Skip to content


Appearance - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: appearance Year: 1995 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.112 seconds)
Jan 03 1995 (TRI)

Usha Amorphous Metals Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jan-03-1995

Reported in: (1995)(76)ELT631TriDel

..... of rs 50 000 fifty thousands on the appellant 3 shri r santhanam learned advocate appearing for the appellant submitted that there were three charges against the appellant viz i unauthorised .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 28 1995 (TRI)

M.M. Rubber Company Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Nov-28-1995

Reported in: (1996)(83)ELT173TriDel

..... was paid erroneously and hence the refund claim 2a when the case was called none appeared on behalf of the appellants however they have requested for a decision on merits in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 29 1995 (TRI)

Kutch Cement (P) Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Nov-29-1995

Reported in: (1996)(82)ELT280TriDel

1 shri l c agarwal learned counsel appearing for the appellants submitted that the appellants applied for an ssi certificate on 26 2 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 28 1995 (TRI)

Collector of C Ex. Vs. Mysore Lamp Works Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Nov-28-1995

Reported in: (1999)(108)ELT810TriDel

..... s bajaj electricals have sold their goods to their customers shri r k jain consultant appearing for the respondents submitted that the respondents have taken a specific plea before the asstt .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 29 1995 (TRI)

Shree Electronics Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Nov-29-1995

Reported in: (1996)(81)ELT407TriDel

..... for recording statement under section 108 of the act one of the partners satish luthra appeared on 28 7 1992 and his statement was recorded the concern is a registered firm .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 29 1995 (TRI)

R.B. NaraIn Singh Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Nov-29-1995

Reported in: (1996)(82)ELT588TriDel

..... molasses is an important input for alcohol and the control by the state excise department appeared to be strict the appellants sought permission from the state excise department for draining out .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 29 1995 (TRI)

Hindustan Lever Ltd. Vs. C.C.E.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Nov-29-1995

Reported in: (1997)(89)ELT720TriDel

..... of various deductions allowed by the collector appeals 2 learned counsel shri c s lodha appeared for the appellants m s hindustan lever ltd he submitted that out of the items .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 27 1995 (TRI)

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Kesavardhini Products

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Nov-27-1995

Reported in: (1996)(81)ELT527TriDel

..... ii b prior to 1986 he also reiterated the findings in the impugned order 4 appearing on behalf of the respondents m s kesvardhini products madras in appeal no e 1538 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 28 1995 (TRI)

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Indo-japan Steels Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Nov-28-1995

Reported in: (1996)(85)ELT126TriDel

..... 173q it should be more than that 2 when the cases were called no one appeared on behalf of the assessee but there is a request from them for adjournment in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 01 1995 (TRI)

Orson Electronics Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Dec-01-1995

Reported in: (1996)(82)ELT499TriDel

..... perusal of these documents i state that the discrepancies are obvious and both the invoices appear genuine i identify and confirm that the signature on invoice no d 86 2482 2485 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //