Full Judgment
2. When the cases were called, no one appeared on behalf of the assessee but there is a request from them for adjournment in the appeal filed by the department. Since the matter is an old one and these are two connected matters, we have proceeded to pass this order after hearing ld. DR for the Revenue.
3. The Collector after taking into consideration the facts and circumstances confirmed the duty and denied the benefit in terms of Notification 66/72-C.E., dated 1-3-1973 on the ground that such scraps as fresh unused steel melting scraps which generally arise in an integrated ore-based steel plants and since the factory of the assessee is not an integrated ore-based steel plant, benefit under Notification No. 66/73 cannot be extended to the party. In the circumstances he confirmed the duty amount and imposed penalty of Rs. 10,000/-. On going through the facts and circumstances of the case and in view of the observations made by the Collector while imposing penalty of Rs. 10,000/-, we find that penalty was just and reasonable and we are not inclined to interfere with the order passed by the adjudicating authority since we have considered all the aspects. In the view we have taken, both the appeals filed by the respective parties are hereby dismissed.