Applicant - Judgment Search Results

…applicants. Vs. Bhagwati Developers Private Limited

Court: Kolkata

Peerless General Finance and Investment Company Limited and another …Applicants. Versus Bhagwati Developers Private Limited …Respondent. For the applicants: Mr.Bhaskar Prasad Gupta, Mr.A.Chatterjee, Mr.T.Nag Chowdhury, Mr.A.Basu. For the applicants in A.C.O.Nos.162 and 163 of 2013: Mr.Saktinath Mukherjee,

Applicable to the Facts of the Present Case. Respondent No.1 Vs. Kirpa ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

and others ....Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Jasbir Singh Hon'ble Mr.Justice G.S.Sandhawalia Present:- Mr.Mandhir Singh Virk, Advocate, for the applicant-appellant Mr.Sandeep Punchhi, Advocate, for the respondents --- Jasbir Singh, J. (Oral) This Letters Patent Appeal has been filed

Navjeet Kaur ....Applicant- Appellant Vs. Navjeet Kaur ....Applicant- ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Singh ....Non-applicant - Respondent Coram:- HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE S.S.SARON HON'BLE Ms.JUSTICE NAVITA SINGH Present: Mr.Amaninder Preet, Advocate for the applicant- appellant. Mr.Sukhdev Singh, Advocate for the respondent. ***** S.S.Saron, J. C.M.No.3871-CII of 2014 in/and F.A.O.No.M-141 of 2013 (O&M)

Virender ....Applicant- Appellant Vs. Virender ....Applicant- Appellan ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

....Non-applicant - Respondent Coram:- HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE S.S.SARON HON'BLE Ms.JUSTICE NAVITA SINGH Present: Mr.Bharat Bhushan Azad, Advocate for the applicant- appellant. ***** S.S.Saron, J. The marriage between the parties was solemnised as per Hindu rites and ceremonies at

Smt. Joginder Kaur ......... Applicant/Petitioner Vs. Smt. Joginder Ka ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Versus State of Punjab .......Non-applicant/Respondent Coram: Hon'ble MRS.Justice Rekha Mittal -.- Present: Mr.Ram Kumar Chauhan, Advocate for the applicant/petitioner -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. 2. To be referred

R (on the Application of Quila and Another) (Fc) (Respondents) Vs. Sec ...

Court: UK Supreme Court

leave to remain or variation of leave as a spouse or civil partner of another if either the applicant or the sponsor will be aged under 21 ¦ on the date of arrival in the United Kingdom

R (on the Application of Cart) (Appellant) Vs. the Upper Tribunal (Res ...

Court: UK Supreme Court

KB 338. There the tribunal had wrongly interpreted the "service" to be taken into account in assessing the applicant's compensation for loss of office. There was no right of appeal against its decisions. The Attorney General had

R (on the application of Davies and another) (Appellants) Vs. the Comm ...

Court: UK Supreme Court

a promise which is 'clear, unambiguous and devoid of relevant qualification' ¦ It is not essential that the applicant should have relied upon the promise to his detriment, although this is a relevant consideration in deciding whether

Haryana Space Application Centre (harsac) Vs. M/s Pan India Consultant ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.131 OF2021(ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (Civil) No.13503 of 2020) HARYANA SPACE APPLICATION CENTRE (HARSAC) & ANR. … APELLANTS Versus M/S PAN INDIA CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD. … RESPONDENT ORDER INDU MALHOTRA,

Application for Directions and Office Report

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1994)1SCC680

M.N. Venkatachaliah, C.J.,; A.M. Ahmadi,; J.S. Verma,; G.N. Ray and; S.P. Bhar, JJ.1. By these applications the applicants seek certain directions from the Court to the Government of India and the authorised persons to make proper