Appellant V Represented - Judgment Search Results
Bharath Metha Vs. State by Inspector of Police Chennai
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-25-2008
Reported in: AIR2008SC1970; 2008CriLJ2245; 2008(4)SCALE186; (2008)5SCC752; 2008AIRSCW2289; 2008(2)Supreme596
the order of a learned Single Judge of the Madras High Court dismissing the petition filed by the appellant. The Criminal Revision was filed against order dated 22.12.2003 made in CMP No. 7255 of 2003 by the … No. TN-01-F- 9797 which was alleged to have been involved in a case registered for offences punishable under various provisions of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act. The case of the appellant before the High Court was that … that the hirer had entered into hire purchase agreement with Subham Credits represented by the appellant.5. Learned Counsel for the State clearly stated that though
Ramireddygari Virupaksha Reddy and Six ors. Vs. R. Prakash Reddy
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-08-2007
Reported in: 2008(1)ALD658
relying on the evidence of defendants the suit cannot be decreed?2. Sri A.V. Sivaiah, learned Counsel representing the appellants would maintain that this is a suit for specific performance on the strength of an oral agreement of … ground that relying on the evidence of defendants the suit cannot be decreed?2. Sri A.V. Sivaiah, learned Counsel representing the appellants would maintain that this is a suit for specific performance on the strength of an oral
Alstom Power Boilers Ltd. Vs. State Bank of India and anr. and Mrs. Da ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-31-2002
Reported in: 2003(4)BomCR202; [2002]112CompCas674(Bom); (2003)2CompLJ210(Bom); [2003]42SCL197(Bom)
prudent men of business taking a commercial decision beneficial to the class represented by them for whom the scheme is meant. (9) Once the aforesaid … not for the benefit of the minority shareholders of the transferee company. Shri Dwarkadas seriously alleged that the appellant-company was having a brute majority and was, therefore, successful in having the resolution passed in their own private … Alstom Systems Ltd. to consider the scheme by the shareholders/ members and the members of the said company voted for the scheme. 5. Pursuant to the public notices, one Mrs. Darshana Kenia holding five shares in the
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Sarva Shramik Sangh Vs. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-13-2009
Reported in: AIR2009SC2355; [2009(121)FLR908]; JT2009(6)SC53; (2009)IIILLJ237SC; RLW2009(4)SC3296; 2009(6)SCALE73; (2009)11SCC609; 2010(1)SLJ184(SC); 2009(5)LC2237(SC); 2009AIRSCW3173; 2009(3)LHSC1818
R.V. Raveendran, J.1. The appellant union represents the canteen workers of the contractor engaged by Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. (`IOC' for short) for … SCC 233, for short referred to `SAIL-II':The workmen whether before the Labour Court or in writ proceedings, were represented by the same union. A trade union registered under the Trade Unions Act is entitled to espouse the
General Manager (Operations), State Bank of India and ors. Vs. State B ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-20-1998
Reported in: (1998)2CALLT5(SC); [1998(79)FLR94]; JT1998(2)SC580; 1998(2)SCALE401; (1998)3SCC506; [1998]2SCR377; 1998(1)LC575(SC); (1998)2UPLBEC1128
Sujata V. Manohar, J.1. The appellants, representing the State Bank of India have challenged a decision of the Andhra Pradesh High Court setting aside … Sujata V. Manohar, J.1. The appellants, representing the State Bank of India have challenged a decision of the Andhra Pradesh High Court setting aside a
Collector of Central Excise Vs. Tech Invest (India) (P) Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-1988
Reported in: (1988)(17)LC239Tri(Delhi)
1. Smt. V. Zutshi, Departmental Representative for the appellants and Shri D.N. Kohli, Consultant for the respondents heard and papers perused. (1) that the so-called appeal is … 1. Smt. V. Zutshi, Departmental Representative for the appellants and Shri D.N. Kohli, Consultant for the respondents heard and papers perused. (1) that the
Inox Air Products Limited Now Known as Inox Air Products Private Limit ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-30-2025
Reported in: [2025]1S.C.R.1235
while submitting the complaint that Appellant No. 1 firm (Accused No. 5) represented by Appellant No. 2 (Accused No. 6) sold the drug Nitrous Oxide … [B.R. Gavai* and Augustine George Masih, JJ.] Issue for Consideration Whether selling of Nitrous Oxide I.P. by the appellant no. 1 company to the unlicensed accused No.3 firm which does not possess license under Form 20B of … : 2025 INSC 128 INOX Air Products Limited now known as INOX Air Products Private Limited and Another v. The State of Andhra Pradesh (Criminal Appeal no. 486 of 2025) 30 January 2025 [B.R. Gavai* and Augustine
Mahnoor Fatima Imran & Ors. versus M/S Visweswara Infrastructure Pvt L ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-07-2025
Reported in: [2025] 5 S.C.R. 2515
[2025] 5 S.C.R. 2515 : 2025 INSC 646Mahnoor Fatima Imran & Ors. v. M/s Visweswara Infrastructure Pvt Ltd. & Ors. (Civil Appeal No. 6600 of 2025) 07 May 2025 [Sudhanshu Dhulia … Telangana and the petitioners in SLP (C) Diary No.19071 of 2024 are represented by Shri P. Mohith Rao, Advocate on Record, who adopted the arguments … be granted unless actual and physical possession is proved: Held: The Division Bench has found possession on the appellants and the writ petitioners by virtue of two interim orders passed by Co-ordinate Benches of the High Court
G.V. Adhimoolam & Ors. versus the Inspector of Police & Anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-04-2025
Reported in: [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2484
[2025] 4 S.C.R. 2484 : 2025 INSC 681G.V. Adhimoolam & Ors. v. The Inspector of Police & Anr. (Criminal Appeal No. 1797 of 2025) 04 April 2025 [Vikram Nath and … have heard the arguments advanced by Shri S. Nagamuthu, learned senior counsel representing the accused-appellants and Shri V. Krishnamurthy, learned AAG representing the State of … Matter pertains to the sustainability of the order passed by the High Court rejecting the petition of the appellants seeking quashing of complaint against them.Headnotes† Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - s.482 - Quashing of complaint -
Narayana Health & Ors. versus the State of West Bengal & Ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-12-2026
Reported in: [2026] 5 S.C.R. 584
[2026] 5 S.C.R. 584 : 2026 INSC 481Narayana Health & Ors. v. The State of West Bengal & Ors. (Criminal Appeal No(s). 2461-2462 of 2026) 12 May 2026 [Pamidighantam Sri … appellant, being the Chairman of the company; the fourth appellant, being the representative attached with the hospital; and the third respondent, being the former employee … Court setting aside the summoning order passed by the Magistrate and remanding the matter, regarding complicity of first appellant-corporate entity running the co-accused hospital, and the third appellant-Chairman, both of whom are in a separate territorial jurisdiction
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free