Appellant V Delhi - Judgment Search Results

Alok Debroy and anr. Vs. State of Assam

Court: Guwahati

v. The State of Haryana, Respondent.12. AIR 1976 SC 294 (Paras 37, 43 and 51) ; Sat Paul, Appellant v. Delhi Administration, Respondent.13. AIR 1979 SC 1848 (Paras 12 and 13) : Syad Akbar, Appellant v, State of Karnataka,

National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Azad Singh and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (2009)156PLR58

earning at the time of accident. It was also observed in case Smt. Sarla Verma and Ors. appellants v. Delhi Transport Corporation and Anr. respondents (2009) 155 P.L.R. 22 (SiC.) that in case the deceased is 25 years … of 6 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned.F.A.O. No. 3666 of 20092. This appeal, preferred by the appellant-Insurance Company, is directed against the order dated 10.03.2009, passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jhajjar.3. Having examined the

Khem Chand Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1986(1)WLN534

had incised wounds. So a case under Section 324 IPC is made out against Khem Chand.15. Ram Lal Appellant v. Delhi Administration, Respondents in : 1973CriLJ17 their Lordships have observed as under:No attempt was made to identify the internal

Andaman and Nicobar Islands Forest Corpn. Vs. Presiding Officer, Indl. ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1994)1CALLT17(HC),(1994)IILLJ32Cal

Mr. Mehta has referred to the following judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Sadhu Ram, Appellant v. Delhi Transport Corporation, Respondent reported in (1983-II-LLJ-383) wherein the Supreme Court observed as follows (p. 384-385):'The jurisdiction under Article

Ferani Hotels Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The State Information Commissioner and Oth ...

Court: Mumbai

3rd respondent had clearly averred as follows : âBy application dated 10th December 2012 (âthe said application) the appellant had sought information in respect of various plots of land (mentioned therein) of which the applicant in his … information. Moreover, the observations in para 11 of the decision of the Delhi High Court in the case of Harish Kumar vs Pro Vost Marshal … this Court inter alia seeking a declaration that the said development agreement and the power of attorney are validly terminated. It is the Petitioner's case that in the proceedings of this suit, which is pending adjudication, the

Goa Auto Accessories Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Sales Tax and Anothe ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2000(3)BomCR122; (2000)1BOMLR132; 2000(2)MhLj732

judgment in Commissioner Sales Tax v. Kohinoor India Pvt. Ltd. 1980(45) S.T.C. 332, Sujan Singh & another v. Appellate Assistant Commissioner, Sales Tax, Delhi & others 1969(24) S.T.C. 504, Bajaj Tempo Ltd. & others v. The Pimpri

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Sir Purshottamdas Thakurdas

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1946Bom401; (1946)48BOMLR141

a capital one is also the case of Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi v. The Central India Spinning, Weaving and Manufacturing Company, Limited, The Empress … Judicial Committee said (p. 781):It has to be remembered that money is the stock-in-trade of a money-lender. The appellant might well have come to at different conclusion, if he had realised the close connection of this loan … my opinion the matter is really covered by the judgment of the Lord Chancellor, Lord Cave, in Atherton v. British Insulated and Helsby Cables, Ltd. In that case the respondent company claimed as a deduction in computing

Uma Shanker Sharma Vs. The Registrar General Honble High Court Of Judi ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

abates on account of the death of the sole appellant. .....................J.(B.V.NAGARATHNA) New Delhi October 20, 2021 … IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.770 OF2010UMA SHANKER SHARMA Appellant VERSUS THE REGISTRAR GENERAL Respondent HONBLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ORDER Learned counsel for the appellant … IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.770 OF2010UMA SHANKER SHARMA Appellant VERSUS THE REGISTRAR GENERAL Respondent HONBLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ORDER Learned counsel for the appellant Ms.

Pratibha Manchanda Vs. The State Of Haryana

Court: Supreme Court of India

(Crl.) No.8146 2023]. [Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) D.No.20936 of 2022]. Pratibha Manchanda & Anr. … Appellant(s) VERSUS State of Haryana & Anr. … Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Surya Kant, J.1. Application seeking permission to file the … No.8146 2023]. [Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) D.No.20936 of 2022]. Pratibha Manchanda & Anr. … Appellant(s) VERSUS State of Haryana & Anr. … Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Surya Kant, J.1. Application seeking permission to file the SLP … 18.09.1996 (hereinafter, ‘1996 GPA’), registered in the office of Sub­Registrar­V, South East Delhi.5. The Appellants, as alluded to earlier, have adopted the stance that they

Municipal Corporation of Delhi versus Gagan Narang & Ors. Etc.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [2025]1S.C.R.239

them in view of the following observations made by this Court in a recent judgment in Ajit Mohan v. Delhi Legislative Assembly [ Ajit Mohan v. Delhi Legislative Assembly (2022) 3 SCC 529 : 2021 SCC OnLine SC … Consideration Whether the application under Section 63 of the Electricity Act, 2003 could have been made by the Appellant-MCD, a “local authority” within the meaning of Section 2(41) of the Act. Headnotes† Electricity Act, 2003 - ss.63,