Appellant S V Raj - Judgment Search Results

Raj Kumar Vs. State of Punjab

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: II(1997)DMC274

V.S. Aggarwal, J.1. Raj Kumar appellant was married to Manjit Kaur deceased. Ram Parkash is the father of Raj Kumar. Both the appellants have

Jagathy Raj V.p. Vs. Rajitha Kumar. S

Court: Supreme Court of India

1072 OF2022(Arising out of SLP(Civil) No(s). 6392 of 2021) DR. JAGATHY RAJ V.P. ….APPELLANT(S) VERSUS DR. RAJITHA KUMAR S. & ORS. ….RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT Rastogi, J.1. … of Cochin University. 13. The relevant facts in brief culled out from the record are that both the appellant and respondent No.1 are members of the teaching faculty and the appellant is senior to respondent No.1 as … NON­REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 1072 OF2022(Arising out of SLP(Civil) No(s). 6392 of 2021)

Sachin Kumar Singhraha Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh

Court: Supreme Court of India

of a 2­year­old girl, this Court modified the sentence of death to imprisonment for the rest of the appellant’s life. In Raj Kumar v. State of Madhya Pradesh, (2014) 5 SCC353 a case concerning the rape and

Chaube Jagdish Prasad and anr. Vs. Ganga Prasad Chaturvedi

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1959SC492; [1959]Supp1SCR733

of the Code of Civil Procedure. The landlord who was the plaintiff in the trial court is the appellant before us and the tenant who was the defendant is the respondent. 2. The facts of this appeal … these judgments of the Privy Council as also the previous judgments in Rajah Amir Hassan Khan v. Sheo Baksh Singh (1884) L.R. 11 I.A. 237 … Kapur, J.1. This is an appeal by special leave against the decision of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad passed in revision under section 115 … issues raised were :- (1) 'Whether the suit is not maintainable in view of any provisions of the Act No. 3 of 1947 (2) Whether

The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax Cit(a) vs M/S Tavant Technologies I ...

Court: Karnataka

CIRCLE-2(1)(1) 2ND FLOOR BMTC BUILDING 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA Digitally signed by …APPELLANTS BHARATHI S (BY SRI. RAVI RAJ Y V.,ADVOCATE A/W Location: HIGH COURT SRI. DILIP M. ADVOCATE) OF KARNATAKA AND: M/S TAVANT TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PVT … MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT) Heard the learned counsel Sri Raviraj Y.V, along with learned counsel Sri Dilip M, for appellants/Revenue and learned counsel Miss.Manasa Ananthan, for the respondent/assessee.2. The Revenue is in appeal under Section 260-A ofthe Income

G.V.Adhimoolam Vs S.Asaithambi

Court: Chennai

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ O.S.A.Nos. 331 and 332 of 2025 O.S.A.No.331 of 2025: 1.G.V.Adhimoolam 2.A.Vijay Raj ...Appellants Vs. 1.S.Asaithambi 2.Kavitha 3.Makala 4.Senthilkumar 5.Lokeshwaran 6.Lalithambikai 7.Shanmugam 8.Selvi 9.K.Makewari 10.K.Mohan Kumar 11.Yasotha 12.Rajamani ...Respondents PRAYER in O.S.A.No.331 of … aside the fair and decreetal order dated 25.10.2024 made in O.A.No.442 of 2024 by allowing this appeal. For Appellants : Mr.K.Suresh Babu For Mr.K.Vanisree For Respondents : Ms.K.Niranjana Devi for R1 to R3 Mr.S.P.S.Nithyan for R4 to

B.Paul Britto Vs The Addl. Chief Security Commissioner,

Court: Chennai

same would amount to re-evaluation of factsas an appellate authority (See - Raj Kumar Dixit V. M/s.Vijay Kumar Gauri Shanker - (2015) 9 SCC 345)26. … him with penalty of withholding of three increments.7. It is also contended that the order passed by the appellate authorityon 14.02.2012 dismissing the appeal of the petitioner and further revision vide order dated 11.12.2014 are all passed … : 04.11.2025PRONOUNCED ON : 14.11.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR B.Paul Britto ... Petitioner vs1. The Additional Chief Security CommissionerRailway Protection Force, Southern Railway Chennai - 600 003. 2.Senior Divisional Security Commissioner / RPF / MAS Railway … ON : 14.11.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR B.Paul Britto ... Petitioner vs1. The Additional Chief Security CommissionerRailway Protection Force, Southern Railway Chennai - 600

The Commissioner of Income Tax (a) vs M/S Urban Ladder Home Decor Solu ...

Court: Karnataka

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-2(2) 80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA Digitallysigned by …APPELLANTS BHARATHI S (BY SRI. RAVI RAJ Y V.,ADVOCATE A/W Location: SRI. DILIP M, ADVOCATE)HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AND: M/S. URBAN LADDER HOME DECOR SOLUTIONS … MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT) Heard the learned counsel Sri Raviraj Y.V, along with learned counsel Sri Dilip M, for appellants/Revenue and learned counsel Sri Sandeep Huilgol, for the respondent/assessee.2. The Revenue is in appeal under Section 260-A ofthe

The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax vs M/S Sigma Aldrich Chemicals Pvt ...

Court: Karnataka

ADDRESS, ACIT-CIRCLE -6 (1)(1) 2ND FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING, KORAMANGALA, Digitally signed …APPELLANTS by BHARATHI S (BY SRI. RAVI RAJ Y V.,ADVOCATE A/W Location: HIGH SRI. DILIP M, ADVOCATE) COURT OF KARNATAKA AND: M/S SIGMA ALDRICH CHEMICALS PVT … MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT) Heard the learned counsel Sri Raviraj Y.V, along with learned counsel Sri Dilip M, for appellants/Revenue and learned counsel Sri Ashok A.Kulkarni, for the respondent/assessee.2. The Revenue is in appeal under Section 260-A ofthe

The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax vs M/S Sree Shivalingeshwara Arecan ...

Court: Karnataka

570 008. Digitally signed by …APPELLANTS BHARATHI S Location: (BY SRI. RAVI RAJ Y.V., ADVOCATE) HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AND: M/S. SREE SHIVALINGESHWARA ARECANUT TRADERS … 560 0012. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE NO.55/1, SHILPASHREE VIDHYARANYA COMPLEX VISHVESHWARANAGAR MYSURU - 570 008. Digitally signed by …APPELLANTS BHARATHI S … Year 2014-15 (Annexure-C).2. The appeal was admitted on 06.09.2022 to examine the questions of law raised by the appellants which are extracted below:1. "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of thecase, the Tribunal order can … -1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.266