 30 2011 (HC)

Commissioner of Income Tax, Visakhapatna Vs. Ms. Andhra Ferro Alloys ( ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Dec-30-2011

..... 52 23 790 made by the assessing officer 2 the tribunal on application of the revenue under section 256 1 of the act referred ..... electricity charges later contrary to the agreement the apseb charged the rate applicable to category iii and raised a higher demand then the assessee ..... has to pay the actual liability on or before the due date applicable in his case for furnishing the return of income in the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 30 2011 (HC)

Vantipalli Veera Venkata Satya Harischan Vs. Surapuraju Ramesh S/O.Nag ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Dec-30-2011

..... is dismissed whereas the petitioner was a manager godavari grameena bank rajahmundry the bail application moved by the petitioner came to be allowed on 20 01 2004 smt g vasantha ..... issued summons learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the averments in the bail application filed by the petitioner do not constitute imputations against the 1st respondent complainant or against .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 29 2011 (TRI)

Baburajan P.M., Managing Director and Others Vs. M.T. James, Director, ...

Court: Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram

Decided on: Dec-29-2011

..... they have not promptly discharged their liability to the complainant instead of discharging their contractional application opposite parties are targeting each other for the generator set for escaping from their legal .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //