Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.
See full guide → Try it now

Appellant V And - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works
Jul 01 2009

Birmingham City Council (Appellants) Vs. Ali (Fc) and Others (Fc) (Res ...

Court: House of Lords

Decided on: Jul-01-2009

becomes available under the Council’s allocation scheme. In the Moran case we would quash the finding that the appellant had become homeless from the refuge intentionally and substitute a finding that she had not. LORD NEUBERGER OF … As Baroness Hale explains, both cases concern the duties of local housing authorities towards homeless people under Part VII of the Housing Act 1996. The question which lies at the heart of the Birmingham case is whether

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Jul 08 1943

Patiala State Bank, Appellant V. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay Pr ...

Court: Privy Council

Decided on: Jul-08-1943

LORD ROMER: The Patiala State Bank (the appellant in this case) is owned and controlled by the Maharajah of Patiala who constitutes the Government of that … sum of money representing the profits accruing to it in respect of the sale at a profit of various investments similarly acquired. It is got and it cannot be disputed that all these sums of money represented

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Oct 24 1946

Canada and Dominion Sugar Co. Ltd., Appellants V. Canadian National (W ...

Court: Privy Council

Decided on: Oct-24-1946

Lord Wright: The appellants claimed in the action as holders of a bill of lading in respect of a quantity of sugar … it was alleged, in addition to the claim on estoppel, that the damage had been sustained during the voyage and that the respondents as shipowners were liable either for failure to carry with due care or for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works
Jan 24 1934

Western Power Co. Canada, Ltd., Appellant V. Corporation of the Distri ...

Court: Privy Council

Decided on: Jan-24-1934

Lord Wright: This appeal is from a portion of a judgment given against the appellant, who was defendant in the Court below, in the Supreme Court of British Columbia and affirmed by the … and was a company making and supplying electric energy for light and power in British Columbia in the vicinity of Vancouver City. In the territory served by it is the respondent Municipality. By the contract in question

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

Try free for 7 days

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales