Skip to content


Application - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: application Sorted by: recent Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 302 results (0.132 seconds)
Dec 31 2002 (TRI)

Dhimant Trading Co. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Dec-31-2002

Reported in: (2003)(159)ELT421Tri(Mum.)bai

..... notices cannot be justified for the reason that the same procedure that was subsequently made applicable by virtue of board s instructions contained in various trade notices issued by the commissioner ..... sheets or strips and throughout it believed that it had received coils and therefore the applicability of the extended period is justified he contended that the circular of the board will .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 31 2002 (HC)

The Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. B.S. Sundaravadivel Mudaliar and So ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-31-2002

Reported in: (2003)181CTR(Mad)544

..... the provisions of section 40 b of the act have no application the commissioner of income tax appeals allowed the appeals preferred by ..... in exercise of the powers under section 67 for making an application to the director does not mean that the suo motu power which ..... in exercise of the powers under section 67 for making an application to the director does not mean that the suo motu power which .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 31 2002 (HC)

Cit Vs. B.S. Sundaravadivel Mudatiar and Sons

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-31-2002

Reported in: [2003]128TAXMAN74(Mad)

..... the provisions of section 40 b of the act have no application the commissioner appeals allowed the appeals preferred by the assessee for ..... in exercise of the powers under section 67 for making an application to the director does not mean that the suo motu power which ..... in exercise of the powers under section 67 for making an application to the director does not mean that the suo motu power which .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 31 2002 (HC)

Tamil Nadu Brick and Tile Mfrs. Industrial Service Co-operative Societ ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-31-2002

Reported in: [2003]129TAXMAN343(Mad)

..... claim on the ground that the payment was only by way of application or appropriation of net profit already earned and cannot be deducted ..... in exercise of the powers under section 67 for making an application to the director does not mean that the suo motu power which ..... in exercise of the powers under section 67 for making an application to the director does not mean that the suo motu power which .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 31 2002 (HC)

The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Coromandel Indag Products P. Ltd.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-31-2002

Reported in: (2003)183CTR(Mad)90; [2004]265ITR611(Mad)

..... irrelevant extraneous or inadmissible considerations or is arrived at by the application of wrong principles of law we hold that the above ..... in exercise of the powers under section 67 for making an application to the director does not mean that the suo motu power which ..... in exercise of the powers under section 67 for making an application to the director does not mean that the suo motu power which .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 31 2002 (HC)

The Tamil Nadu Brick and Tile Manufacturers Industrial Service Co.Oper ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-31-2002

Reported in: (2003)182CTR(Mad)158; [2004]265ITR332(Mad)

..... claim on the ground that the payment was only by way of application or appropriation of net profit already earned and cannot be deducted ..... in exercise of the powers under section 67 for making an application to the director does not mean that the suo motu power which ..... in exercise of the powers under section 67 for making an application to the director does not mean that the suo motu power which .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 31 2002 (HC)

United India Insurance Company Ltd. and anr. Vs. Tiruvalluvar Transpor ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-31-2002

Reported in: 2003(1)CTC156; (2003)1MLJ323

..... in exercise of the powers under section 67 for making an application to the director does not mean that the suo motu power which ..... taken away therefore the contention of the respondent that making an application is sine qua non for invoking the power under section 5 ..... in exercise of the powers under section 67 for making an application to the director does not mean that the suo motu power which .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 31 2002 (HC)

The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Tamil Nadu Sugar Corporation Limite ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-31-2002

Reported in: (2003)182CTR(Mad)61; [2004]265ITR466(Mad)

..... in exercise of the powers under section 67 for making an application to the director does not mean that the suo motu power which ..... taken away therefore the contention of the respondent that making an application is sine qua non for invoking the power under section 5 ..... in exercise of the powers under section 67 for making an application to the director does not mean that the suo motu power which .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 31 2002 (HC)

United India Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Tiruvalluvar Transport Corpora ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-31-2002

Reported in: I(2003)ACC553; 2004ACJ801

..... in exercise of the powers under section 67 for making an application to the director does not mean that the suo motu power which ..... taken away therefore the contention of the respondent that making an application is sine qua non for invoking the power under section 5 ..... in exercise of the powers under section 67 for making an application to the director does not mean that the suo motu power which .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 31 2002 (HC)

The Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. the Kanyakumari Dist. Co-op. Spinni ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-31-2002

Reported in: (2003)182CTR(Mad)151; [2003]264ITR684(Mad)

..... in exercise of the powers under section 67 for making an application to the director does not mean that the suo motu power which ..... taken away therefore the contention of the respondent that making an application is sine qua non for invoking the power under section 5 ..... in exercise of the powers under section 67 for making an application to the director does not mean that the suo motu power which .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //